Regenerative Endodontic Procedure of Immature Permanent Teeth with Leukocyte and Platelet-rich Fibrin: A Multicenter Controlled Clinical Trial

Introduction: The aim of this nonrandomized, multicenter controlled clinical trial was to evaluate the impact of leukocyte-platelet-rich fibrin (LPRF) on regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs) of immature permanent teeth in terms of periapical bone healing (PBH) and further root development (RD). Methods: Healthy patients between 6-25 years with an inflamed or necrotic immature permanent tooth were included and divided between the test (= REP + LPRF) and control (= REP-LPRF) group depending on their compliance and the clinical setting (university hospital or private practice). After receiving REP +/- LPRF, the patients were recalled after 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. At each recall session, the teeth were clinically and radiographically (by means of a periapical radiograph [PR]) evaluated. A cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) imaging was taken preoperatively and 2 and 3 years postoperatively. PBH and RD were quantitatively and qualitatively assessed. Results: Twentynine teeth with a necrotic pulp were included, from which 23 (9 test and 14 control) were analyzed. Three teeth in the test group had a flare-up reaction in the first year after REP. Except for 2 no shows, all the analyzed teeth survived up to 3 years after REP, and, in case of failure, apexification preserved them. Complete PBH was obtained in 91.3% and 87% of the cases based on PR qualitative and quantitative evaluation, respectively, with no significant difference between the groups with respect to the baseline. The PR quantitative change in RD at the last recall session with respect to the baseline was not significant (all P values > .05) in both groups. The qualitative assessment of the type of REP root healing was nonuniform. In the test group, 55.6% of the teeth presented no RD and no apical closure. Only 50% of the 14 teeth assessed with CBCT imaging presented complete PBH. Regarding volumetric measurements on RD 3 years after REP for the change with respect to the baseline in root hard tissue volume, mean root hard tissue thickness, and apical area, the control group performed significantly in favor of RD than the test group (P = .03, .003, and 0.05 respectively). For the volumetric change 3 years after REP with respect to the baseline in root length and maximum root hard tissue thickness, no significant difference (P = .72 and .4, respectively) was found between the groups. The correlation between the PR and CBCT variables assessing RD was weak (root lengthening) to very weak (root thickening). Conclusions: REP-LP RF seems to be a viable treatment option to obtain PBH and aid further RD of necrotic immature permanent teeth. Caution is needed when evaluating REP with PR.