What is Right and What is Wrong in the Darwinian Approach to the Study of Religion

被引:3
|
作者
Szocik, Konrad [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Informat Technol & Management, Rzeszow, Poland
来源
SOCIAL EVOLUTION & HISTORY | 2019年 / 18卷 / 02期
关键词
CULTURAL-CHANGE SELECTIONISM; EVOLUTIONARY FRAMEWORK; CAPACITY;
D O I
10.30884/seh/2019.02.11
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
One of the greatest challenges for the study of cultural evolution is an explanation of processes and mechanisms of transmission of cultural traits. Darwinian approach is a promising and useful research program. However, it is worth to ask in what extent Darwinian account can provide appropriate and reliable explanation for origin and transmission of religious components. We can look for biological benefits provided by religious affiliation when we try to explain it in terms of survival and reproduction. However, biological evolutionary explanation cannot explain ultimately some unique human traits like religiosity. The focal point is if this approach can provide reliable explanation for specifically human cultural phenomena that only analogically can be found among some social animals. The key idea of this paper is that Darwinian approach to religion might explain only small part of human religiosity, and reliable explanation should combine Darwinian and cultural evolution, and cognitive account.
引用
收藏
页码:210 / 228
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Information needs in operating room teams: what is right, what is wrong, and what is needed?
    Helen W. L. Wong
    Damien Forrest
    Andrew Healey
    Hanieh Shirafkan
    George B. Hanna
    Charles A. Vincent
    Nick Sevdalis
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2011, 25 : 1913 - 1920
  • [22] Industrial waste as fertilizer: What's wrong? What's right?
    Goldstein, J
    BIOCYCLE, 1997, 38 (08) : 63 - 66
  • [23] What is right and what is wrong about evidence-based medicine?
    Julian, DG
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 14 (09) : S2 - S5
  • [24] The Liverpool Care Pathway: what went right and what went wrong
    Neuberger, Julia
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2016, 77 (03) : 172 - 174
  • [25] Executive Selection-What's Right ... and What's Wrong
    Hollenbeck, George P.
    INDUSTRIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-PERSPECTIVES ON SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2009, 2 (02): : 130 - 143
  • [26] WHAT IS WRONG WITH WHAT IS WRONG WITH MEM
    LECLERC, G
    PIREAUX, JJ
    APPLIED SPECTROSCOPY, 1994, 48 (08) : 973 - 976
  • [27] What's right and wrong with spirituality in the workplace
    Barrett, Richard
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SPIRITUALITY & RELIGION, 2009, 6 (03) : 261 - 268
  • [28] What is wrong with my right arm and leg?
    Abdulqawi, Rayid
    Ashawesh, Khaled
    Newman, Piers
    NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 120 (1259) : 67 - 68
  • [29] Acute pulmonary hypertension: What is wrong on the right?
    Greyson, Clifford R.
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2010, 38 (06) : 1486 - 1487
  • [30] On the undergraduate curriculum: What's right/wrong with it?
    McVeigh, J
    FUTURE OF GERMANISTIK IN THE USA: CHANGING OUR PROSPECTS, 1996, : 57 - 64