Costoclavicular Venous Decompression in Patients With Threatened Arteriovenous Hemodialysis Access

被引:26
|
作者
Glass, Carolyn [1 ]
Dugan, Michelle [1 ]
Gillespie, David [1 ]
Doyle, Adam [1 ]
Illig, Karl [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Div Vasc Surg, Med Ctr, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
关键词
CENTRAL VEIN STENOSIS; ANGIOPLASTY; OBSTRUCTION; MANAGEMENT; BYPASS;
D O I
10.1016/j.avsg.2010.12.020
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Autologous arteriovenous fistulas are frequently threatened by central venous obstruction. Although this is frequently ascribed to indwelling catheters and neointimal venous remodeling, we believe that extrinsic compression of the subclavian vein as it passes through the costoclavicular junction (CCJ) may play a significant role in a subset of dialysis patients. Methods: We reviewed our experience with CCJ decompression for arteriovenous fistula dysfunction at our institution. Decompression followed principles for venous thoracic outlet syndrome: bony decompression with thorough venolysis, followed by central venography through the fistula and endoluminal treatment, if necessary. Patients underwent transaxillary first rib resection, or claviculectomy in the supine position in cases when reconstruction was anticipated. In all cases, the minimum exposure included 360 degrees mobilization of the subclavian vein with resection of surrounding cicatrix to the jugular/innominate junction. Results: A total of 10 patients requiring decompression between November 2008 and February 2010 were included. All had severe arm swelling, four had dialysis dysfunction (postcannulation bleeding or maturation failure), two had severe arm pain, and one had a pseudoaneurysm. All patients had subclavian vein stenosis at the CCJ by venography or intravascular ultrasound. The majority of patients had balloon dilation (mean: 2.3 attempts) without success. Six patients underwent transaxillary first rib resection and four had medial claviculectomy. No patients required surgical venous reconstruction. In all, 80% of fistulas remained functionally patent, and all but one patient (who underwent ligation) had complete relief of upper arm edema. Median hospital length of stay was 2 days and mean follow-up was 7 months (range, 1-13). There was no mortality or significant morbidity. Five patients later required central venoplasty (four subclavian, mean: 1.8 attempts and one innominate) and three had stents placed (two subclavian, one innominate). Conclusion: A significant number of patients with threatened AV access owing to central venous obstruction have lesions attributable to compression at the CCJ. Surgical decompression by means of first rib or clavicular resection and thorough external venoloysis allowed symptom-free functional salvage in 80% of these patients, all of whom would have lost their access otherwise. Because surgical reconstruction is seldom needed, the transaxillary approach may be preferable to claviculectomy. This lesion should be specifically looked for, and principles of venous thoracic outlet syndrome treatment seem to apply and be effective.
引用
收藏
页码:640 / 645
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Saphenofemoral arteriovenous fistula as hemodialysis access
    João A Correa
    Luiz Carlos de Abreu
    Adilson C Pires
    João R Breda
    Yumiko R Yamazaki
    Alexandre C Fioretti
    Vitor E Valenti
    Luiz Carlos M Vanderlei
    Hugo Macedo Junior
    Eduardo Colombari
    Fausto Miranda
    BMC Surgery, 10
  • [32] Regarding "The effect of venous anastomosis Tyrell vein patch collar on the primary patency of arteriovenous grafts in patients undergoing hemodialysis" and "Effects of a venous cuff at the venous anastomosis of polytetrafluoroethylene grafts for hemodialysis vascular access"
    Freischlag, JA
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2000, 32 (06) : 1235 - 1236
  • [33] Creation of permanent hemodialysis vascular access in patients with failed arteriovenous fistula
    Moini, Majid
    Rasouli, Mohammad R.
    Rayatzadeh, Hussein
    SAUDI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 28 (02) : 213 - 215
  • [34] Lower Extremity Arteriovenous Hemodialysis Access: An Important Adjunct in Select Patients
    Carsten, Christopher G., III
    SEMINARS IN VASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 24 (02) : 102 - 107
  • [35] Drug-Coated Balloon for Arteriovenous Access Stenosis in Hemodialysis Patients
    Kim, Hyangkyoung
    KIDNEY AND DIALYSIS, 2021, 1 (01): : 20 - 28
  • [36] Arteriovenous access creation for hemodialysis patients with superior vena cava occlusion
    Luo, Qiuping
    Jin, Lizhu
    Duan, Zhiqiang
    Hu, Jia
    Cui, Tianlei
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR ACCESS, 2024,
  • [37] Effect of a rapid clinical protocol to the conversion from central venous hemodialysis catheter to arteriovenous access
    Blessios, George A.
    Park, Jeffrey M.
    Barone, Kathleen M.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR ACCESS, 2016, 17 (02): : 124 - 130
  • [38] Arteriovenous access creation and hazards of hospitalization and death in patients starting hemodialysis
    de Pinho, Natalia Alencar
    Prezelin-Reydit, Mathilde
    Harambat, Jerome
    Couchoud, Cecile
    Glaudet, Florence
    Combe, Christian
    Rondeau, Virginie
    Leffondre, Karen
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 39 (06) : 978 - 988
  • [39] Juxtaanastomotic venous aneurysms in arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis
    Jimenez-Almonacid, Pedro
    Pila, Ulises
    Gruss, Enrique
    Lasala, Manuel
    Antonio Rueda, Jose
    Colas, Enrique
    Martin, Libertad
    Garcia, Carlos
    Melone, Sirio
    Quintans, Antonio
    NEFROLOGIA, 2018, 38 (04): : 454 - 457
  • [40] Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices in Hemodialysis Patients: Prevalence and Implications for Arteriovenous Hemodialysis Access Interventions
    Saad, Theodore F.
    Ahmed, Waqas
    Davis, Karen
    Jurkovitz, Claudine
    SEMINARS IN DIALYSIS, 2015, 28 (01) : 94 - 100