Utilizing Telemedicine for Delivery of Postoperative Care Following Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:7
|
作者
Radtke, Steven [1 ]
Umeh, Randle [1 ]
Chavez, Martha [1 ]
Curiel, Zuleika [1 ]
Mendez, Karla [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas Tech Univ Hlth & Sci Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, El Paso, TX USA
来源
关键词
Gynecologic; hysterectomy; laparoscopic; postoperative; robotic; surgery; telemedicine; virtual; SATISFACTION;
D O I
10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_66_20
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: Determine if patient satisfaction is greater after delivering postoperative care via telemedicine following minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. Materials and Methods: University-based outpatient clinic; Randomized controlled trial (Canadian Task Force classification I). Females between 18 and 60 years of age scheduled to undergo laparoscopic hysterectomy or laparoscopic excision of endometriosis were invited to participate. Eligible patients were randomized to receive postoperative care either through a traditional office visit or via telemedicine. PSQ-18 satisfaction surveys were performed by phone after the visit. Results: Forty-one patients were analyzed out of which 25 were in the office group and 16 in the telemedicine group. Groups were homogenous to age (41.4 vs. 43.3 p. 48), body mass index (31.9 vs. 30.6 P = 0.52), distance in miles from home (12.7 vs. 12.4 P = 0.92), and parity (P = 0.51). PSQ-18 questionnaire was scored and each category was compared between the office and telemedicine groups. When comparing medians (interquartile range), the general satisfaction and time spent with doctor categories were significantly higher in the telemedicine group (4.0 [4.0, 4.5] vs. 4.5 [4.5, 5.0] P = 0.05), (4.0 [4.0, 4.5] vs. 4.5 [4.0, 5.0] P = 0.05). The remainder of the categories analyzed were not different between groups Technical Quality (4.0 [3.8, 4.5] vs. 4.5 [3.9, 5.0] P = 0.13), Interpersonal Manner (4.0 [4.0, 4.5] vs. 4.5 [4.0, 5.0] P = 0.34), Communication (4.5 [4.0, 4.5] vs. 4.5 [4.3, 5.0] P = 0.21), Accessibility and Convenience (4.0 [3.5, 4.5] v 4.0 [3.6, 4.5] P = 0.84). A chart review was performed, examining the first 30 days after surgery. One (4%) patient in the office group went to the ER after postoperative visit, and 0 in the telemedicine group (P = 0.42). Conclusion: Postoperative care via telemedicine after gynecologic surgery results in higher patient satisfaction.
引用
收藏
页码:148 / 153
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Randomized controlled trial of minimally invasive surgery using acellular dermal matrix for complex anorectal fistula
    Ba-bai-ke-re, Ma-Mu-Ti-Jiang A.
    Wen, Hao
    Huang, Hong-Guo
    Chu, Hui
    Lu, Ming
    Chang, Zhong-Sheng
    Ai, Er-Ha-Ti
    Fan, Kai
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 16 (26) : 3279 - 3286
  • [42] Postoperative pain of minimally invasive root canal treatment:a randomized clinical trial
    Kim, Do-hyun
    Choi, Yoon-woo
    Kang, Sumi
    Shin, Su-Jung
    Jung, Il-Young
    ODONTOLOGY, 2024, 112 (4) : 1307 - 1315
  • [43] Same-Day Discharge in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery: A Care Partner Perspective
    Micolucci, Savannah
    Van Deman, John
    Robinson, Erica F.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 143 (5S): : 24S - 24S
  • [44] Minimally Invasive Cordotomy for Refractory Cancer Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Viswanathan, Ashwin
    Vedantam, Aditya
    Hess, Kenneth R.
    Ochoa, Jewel
    Dougherty, Patrick M.
    Reddy, Akhila S.
    Koyyalagunta, Dhanalakshmi
    Reddy, Suresh
    Bruera, Eduardo
    ONCOLOGIST, 2019, 24 (07): : E590 - E596
  • [45] Postoperative analgesia for major gynecologic surgery: A prospective randomized trial of 3 regimens
    Vallejo, M
    Shannon, K
    Kaul, B
    Ramanthan, S
    Finegold, H
    Makishima, S
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1999, 88 (02): : U152 - U152
  • [46] Bowel preparation prior to minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial
    Jessica C. Sassani
    Kelly Kantartzis
    Liwen Wu
    Anthony Fabio
    Halina M. Zyczynski
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2020, 31 : 1305 - 1313
  • [47] Bowel preparation prior to minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial
    Sassani, Jessica C.
    Kantartzis, Kelly
    Wu, Liwen
    Fabio, Anthony
    Zyczynski, Halina M.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2020, 31 (07) : 1305 - 1313
  • [48] Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled prospective trial
    Farhad Mazoochian
    Patrick Weber
    Sara Schramm
    Sandra Utzschneider
    Andreas Fottner
    Volkmar Jansson
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2009, 129 : 1633 - 1639
  • [49] Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled prospective trial
    Mazoochian, Farhad
    Weber, Patrick
    Schramm, Sara
    Utzschneider, Sandra
    Fottner, Andreas
    Jansson, Volkmar
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2009, 129 (12) : 1633 - 1639
  • [50] Minimally invasive interval cytoreductive surgery: it's time for a randomized trial
    Melamed, Alexander
    Rauh-Hain, Jose Alejandro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2019, 29 (09) : 1339 - 1340