Higher rate of complications with uncemented compared to cemented total hip arthroplasty for displaced intracapsular hip fractures: A randomised controlled trial of 50 patients

被引:6
|
作者
Clement, N. D. [1 ]
van der Linden, Marietta [2 ]
Keating, J. F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Infirm Edinburgh NHS Trust, Dept Orthopaed & Trauma, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Queen Margaret Univ, Ctr Hlth Act & Rehabil Res, Edinburgh EH21 6UU, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
Total hip arthroplasty; Cemented; Uncement; Outcome; Function; NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY; FEMORAL-NECK FRACTURES; REPLACEMENT; HEMIARTHROPLASTY; SURVIVAL; DEATH;
D O I
10.1007/s00590-020-02808-x
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThe primary aim of this study was to compare the functional outcome of uncemented with cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) for displaced intracapsular hip fractures. The secondary aims were to assess length of surgery, blood loss, complications and revision rate between the two groups.MethodsA prospective double-blind randomised control trial was conducted. Fifty patients with an intracapsular hip fracture meeting the inclusion criteria were randomised to either an uncemented (n=25) or cemented (n=25) THA. There were no differences (p>0.45) in age, gender, health status or preinjury hip function between the groups. The Oxford hip score (OHS), Harris Hip score (HHS), EuroQol 5-dimensional (EQ5D), timed get up-and-go (TUG), pain and patient satisfaction were used to assess outcome. These were assessed at 4, 12 and 72 months after surgery, apart from the TUG which as only assessed as 6 months.ResultsThe study was terminated early due to the significantly (n=8, p=0.004) higher rate of intraoperative complications in the uncemented group: three fractures of the proximal femur and five conversions to a cemented acetabular component. There were no significant (p >= 0.09) differences in the functional measures (OHS, HSS, EQ5D, TUG and pain) or patient satisfaction between the groups. There was no difference in operative time (p=0.75) or blood loss (p=0.66) between the groups. There were two early revisions prior to 3 months post-operatively in the uncemented group and none in the cemented group, but this was not significant (log rank p=0.16).ConclusionThere was a high rate of intraoperative complications, which may be due to poor bone quality in this patient group. There were no ergonomic or functional advantages demonstrated between uncemented and cemented THA. Cemented THA should remain as the preferred choice for the treatment of intracapsular hip fractures for patients that meet the criteria for this procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:587 / 594
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Treatment of the displaced intracapsular fracture for the 'fitter' elderly patients: A randomised trial of total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for 105 patients
    Parker, Martyn J.
    Cawley, Shirley
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2019, 50 (11): : 2009 - 2013
  • [22] Internal fixation or arthroplasty for displaced cervical hip fractures in the elderly - A randomised controlled trial of 208 patients
    Parker, MJ
    Pryor, GA
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 2000, 71 (05): : 440 - 446
  • [23] Internal fixation compared with total hip replacement for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly -: A randomised, controlled trial
    Tidermark, J
    Ponzer, S
    Svensson, O
    Söderqvist, A
    Törnkvist, H
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2003, 85B (03): : 380 - 388
  • [24] Total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty in mobile, independent patients with a displaced intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck - A randomized, controlled trial
    Baker, R. P.
    Squires, B.
    Gargan, M. F.
    Bannister, G. C.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2006, 88A (12): : 2583 - 2589
  • [25] Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for hip fractures: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials
    Azegami, Shin
    Gurusamy, Kurinchi S.
    Parker, Martyn J.
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 21 (05) : 509 - 517
  • [26] Hemiarthroplasty versus internal fixation for displaced intracapsular hip fractures in the the elderly - A randomised trial of 455 patients
    Parker, MJ
    Khan, RJK
    Crawford, J
    Pryor, GA
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2002, 84B (08): : 1150 - 1155
  • [27] More complications with uncemented than cemented femoral stems in total hip replacement for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly A single-blinded, randomized controlled trial with 69 patients
    Chammout, Ghazi
    Muren, Olle
    Laurencikas, Evaldas
    Boden, Henrik
    Kelly-Pettersson, Paula
    Sjoo, Helene
    Stark, Andre
    Skoldenberg, Olof
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2017, 88 (02) : 145 - 151
  • [28] Randomized comparison of reduction and fixation, bipolar hemiarthroplasty, and total hip arthroplasty - Treatment of displaced intracapsular hip fractures in healthy older patients
    Keating, JF
    Grant, A
    Masson, N
    Scott, NW
    Forbes, JF
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2006, 88A (02): : 249 - 260
  • [29] Treatment of displaced intracapsular hip fractures with total hip arthroplasty: Comparison of primary arthroplasty with early salvage arthroplasty after failed internal fixation
    McKinley, JC
    Robinson, CM
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2002, 84A (11): : 2010 - 2015
  • [30] Uncemented total hip arthroplasty in patients 50 years of age or younger
    Dowdy, PA
    Rorabeck, CH
    Bourne, RB
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1997, 12 (08): : 853 - 862