Understanding the fouling mitigation mechanisms of alternating crossflow during cell-protein fractionation by microfiltration

被引:4
|
作者
Weinberger, Maria E. [1 ]
Kulozik, Ulrich [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, TUM Sch Life Sci, Food & Bioproc Engn, Weihenstephaner Berg 1, D-85354 Munich, Germany
关键词
Alternating tangential flow filtration (ATF); Flow reversal; Length dependent fouling; Cell retention; Fouling reversibility; Hydrodynamics; HYDRODYNAMIC DIFFUSION-MODEL; EXPERIMENTAL-VERIFICATION; YEAST SUSPENSIONS; FILTRATION; SHEAR; PERFUSION; FLUX;
D O I
10.1016/j.fbp.2021.11.003
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Alternating crossflow filtration is an emerging technology to mitigate fouling in crossflow microfiltration of cell-protein mixtures by periodically reversing the direction of flow. So far, it is understood that the anti-fouling effects are mostly related to the pressure fluctuations upon changing from forward to reversed flow direction and to a smaller extent to the flow reversal along the membrane as such. However, it is not yet clear how pressure fluctuations and flow reversal influence the axial distribution of fouling and the prevailing types of fouling. We conducted alternating crossflow filtrations of a model suspension containing yeast cells (4.2% dry matter) and bovine serum albumin (0.8 g l(-1)), where the duration and crossflow velocity of the forward and the backwards phase were varied independently. We found that the material, which deposits in the forward phase, can be better removed or loosened during the backwards phase, and vice versa, if forward and backwards flow conditions are equal in terms of time, crossflow velocity and overall transmembrane pressure. This leads to a detectable overall lower resistance due to deposit layer formation. Despite the positive effects of alternating crossflow filtration on filtration resistance, flux, and solute transmission, the less compact deposit layer also allows for an easier penetration of solutes and small particles into the membrane pores, which was detectable in terms of an increased ratio of irreversible fouling resistance. (C) 2021 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 143
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Transmission of and fouling by long chain molecules during crossflow microfiltration of algal suspensions: influence of shear
    Pongpairoj, Pharima
    Field, Robert
    Cui, Zhanfeng
    Wicaksana, Filicia
    Fane, Anthony G.
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2011, 35 (1-3) : 138 - 149
  • [22] Mechanisms of protein fouling in microfiltration. II. Adsorption and deposition of proteins on microfiltration membranes
    Zhang, JD
    Cai, ZL
    Cong, W
    Su, ZG
    Fan, PY
    SEPARATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 37 (13) : 3039 - 3051
  • [23] Fundamental Understanding of Fouling Mechanisms During Microfiltration of Bitter Gourd (Momordica charantia) Extract and Their Dependence on Operating Conditions
    Jain, Amit
    Sengupta, Sourav
    De, Sirshendu
    FOOD AND BIOPROCESS TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 11 (05) : 1012 - 1026
  • [24] Fundamental Understanding of Fouling Mechanisms During Microfiltration of Bitter Gourd (Momordica charantia) Extract and Their Dependence on Operating Conditions
    Amit Jain
    Sourav Sengupta
    Sirshendu De
    Food and Bioprocess Technology, 2018, 11 : 1012 - 1026
  • [25] Combination of crossflow and electric field for microfiltration of protein/microbial cell suspensions
    Chuang, Ching-Jung
    Wu, Chen-Yi
    Wu, Chia-Chun
    DESALINATION, 2008, 233 (1-3) : 295 - 302
  • [26] Contribution to the understanding of fouling build-up during microfiltration of wines
    Vernhet, A
    Cartalade, D
    Moutounet, M
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2003, 211 (02) : 357 - 370
  • [27] In-situ characterization of cake layer fouling during crossflow microfiltration of oil-in-water emulsion
    Tanudjaja, Henry J.
    Chew, Jia Wei
    SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 218 : 51 - 58
  • [28] Protein recovery from bacterial cell debris using crossflow microfiltration with backpulsing
    Parnham, CS
    Davis, RH
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1996, 118 (02) : 259 - 268
  • [29] Protein fouling during microfiltration: Comparative behavior of different model proteins
    Kelly, ST
    Zydney, AL
    BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING, 1997, 55 (01) : 91 - 100
  • [30] Effect of membrane morphology on the initial rate of protein fouling during microfiltration
    Ho, CC
    Zydney, AL
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1999, 155 (02) : 261 - 275