A novel fuzzy risk matrix based risk assessment approach

被引:29
|
作者
Can, Gulin Feryal [1 ]
Toktas, Pelin [1 ]
机构
[1] Baskent Univ, Engn Fac, Ind Engn Dept, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Fuzzy logic; Risk assessment; F-DEMATEL; F-MABAC; HYBRID MCDM APPROACH; OCCUPATIONAL-HEALTH; HUMAN-RESOURCE; DEMATEL; MODEL; MABAC; SELECTION; AHP; LOCATION; ANP;
D O I
10.1108/K-12-2017-0497
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Purpose - Traditional risk assessment (RA) methodologies cannot model vagueness in risk and cannot prioritize corrective-preventive measures (CPMs) by considering effectiveness of those on risk types (RTs). These cannot combine and reflect accurately different subjective opinions and cannot be used in a linguistic manner. Risk factors (RFs) are assumed to have the same importance and interrelations between RFs are not considered. This study aims to overcome these disadvantages by combining fuzzy logic with multi-criteria decision-making in a dynamic manner. Design/methodology/approach - This study proposes a novel three-stage fuzzy risk matrix-based RA integrating fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (F-DEMATEL) and fuzzy multi-attributive border approximation area comparison (F-MABAC). At the first stage, importance weights of RFs are computed by F-DEMATEL. At the second stage, risk degrees of RTs are computed via using fuzzy risk matrix. At the third stage, CPMs are ranked by F-MABAC. Finally, a numerical example for RA in a warehouse is given. Findings - Results show that developing instructions for material loading or unloading is the most important CPM and severity is the most important RF for the warehouse. Originality/value - This study has originality in terms of having fuzzy dynamic structure. At first, RFs are assumed to be criteria sets then, RTs are assumed to be criteria set considering their risk degrees to rank CPMs in a fuzzy manner. Risk degrees of RTs are used for weights of RTs and effectiveness of CPMs are used for performance values of CPMs.
引用
收藏
页码:1721 / 1751
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A novel fuzzy approach to gas pipeline risk assessment under influence of ground movement
    Malinowska, Agnieszka
    Cui, Ximin
    Salmi, Ebrahim Fathi
    Hejmanowski, Ryszard
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 9 (01)
  • [32] Optimizing Multimodal Transportation: A Novel Decision-Making Approach With Fuzzy Risk Assessment
    Muthunandhini, R.
    Palanivel, K.
    IEEE ACCESS, 2025, 13 : 14584 - 14610
  • [33] Multi-factorial risk assessment: An approach based on fuzzy preference relations
    Perez-Fernandez, Raul
    Alonso, Pedro
    Diaz, Irene
    Montes, Susana
    FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2015, 278 : 67 - 80
  • [34] Fermatean fuzzy TOPSIS-based approach for occupational risk assessment in manufacturing
    Muhammet Gul
    Huai-Wei Lo
    Melih Yucesan
    Complex & Intelligent Systems, 2021, 7 : 2635 - 2653
  • [35] FOOD SECURITY RISK LEVEL ASSESSMENT: A FUZZY LOGIC-BASED APPROACH
    Kadir, Muhd Khairulzaman Abdul
    Hines, Evor L.
    Qaddoum, Kefaya
    Collier, Rosemary
    Dowler, Elizabeth
    Grant, Wyn
    Leeson, Mark
    Iliescu, Daciana
    Subramanian, Arjunan
    Richards, Keith
    Merali, Yasmin
    Napier, Richard
    APPLIED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2013, 27 (01) : 50 - 61
  • [36] A fuzzy information-based approach for breast cancer risk factors assessment
    Buyukavcu, Aysegul
    Albayrak, Y. Esra
    Goker, Nazli
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2016, 38 : 437 - 452
  • [37] Fermatean fuzzy TOPSIS-based approach for occupational risk assessment in manufacturing
    Gul, Muhammet
    Lo, Huai-Wei
    Yucesan, Melih
    COMPLEX & INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2021, 7 (05) : 2635 - 2653
  • [38] Risk assessment system of natural hazards:: A new approach based on fuzzy probability
    Karimi, Iman
    Huellermeier, Eyke
    FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2007, 158 (09) : 987 - 999
  • [39] A novel fuzzy mechanism for risk assessment in software projects
    Suresh, K.
    Dillibabu, R.
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2020, 24 (03) : 1683 - 1705
  • [40] A novel fuzzy mechanism for risk assessment in software projects
    K. Suresh
    R. Dillibabu
    Soft Computing, 2020, 24 : 1683 - 1705