Water Use at Pulverized Coal Power Plants with Postcombustion Carbon Capture and Storage

被引:113
|
作者
Zhai, Haibo [1 ]
Rubin, Edward S. [1 ]
Versteeg, Peter L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Engn & Publ Policy, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
WET COOLING-TOWERS; CO2; CAPTURE; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1021/es1034443
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Coal-fired power plants account for nearly 50% of U.S. electricity supply and about a third of U.S. emissions of CO2, the major greenhouse gas (GHG) associated with global climate change. Thermal power plants also account for 39% of all freshwater withdrawals in the U.S. To reduce GHG emissions from coal-fired plants, postcombustion carbon capture and storage (CCS) systems are receiving considerable attention. Current commercial amine-based capture systems require water for cooling and other operations that add to power plant water requirements. This paper characterizes and quantifies water use at coal-burning power plants with and without CCS and investigates key parameters that influence water consumption. Analytical models are presented to quantify water use for major unit operations. Case study results show that, for power plants with conventional wet cooling towers, approximately 80% of total plant water withdrawals and 86% of plant water consumption is for cooling. The addition of an amine-based CCS system would approximately double the consumptive water use of the plant. Replacing wet towers with air-cooled condensers for dry cooling would reduce plant water use by about 80% (without CCS) to about 40% (with CCS). However, the cooling system capital cost would approximately triple, although costs are highly dependent on site-specific characteristics. The potential for water use reductions with CCS is explored via sensitivity analyses of plant efficiency and other key design parameters that affect water resource management for the electric power industry.
引用
收藏
页码:2479 / 2485
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Carbon capture from pulverized coal power plant (PCPP): Solvent performance comparison at an industrial scale
    Sharifzadeh, Mahdi
    Bumb, Prateek
    Shah, Nilay
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 163 : 423 - 435
  • [42] PULVERIZED COAL POWER-PLANTS - THE NEXT LOGICAL STEP
    BENNETT, SB
    BANNISTER, RL
    MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 1981, 103 (12) : 18 - 24
  • [43] Analysis of retrofitting coal-fired power plants with carbon dioxide capture
    Korkmaz, Oezguer
    Oeljeklaus, Gerd
    Goerner, Klaus
    GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES 9, 2009, 1 (01): : 1289 - 1295
  • [44] Development of Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies in Coal-Fired Power Plants
    Gao Shiwang
    Electricity, 2010, 21 (04) : 50 - 54
  • [45] TIME FOR THE NEXT STEP IN PULVERIZED COAL POWER-PLANTS
    BENNETT, SB
    BANNISTER, RL
    GIOVANNI, DV
    POWER ENGINEERING, 1981, 85 (05) : 60 - 63
  • [46] Latest performances and improvement perspective of Oxycombustion for carbon capture on coal power plants
    Perrin, Nicolas
    Paufique, Cyrille
    Leclerc, Mathieu
    12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-12, 2014, 63 : 524 - 531
  • [47] Flexible strategies to facilitate carbon capture deployment at pulverised coal power plants
    Ho, Minh T.
    Wiley, Dianne E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2016, 48 : 290 - 299
  • [48] HEAT RATE IMPROVEMENTS IN PULVERIZED COAL POWER-PLANTS
    BENNETT, SB
    BANNISTER, RL
    LEYENDECKER, RR
    VACCARO, FR
    GIOVANNI, DV
    DIMMER, JP
    POWER ENGINEERING, 1980, 84 (05) : 78 - 82
  • [49] TIME FOR THE NEXT STEP IN PULVERIZED COAL POWER PLANTS.
    Bennett, S.B.
    Bannister, R.L.
    Giovanni, D.V.
    Power Engineering (Barrington, Illinois), 1981, 85 (05): : 60 - 63
  • [50] Characterization of bottom ashes from coal pulverized power plants to determine their potential use feasibility
    Menendez, E.
    Alvaro, A. M.
    Argiz, C.
    Parra, J. L.
    Moragues, A.
    BOLETIN DE LA SOCIEDAD ESPANOLA DE CERAMICA Y VIDRIO, 2013, 52 (06): : 296 - 304