Squeeze me, but don't tease me: Human and mechanical touch enhance visual attention and emotion discrimination

被引:45
|
作者
Schirmer, Annett [1 ]
Teh, Keng Soon [1 ]
Wang, Shuo [1 ]
Vijayakumar, Ranjith [1 ]
Ching, April [1 ]
Nithianantham, Darshini [1 ]
Escoffier, Nicolas [1 ]
Cheok, Adrian David [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Fac Arts & Social Sci, Dept Psychol, Singapore 117570, Singapore
关键词
Somatosensory; Empathy; Social facilitation; Brain; Communication; SEX-DIFFERENCES; SOCIAL SUPPORT; TIME-COURSE; PERCEPTION; BRAIN;
D O I
10.1080/17470919.2010.507958
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Being touched by another person influences our readiness to empathize with and support that person. We asked whether this influence arises from somatosensory experience, the proximity to the person and/or an attribution of the somatosensory experience to the person. Moreover, we were interested in whether and how touch affects the processing of ensuing events. To this end, we presented neutral and negative pictures with or without gentle pressure to the participants' forearm. In Experiment 1, pressure was applied by a friend, applied by a tactile device and attributed to the friend, or applied by a tactile device and attributed to a computer. Across these conditions, touch enhanced event-related potential (ERP) correlates of picture processing. Pictures elicited a larger posterior N100 and a late positivity discriminated more strongly between pictures of neutral and negative content when participants were touched. Experiment 2 replicated these findings while controlling for the predictive quality of touch. Experiment 3 replaced tactile contact with a tone, which failed to enhance N100 amplitude and emotion discrimination reflected by the late positivity. This indicates that touch sensitizes ongoing cognitive and emotional processes and that this sensitization is mediated by bottom-up somatosensory processing. Moreover, touch seems to be a special sensory signal that influences recipients in the absence of conscious reflection and that promotes prosocial behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 230
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Don't touch me on my psychology and religion! Feminist backlash in a wearable cloak and different voice
    Potgieter, Cheryl
    Nadar, Sarojini
    AGENDA-EMPOWERING WOMEN FOR GENDER EQUITY, 2010, 24 (83): : 46 - 54
  • [32] 'Treat me as a human being-don't look at me as a woman': femininities and professional identities in further education
    Leathwood, C
    GENDER AND EDUCATION, 2005, 17 (04) : 387 - 409
  • [33] Don't squeeze me! Exploring the mechanisms and boundary conditions between social crowding and uncivilised tourist behaviour
    Li, Lan
    Liu, Xin
    Zheng, Limin
    Cai, Yuqi
    CURRENT ISSUES IN TOURISM, 2024,
  • [34] Don't touch me, I'm fine: Robot autonomy using an artificial innate immune system
    Neal, Mark
    Feyereisl, Jan
    Rascuna, Rosario
    Wang, Xiaolei
    ARTIFICIAL IMMUNE SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 4163 : 349 - 361
  • [35] Skill acquisition with human and computer teammates: Don't sit so close to me
    LoVerde, Jamie L.
    Scerbo, Mark W.
    Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1998, 2
  • [36] CD47 is a Critical 'Don't Eat Me Signal' for Human CAR T Cells
    Beckett, Alex
    Chockley, Peter
    Gottschalk, Stephen
    DeRenzo, Chris
    MOLECULAR THERAPY, 2022, 30 (04) : 516 - 516
  • [38] Don’t Stare at Me: The Impact of a Humanoid Robot’s Gaze upon Trust During a Cooperative Human–Robot Visual Task
    Christopher John Stanton
    Catherine J. Stevens
    International Journal of Social Robotics, 2017, 9 : 745 - 753
  • [39] Now you see me, now you don't: evidence that chimpanzees understand the role of the eyes in attention
    Hostetter, Autumn B.
    Russell, Jamie L.
    Freeman, Hani
    Hopkins, William D.
    ANIMAL COGNITION, 2007, 10 (01) : 55 - 62
  • [40] Now you see me, now you don't: evidence that chimpanzees understand the role of the eyes in attention
    Autumn B. Hostetter
    Jamie L. Russell
    Hani Freeman
    William D. Hopkins
    Animal Cognition, 2007, 10