Water Use at Pulverized Coal Power Plants with Postcombustion Carbon Capture and Storage

被引:113
|
作者
Zhai, Haibo [1 ]
Rubin, Edward S. [1 ]
Versteeg, Peter L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Engn & Publ Policy, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
WET COOLING-TOWERS; CO2; CAPTURE; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1021/es1034443
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Coal-fired power plants account for nearly 50% of U.S. electricity supply and about a third of U.S. emissions of CO2, the major greenhouse gas (GHG) associated with global climate change. Thermal power plants also account for 39% of all freshwater withdrawals in the U.S. To reduce GHG emissions from coal-fired plants, postcombustion carbon capture and storage (CCS) systems are receiving considerable attention. Current commercial amine-based capture systems require water for cooling and other operations that add to power plant water requirements. This paper characterizes and quantifies water use at coal-burning power plants with and without CCS and investigates key parameters that influence water consumption. Analytical models are presented to quantify water use for major unit operations. Case study results show that, for power plants with conventional wet cooling towers, approximately 80% of total plant water withdrawals and 86% of plant water consumption is for cooling. The addition of an amine-based CCS system would approximately double the consumptive water use of the plant. Replacing wet towers with air-cooled condensers for dry cooling would reduce plant water use by about 80% (without CCS) to about 40% (with CCS). However, the cooling system capital cost would approximately triple, although costs are highly dependent on site-specific characteristics. The potential for water use reductions with CCS is explored via sensitivity analyses of plant efficiency and other key design parameters that affect water resource management for the electric power industry.
引用
收藏
页码:2479 / 2485
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Carbon capture effects on water use at pulverized coal power plants
    Zhai, Haibo
    Rubin, Edward S.
    10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, 4 : 2238 - 2244
  • [2] Flexible Operation of Coal Fired Power Plants with Postcombustion Capture of Carbon Dioxide
    Chalmers, Hannah
    Lucquiaud, Mathieu
    Gibbins, Jon
    Leach, Matt
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2009, 135 (06): : 449 - 458
  • [3] An adoption scenario for carbon capture in pulverized coal power plants in the USA
    Hanson, Donald
    Schmalzer, David
    GREENHOUSE GASES-SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 3 (04): : 303 - 308
  • [4] Performance and cost of wet and dry cooling systems for pulverized coal power plants with and without carbon capture and storage
    Zhai, Haibo
    Rubin, Edward S.
    ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (10) : 5653 - 5660
  • [5] Life Cycle Assessment for supercritical pulverized coal power plants with post-combustion carbon capture and storage
    Petrescu, Letitia
    Bonalumi, Davide
    Valenti, Gianluca
    Cormos, Ana-Maria
    Cormos, Calin-Cristian
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 157 : 10 - 21
  • [6] A preliminary analysis of increase in water use with carbon capture and storage for Indian coal-fired power plants
    Sharma, Naushita
    Mahapatra, Siba Sankar
    ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION, 2018, 9 : 51 - 62
  • [7] Cost Implications of Carbon Capture and Storage for the Coal Power Plants in India
    Rao, Anand B.
    Kumar, Piyush
    4 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN ENERGY RESEARCH (ICAER 2013), 2014, 54 : 431 - 438
  • [8] Life cycle water use of coal- and natural-gas-fired power plants with and without carbon capture and storage
    Ou, Yang
    Zhai, Haibo
    Rubin, Edward S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2016, 44 : 249 - 261
  • [9] The cost of carbon capture and storage for coal-fired power plants in China
    Hu, Bingyin
    Zhai, Haibo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2017, 65 : 23 - 31
  • [10] Environmental analysis of a German strategy for carbon capture and storage of coal power plants
    Schreiber, A.
    Zapp, P.
    Markewitz, P.
    Voegele, S.
    ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (12) : 7873 - 7883