The Effects of Tunnel Technology on Crop Productivity and Livelihood of Smallholder Farmers in Nepal

被引:4
|
作者
Diwakar, K. C. [1 ]
Jamarkattel, Dinesh [2 ]
Maraseni, Tek [3 ]
Nandwani, Dilip [4 ]
Karki, Pratibha [5 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Dept Mkt, 226 Grey St, Brisbane, Qld 4101, Australia
[2] Prov Govt, Agr Knowledge Ctr, Lalitpur 44700, Bagmati Provinc, Nepal
[3] Univ Southern Queensland, Ctr Sustainable Agr Syst, West St, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia
[4] Tennessee State Univ, Dept Agr & Environm Sci, John A Merritt Blvd, Nashville, TN 37209 USA
[5] Tribhuvan Univ, Inst Agr & Anim Sci IAAS, Dept Agr Extens, Kathmandu 44600, Nepal
关键词
livelihood; smallholder farmers; tunnel technology; sustainable development; agricultural growth; ADOPTION; HOUSEHOLD; IMPACT; INCOME; AGRICULTURE; MANAGEMENT; VARIETIES; YIELD;
D O I
10.3390/su13147935
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Technologies-based production practices are critical for agricultural growth and sustainable development in low-income countries like Nepal. In the last few years, tunnel house has been increasingly promoted as tools to enhance smallholder farmers' livelihood and tackle climate adversaries. However, little is known about what factor determines its adoption and whether it helps smallholders adapt to climate change and experience better livelihood. We address these gaps using the cross-sectional survey data collected from 62 adopters and 92 non-adopters in three municipalities of Bagmati Province. We employed descriptive analysis and probit model and found out that age, farm size, and ethnicity strongly influence the technology adoption amongst smallholder farmers. Additionally, treatment model and ordinary least square (OLS) regression were utilized to examine tunnel technology's effect. Our study shows that tunnel significantly increases production by 32 tons/year/hectare and protects crops from climate change effects such as heavy rainfall and temperature change. Likewise, tunnel technology increases the net crop income by $1700/year/hectare. However, the economic benefit is not substantial compared to technology's adoption cost as adopters incur enormous costs of $12,000/year/hectare on equipment, labor and resources. These results suggest policymakers should concentrate on reducing the technology's cost, which could be achieved through subsidies, financial support, or price control mechanisms. Ensuring technology's affordability can contribute to smallholder farmers' sustainable livelihood in Nepal and countries with similar contexts.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Impact of cooperative membership on production efficiency of smallholder goat farmers in Nepal
    Neupane, Huma
    Paudel, Krishna P.
    Adhikari, Mandeep
    He, Qinying
    [J]. ANNALS OF PUBLIC AND COOPERATIVE ECONOMICS, 2022, 93 (02) : 337 - 356
  • [32] Awareness and Practices Relating to Zoonotic Diseases Among Smallholder Farmers in Nepal
    Terra R. Kelly
    David A. Bunn
    Nanda P. Joshi
    Daniel Grooms
    Durga Devkota
    Naba R. Devkota
    Lok Nath Paudel
    Annette Roug
    David J. Wolking
    Jonna A. K. Mazet
    [J]. EcoHealth, 2018, 15 : 656 - 669
  • [33] Adoption of soil and water conservation technology and its effect on the productivity of smallholder rice farmers in Southwest Nigeria
    Ojo, Temitope O.
    Baiyegunhi, Lloyd J. S.
    Adetoro, Adetoso A.
    Ogundeji, Abiodun A.
    [J]. HELIYON, 2021, 7 (03)
  • [34] Climate Change Adaptation by Smallholder Tea Farmers: a Case Study of Nepal
    Muench, Steffen
    Bavorova, Miroslava
    Pradhan, Prajal
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2021, 116 : 136 - 146
  • [35] Factors affecting crop diversity in farmers' fields in Nepal
    Pandey, Sushil
    [J]. RENEWABLE AGRICULTURE AND FOOD SYSTEMS, 2015, 30 (02) : 202 - 209
  • [36] Intercropping of maize, millet, mustard, wheat and ginger increased land productivity and potential economic returns for smallholder terrace farmers in Nepal
    Chapagain, Tejendra
    Pudasaini, Roshan
    Ghimire, Bhawana
    Gurung, Khem
    Choi, Khem
    Rai, Laxmi
    Magar, Samjhana
    Bishnu, B. K.
    Raizada, Manish N.
    [J]. FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2018, 227 : 91 - 101
  • [37] Productivity and efficiency heterogeneity among maize smallholder farmers in Ethiopia
    Alemu, Mengistu
    Berihun, Daregot
    Lokossou, Jourdain C.
    Yismaw, Bedilu
    [J]. COGENT FOOD & AGRICULTURE, 2024, 10 (01):
  • [38] INCREASING PRODUCTIVITY OF SMALLHOLDER FARMERS THROUGH IMPROVED TOOLS AND EDUCATION
    Lemke, Shawna
    Purcell, John
    Edge, Mark
    Young, Mark
    [J]. ANNALS OF NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2017, 71 : 1315 - 1316
  • [39] Nitrogen use efficiency trends for sustainable crop productivity in Lake Victoria basin: smallholder farmers' perspectives on nitrogen cycling
    Ntinyari, Winnie'
    Gweyi-Onyango, Joseph
    Giweta, Mekonnen
    Mochoge, Benson
    Mutegi, James
    Nziguheba, Generose
    Masso, Cargele
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 4 (01):
  • [40] Does livelihood capital influence the livelihood diversification strategies of smallholder rice farmers? Evidence from the Mekong Delta of Vietnam
    Ho, Tien D. N.
    Tsusaka, Takuji W.
    Kuwornu, John K. M.
    Lam, Lan M. T.
    Vu, Thuong T.
    [J]. COGENT ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2024, 12 (01):