Retrospective observational study of the effects of residual neuromuscular blockade and sugammadex on motor-evoked potential monitoring during spine surgery in Japan

被引:2
|
作者
Hayashi, Hironobu [1 ]
Yamada, Miki [2 ]
Okuyama, Kotoba [2 ]
Takatani, Tsunenori [3 ]
Shigematsu, Hideki [4 ]
Tanaka, Yasuhito [4 ]
Kawaguchi, Masahiko [1 ]
机构
[1] Nara Med Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Shijo Cho, Kashihara, Nara 6348522, Japan
[2] MSD KK, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Nara Med Univ Hosp, Div Cent Operat, Nara, Japan
[4] Nara Med Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, Nara, Japan
关键词
intubation; motor-evoked potential; neuromuscular blockade; rocuronium; sugammadex; DOSE-RESPONSE; ROCURONIUM; REVERSAL; PHARMACOKINETICS; AGENT;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000030841
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Given neuromuscular blockade (NMB) can affect the amplitude and detection success rate of motor-evoked potentials (MEP), sugammadex may be administered intraoperatively. We evaluated the factors affecting the degree of residual NMB (i.e., the train-of-four [TOF] ratio) and the relationship between TOF ratio and MEP detection success rate in Japanese patients undergoing spine surgery. This single-center retrospective observational study included adults who underwent spine surgery under propofol/remifentanil anesthesia, received rocuronium for intubation, and underwent myogenic MEP monitoring after transcranial stimulation. TOF ratios were assessed using electromyography. Sugammadex was administered after finishing the MEP setting and the TOF ratio was <= 0.7. To identify factors affecting the TOF ratio, TOF ratio and MEP detection success rate were simultaneously measured after finishing the MEP setting; to compare the time from intubation to the start of MEP monitoring after NMB recovery between sugammadex and spontaneous recovery groups, multivariable analyses were performed. Of 373 cases analyzed, sugammadex was administered to 221 (59.2%) cases. Age, blood pressure, hepatic impairment, and rocuronium dose were the main factors affecting the TOF ratio. Patients with higher TOF ratios (>= 0.75) had higher MEP detection success rates. The time from intubation to the start of MEP monitoring after NMB recovery was significantly shorter in patients administered sugammadex versus patients without sugammadex (P < .0001). The MEP detection success rate was higher in patients with a TOF ratio of >= 0.75. Sugammadex shortened the time from intubation to the start of MEP monitoring after NMB recovery.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of reversal of residual neuromuscular blockade on the amplitude of motor evoked potentials: a randomized controlled crossover study comparing sugammadex and placebo
    Lashmi Venkatraghavan
    Nathan Royan
    Sarah L. Boyle
    Michael Dinsmore
    Nancy Lu
    Kristina Cushman
    Eric M. Massicotte
    Atul Prabhu
    Neurological Sciences, 2022, 43 : 615 - 623
  • [22] Effects of sugammadex on incidence of postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade: a randomized, controlled study
    Brueckmann, B.
    Sasaki, N.
    Grobara, P.
    Li, M. K.
    Woo, T.
    de Bie, J.
    Maktabi, M.
    Lee, J.
    Kwo, J.
    Pino, R.
    Sabouri, A. S.
    McGovern, F.
    Staehr-Rye, A. K.
    Eikermann, M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2015, 115 (05) : 743 - 751
  • [23] Effects of Preoperative Motor Status on Intraoperative Motor-evoked Potential Monitoring for High-risk Spinal Surgery
    Kobayashi, Kazuyoshi
    Imagama, Shiro
    Yoshida, Go
    Ando, Muneharu
    Kawabata, Shigenori
    Yamada, Kei
    Kanchiku, Tsukasa
    Fujiwara, Yasushi
    Taniguchi, Shinichirou
    Iwasaki, Hiroshi
    Tadokoro, Nobuaki
    Takahashi, Masahito
    Wada, Kanichiro
    Yamamoto, Naoya
    Shigematsu, Hideki
    Funaba, Masahiro
    Yasuda, Akimasa
    Kobayashi, Sho
    Ushirozako, Hiroki
    Tani, Toshikazu
    Matsuyama, Yukihiro
    SPINE, 2021, 46 (12) : E694 - E700
  • [24] A Multiparametric Alarm Criterion for Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring During Spine Deformity Surgery
    Segura, Martin J.
    Talarico, Maria E.
    Noel, Mariano A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 34 (01) : 38 - 48
  • [25] MOTOR EVOKED-POTENTIAL MONITORING DURING UPPER CERVICAL-SPINE SURGERY
    KITAGAWA, H
    ITOH, T
    TAKANO, H
    TAKAKUWA, K
    YAMAMOTO, N
    YAMADA, H
    TSUJI, H
    SPINE, 1989, 14 (10) : 1078 - 1083
  • [26] Comparison of the Effects of Propofol and Sevoflurane Combined With Remifentanil on Transcranial Electric Motor-evoked and Somatosensory-evoked Potential Monitoring During Brainstem Surgery
    Hernandez-Palazon, Joaquin
    Izura, Virginia
    Fuentes-Garcia, Diego
    Piqueras-Perez, Claudio
    Domenech-Asensi, Paloma
    Falcon-Arana, Luis
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2015, 27 (04) : 282 - 288
  • [27] Sugammadex versus neostigmine for reversal of residual neuromuscular blockade after surgery: a retrospective cohort analysis of postoperative side-effects
    Schmidt, Marc
    Li, Kai
    Yang, Dongsheng
    Turan, Alparslan
    Sessler, Daniel I.
    Ruetzler, Kurt
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2021, 151 : 11S - 11S
  • [28] Protection of tongue from injuries during transcranial motor-evoked potential monitoring
    Mahmoud, Mohamed
    Spaeth, James
    Sadhasivam, Senthilkumar
    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2008, 18 (09) : 902 - 903
  • [29] Evolving Compartment Syndrome Detected by Loss of Somatosensory- and Motor-evoked Potential Signals During Cervical Spine Surgery
    Bronson, Wesley H.
    Forsh, David
    Qureshi, Sheeraz A.
    Deiner, Stacie G.
    Weisz, Donald J.
    Hecht, Andrew C.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2012, 35 (09) : E1453 - E1456
  • [30] Unilateral abnormality of initial motor-evoked potential in the upper limb detected during lumbar spine surgery: a case report
    Phoowanakulchai, Sirima
    Hayashi, Hironobu
    Oi, Ayako
    Takeshima, Yasuhiro
    Takatani, Tsunenori
    Kawaguchi, Masahiko
    JA CLINICAL REPORTS, 2024, 10 (01)