Application of a Multi-Person and Multi-Objective Decision-Making Model in Groundwater Resources Management

被引:2
|
作者
Wang, Guo Li [1 ]
Huang, Li Li [1 ]
Liang, Guo Hua [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Univ Technol, Sch Hydraul Engn, Dalian 116024, Peoples R China
关键词
Decision-making; Groundwater resources management; Two-stage satisfying programming; Close-degree; WATER-RESOURCES; RATIO METHOD; CONFLICT;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000468
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The management of groundwater resources is complex, especially when decisions about the ecological environment and the social environment are considered. In addition to this, economic efficiency should be considered. The solution to these complex decision problems requires the use of mathematical techniques that are formulated to take into account conflicting objectives. With the development and application of coordinate game theory, many models based on the Nash solution exist for groundwater management systems, but there is still a gap in applying them to practical problems. In this paper, a model based on the marginal solution and the satisfaction function is adopted. In order to solve these multiperson and multi-objective decision-making problems, the arbitrating solution, which is the ideal state accepted by those parties, is first deduced by two-stage satisfying programming; and the final satisfying decision is then chosen by the close-degree principle, which is proposed using fuzzy pattern recognition. Additionally, this article uses groundwater system management in the Jinan Spring area as an example to show how the model can be applied. It is shown that this model is easy to solve and feasible to apply. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000468. (C) 2012 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页码:389 / 393
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Multi-objective decision-making for road design
    Brauers, Willem Karel M.
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Peldschus, Friedel
    Turskis, Zenonas
    [J]. TRANSPORT, 2008, 23 (03) : 183 - 193
  • [12] A Survey of Multi-Objective Sequential Decision-Making
    Roijers, Diederik M.
    Vamplew, Peter
    Whiteson, Shimon
    Dazeley, Richard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH, 2013, 48 : 67 - 113
  • [13] Multi-objective decision-making method of IS outsourcing
    Wang Zuzhu
    Zhou Xiaoxi
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2007 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING - MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION STUDIES SECTION, 2007, : 1170 - 1175
  • [14] Multi-Person Multiobjective Fuzzy Decision-Making Model for Reservoir Flood Control Operation
    Yi-bin Yu
    Ben-de Wang
    Guo-li Wang
    Wei Li
    [J]. Water Resources Management, 2004, 18 : 111 - 124
  • [15] A multi-objective decision-making method for machining process plan and an application
    Lv, Lishu
    Deng, Zhaohui
    Meng, Huijuan
    Liu, Tao
    Wan, Linlin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 260
  • [16] Multi-person multiobjective fuzzy decision-making model for reservoir flood control operation
    Yu, YB
    Wang, BD
    Wang, GL
    Li, W
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2004, 18 (02) : 111 - 124
  • [17] Multi-Objective Parameter Calibration and Multi-Attribute Decision-Making: An Application to Conceptual Hydrological Model Calibration
    Jianzhong Zhou
    Shuo Ouyang
    Xuemin Wang
    Lei Ye
    Hao Wang
    [J]. Water Resources Management, 2014, 28 : 767 - 783
  • [18] Multi-Objective Parameter Calibration and Multi-Attribute Decision-Making: An Application to Conceptual Hydrological Model Calibration
    Zhou, Jianzhong
    Ouyang, Shuo
    Wang, Xuemin
    Ye, Lei
    Wang, Hao
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2014, 28 (03) : 767 - 783
  • [19] Multi-objective decision-making model based on CBM for an aircraft fleet
    Luo, Bin
    Lin, Lin
    [J]. ADVANCES IN MATERIALS, MACHINERY, ELECTRONICS II, 2018, 1955
  • [20] Research on a Multi-objective Fuzzy Optimization Model of Group Decision-making
    Zhu, Jiajun
    Qin, Chaoyon
    Zheng, Jianguo
    [J]. ADVANCES IN BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE AND FINANCIAL ENGINEERING, 2008, 5 : 748 - 753