Cost-benefit analysis of net zero energy campus residence

被引:0
|
作者
Raffio, Gregory [1 ]
Mertz, George [1 ]
Kissock, Kelly [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dayton, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Dayton, OH 45469 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In response to both global and local challenges, the University of Dayton is committed to building a net-zero energy student residence, called the Eco-house. A unique aspect of the Eco-house is its cost effectiveness. This paper discusses both the design and cost-benefit analysis of a net-zero energy campus residence. Energy use of current student houses is presented to provide a baseline for determining energy savings. The use of the whole-system inside-out approach to guide the overall design is described. Using the inside-out method, the energy impacts of occupant behavior, appliances and lights, building envelope, energy distribution systems and primary energy conversion equipment are discussed. The designs of solar thermal and solar photovoltaic systems to meet the hot water and electricity requirements of the house are described. Eco-house energy use is compared to the energy use of the existing houses. Cost-benefit analysis is first performed on house components and then on the whole house. At a 5% discount rate, 5% borrowing rate for a 20 year mortgage, a 35 year lifetime, and an annual fuel escalation rate of 4%, the Eco-house can be constructed for no additional lifetime cost.
引用
收藏
页码:567 / 575
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cognition and cost-benefit analysis
    Sunstein, CR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES, 2000, 29 (02): : 1059 - 1103
  • [32] EQUITY IN COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    PEARCE, DW
    WISE, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 1972, 6 (03) : 324 - 325
  • [33] Cost-benefit analysis and the environment
    Sunstein, CR
    [J]. ETHICS, 2005, 115 (02) : 351 - 385
  • [34] Cost-benefit analysis of the RFA
    Dovich, Norman J.
    Soper, Steven A.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2006, 314 (5806) : 1682 - 1682
  • [35] UNEMPLOYMENT AND COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    BAXTER, ND
    HOWREY, EP
    PENNER, RG
    [J]. PUBLIC FINANCE, 1969, 24 (01): : 80 - 88
  • [36] THEORY OF COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    JONES, CR
    [J]. ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1968, 6 (04): : 333 - 333
  • [37] The discipline of cost-benefit analysis
    Sen, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES, 2000, 29 (02): : 931 - 952
  • [38] Rethinking cost-benefit analysis
    Adler, MD
    Posner, EA
    [J]. YALE LAW JOURNAL, 1999, 109 (02): : 165 - +
  • [39] Is cost-benefit analysis for everyone?
    Sunstein, CR
    [J]. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW, 2001, 53 (01) : 299 - 314
  • [40] Cost-benefit risk of renewable energy
    Hsu, K. -J.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND INVESTMENT ASSESSMENT III, 2010, 131 : 85 - 94