Safety of a Novel ESAT6-CFP10 skin test compared with tuberculin skin test in a double-blind, randomized, controlled study

被引:5
|
作者
Yang, Yang [1 ]
Fang, Zhixiong [2 ]
Huang, Wei [1 ]
Zhang, Haiming [2 ]
Luo, Si [3 ]
Lin, Sha [2 ]
Li, Shaojie [4 ]
Lu, Shuihua [5 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Publ Hlth Clin Ctr, Shanghai 201508, Peoples R China
[2] Cent Hosp Xiangtan, Dept Infect Dis & Publ Hlth, Xiangtan, Hunan, Peoples R China
[3] Xiangtan Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Xiangtan, Hunan, Peoples R China
[4] Xiangtan First Peoples Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Xiangtan, Hunan, Peoples R China
[5] Southern Univ Sci & Technol, Natl Clin Res Ctr Infect Dis, Shenzhen Peoples Hosp 3, Dept Pulm Med,Affiliated Hosp 2,Sch Med, Shenzhen 518112, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Tuberculosis; ESAT6-CFP10; Safety; Tuberculin skin test; RELEASE ASSAYS; DIAGNOSIS; INFECTION;
D O I
10.1186/s12879-022-07765-w
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background ESAT6-CFP10 (EC) skin test has been reported accurate and safe in identifying tuberculosis infection. We aimed to demonstrate the safety of EC skin test compared with tuberculin skin test (TST) in university freshmen. Methods: We conducted a double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical study in a university freshmen population with 16,680 participates in China, and finally 14,579 completed the study. About a half received an EC skin test and the others received TST. Adverse reactions were evaluated. Results Out of the 14,579 participants, 48.2% (7029/14,579) were males. The average age was 18.1 +/- 0.8 years and the average BMI was 20.9 +/- 3.1 kg/m(2). 50.4% (7351/14,579) participants received EC skin test and 49.6% (7228/14,579) received TST. The EC group had significantly less adverse reactions compared with the TST group (21.3%, 1565/7351 vs. 34.6%, 2499/7228, P = 0.000). The most common adverse reactions for EC were bleeding (5.63%, 414), dermatodyschroia (4.27%, 314), induration (3.90%, 287), swelling (2.49%, 183), pain (1.59%, 117) and pruritus (1.48%, 109). Bleeding, dermatodyschroia, swelling and erythema were significantly less in EC group (P < 0.05), while others were similar to those of TST. Conclusion the EC skin test was safe in our cohort. And its incidence of total adverse drug reactions (ADRs) is less than that of TST. Most adverse reactions were mild or moderate, lasting less than 48 h and self-limiting. Considering the satisfactory diagnostic accuracy in identifying tuberculosis infection, the cost and safety, the EC skin test might be a potential candidate for replacing TST in high burden countries or those with routine BCG vaccination. Clinical Trials Registration. ChiCTR2000038622, Safety of the EC skin test to screen tuberculosis infection in two universities, compared with the tuberculin skin test: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. registered on 26/09/2020 at .
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ESAT-6/CFP10 Skin Test Predicts Disease in M-tuberculosis-Infected Guinea Pigs
    Weldingh, Karin
    Andersen, Peter
    PLOS ONE, 2008, 3 (04):
  • [22] Diagnosis of tuberculosis infection in children with a novel skin test and the traditional tuberculin skin test: An observational study
    Fritschi, Nora
    Gureva, Tatyana
    Eliseev, Platon
    Jackson, Charlotte
    Milanzi, Edith
    Crichton, Siobhan
    Collins, Intira Jeannie
    Turkova, Anna
    Mariandyshev, Andrei
    Ritz, Nicole
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (08):
  • [23] Safety and Efficacy Assessment of Two New Leprosy Skin Test Antigens: Randomized Double Blind Clinical Study
    Rivoire, Becky L.
    Groathouse, Nathan A.
    TerLouw, Stephen
    Neupane, Kapil Dev
    Ranjit, Chaman
    Sapkota, Bishwa Raj
    Khadge, Saraswoti
    Kunwar, Chatra B.
    Macdonald, Murdo
    Hawksworth, Rachel
    Thapa, Min B.
    Hagge, Deanna A.
    Tibbals, Melinda
    Smith, Carol
    Dube, Tina
    She, Dewei
    Wolff, Mark
    Zhou, Eric
    Makhene, Mamodikoe
    Mason, Robin
    Sizemore, Christine
    Brennan, Patrick J.
    PLOS NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASES, 2014, 8 (05):
  • [24] Comparison of a new ESAT-6/CFP-10 peptide-based gamma interferon assay and a tuberculin skin test for tuberculosis screening in a moderate-risk population
    Porsa, E
    Cheng, L
    Seale, MM
    Delclos, GL
    Ma, X
    Reich, R
    Musser, JM
    Graviss, EA
    CLINICAL AND VACCINE IMMUNOLOGY, 2006, 13 (01) : 53 - 58
  • [25] Vitamin D, tuberculin skin test conversion, and latent tuberculosis in Mongolian school-age children: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled feasibility trial
    Ganmaa, Davaasambuu
    Giovannucci, Edward
    Bloom, Barry R.
    Fawzi, Wafaie
    Burr, Winthrop
    Batbaatar, Dulguun
    Sumberzul, Nyamjav
    Holick, Michael F.
    Willett, Walter C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2012, 96 (02): : 391 - 396
  • [26] Efficacy and safety of delafloxacin compared with vancomycin plus aztreonam for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: a Phase 3, double-blind, randomized study
    Pullman, J.
    Gardovskis, J.
    Farley, B.
    Sun, E.
    Quintas, M.
    Lawrence, L.
    Ling, R.
    Cammarata, S.
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2017, 72 (12) : 3471 - 3480
  • [27] Screening for Tuberculosis in Children and Adolescents in Moscow Using Skin Tests with Tuberculin and Recombinant Allergen (Cfp-10-Esat-6) in 2020
    Slogotskaya, L.
    Bogorodskaya, E.
    Kudlay, D.
    Nikolenko, N.
    Shamuratova, L.
    Sevostyanova, T.
    PEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY, 2021, 56 : S143 - S143
  • [28] Comparison of an ESAT-6/CFP-10 peptide-based enzyme-linked immunospot assay to a tuberculin skin test for screening of a population at moderate risk of contracting tuberculosis
    Porsa, Esmaeil
    Cheng, Lee
    Graviss, Edward A.
    CLINICAL AND VACCINE IMMUNOLOGY, 2007, 14 (06) : 714 - 719
  • [29] Oral administration of hyaluronic acid to improve skin conditions via a randomized double-blind clinical test
    Gao, Yan-Rui
    Wang, Rui-Ping
    Zhang, Lu
    Fan, Yuan
    Luan, Jin
    Liu, Zhe
    Yuan, Chao
    SKIN RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 29 (11)
  • [30] Prevention of pruritus with ethyl-chloride in skin prick test: a double-blind placebo-controlled prospective study
    Gal-Oz, Amir
    Kivity, Shmuel
    Shacham, Yacov
    Fiszer, Elisheva
    Rogowsky, Ori
    Chernin, Gil
    ALLERGY ASTHMA AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2015, 11