共 50 条
Experiences with the Philadelphia police assisted diversion program: A qualitative study
被引:11
|作者:
Anderson, Evan
[1
,2
]
Shefner, Ruth
[1
,3
]
Koppel, Rebecca
[1
,4
]
Megerian, Carine
[1
,5
]
Frasso, Rosemary
[6
]
机构:
[1] Univ Penn, Ctr Publ Hlth Initiat, 3620 Hamilton Walk,Anat Chem Room 141, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Sch Nursing, 418 Curie Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Sociomed Sci, New York, NY 10027 USA
[4] Camden Coalit Healthcare Providers, 800 Cooper St, Camden, NJ 08102 USA
[5] RTI Int, 3040 East Cornwallis Rd, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
[6] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Jefferson Coll Populat Hlth, 901 Walnut 54, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
关键词:
Diversion;
Harm reduction;
Policing;
DRUG POLICY;
INCARCERATION;
EMPLOYMENT;
RECOVERY;
LAW;
D O I:
10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103521
中图分类号:
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background: The U.S. relies far too heavily on punitive criminal justice strategies to address problems that are better prevented and resolved through social and health services. The resulting harms are especially large and longstanding for people trapped in the failed War on Drugs. Philadelphia launched a Police Assisted Diversion (PAD) program to address the highest rates of poverty, incarceration, and fatal overdose among large cities in the U.S. PAD enables police officers to connect people with supportive services in many instances that would otherwise result in arrest or through outreach when no crime is suspected. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 30 clients, 15 police officers, and 12 other personnel involved with the program. Data were gathered in 2019 and 2020 and analyzed using standard qualitative methods. Results: PAD represents a new less-punitive model for responding to illegal purchasing of drugs, possession of drugs, prostitution, and retail theft in Philadelphia. Clients reported mostly positive experiences with the program, identifying the primary benefits as avoided arrest and relational support from affiliated service providers. Police officers expressed support for the program in principle but skepticism about its effects in practice, questioning the quality of available services. Program personnel and police officers described multi-sectoral collaboration as essential to addressing frequent and diverse logistical challenges, including overly restrictive eligibility criteria, mistrust between police and service providers, and coordination across different neighborhoods. Finally, all three groups suggested that people can only benefit from service linkages when they are ready to engage and that inadequate access to resources like housing limits program effectiveness. Conclusions: The PAD program is a promising public health intervention for diverting people away from punishment and towards services to address unmet social and health needs. But increasing investments in training and in other supportive services is essential to sustainable and transformational change.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文