A Comparison of Outcomes between Lichtenstein and Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Hernioplasty for Recurrent Inguinal Hernia

被引:3
|
作者
Yang, Bin [1 ]
Zhou, Shengning [1 ]
Li, Yingru [2 ]
Tan, Jianan [1 ]
Chen, Shuang [2 ]
Han, Fanghai [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Mem Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 6, Dept Gen Surg, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
TENSION-FREE REPAIR; LEARNING-CURVE; CHRONIC PAIN; MESH REPAIR; METAANALYSIS; IMPACT; TRIAL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
There remain concerns about the optimal technique for repairing recurrent inguinal hernias because of the high risks of complications and recurrence. The aim of this study was to compare Lichtenstein hernioplasty with the transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) laparoscopic technique in the treatment of recurrent inguinal hernias. One hundred twenty-two patients who underwent surgery for recurrent inguinal hernia were prospectively randomized to receive either Lichtenstein (n = 63) or TAPP (n = 59) hernioplasty between January 2010 and December 2014. Baseline characteristics, intraoperative complications, and short- and long-term postoperative factors were evaluated. Preoperative factors were comparable between the two groups. The average follow-up period was 46.2 +/- 8.5 months. The two groups had similar intraoperative and short-term postoperative complication rates, whereas the rate of long-term postoperative complications was lower for the TAPP group than the Lichtenstein group (6.8% vs 23.8%, respectively, P = 0.012). The TAPP group had significantly lower visual analogue scale scores, fewer analgesics consumption, and faster recovery than the Lichtenstein group (P < 0.05). Chronic pain was more prevalent in the Lichtenstein group than the TAPP group (15.9% vs 3.4%, respectively, P = 0.031). The recurrence rate was 4.8 per cent for the Lichtenstein group and 1.7 per cent for the TAPP group, with no significant difference (P = 0.62). Both the Lichtenstein and TAPP procedures are safe and effective methods for repairing recurrent inguinal hernia with low incidence rates of life-threatening complications and recurrence. The TAPP procedure is superior to the Lichtenstein repair in terms of reduced postoperative pain, shorter sick leave, faster recovery, and better cosmetic results. Careful selection of the surgical procedures and implementation of technical essentials are necessary.
引用
收藏
页码:1774 / 1780
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Clinical outcomes of single incision laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair
    Ece, Ilhan
    Yilmaz, Huseyin
    Yormaz, Serdar
    Sahin, Mustafa
    JOURNAL OF MINIMAL ACCESS SURGERY, 2017, 13 (01) : 37 - 41
  • [42] Clinical comparison of modified TEP technique with open preperitoneal approach and transabdominal preperitoneal repair for recurrent inguinal hernia
    Li, Xiaohuan
    Xu, Luping
    Zhang, Jie
    Wang, Qingqing
    Jin, Qianhui
    MINERVA GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 69 (03): : 453 - 455
  • [43] A comparison of post operative pain and hospital stay between Lichtenstein's repair and Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) repair of inguinal hernia: A randomized controlled trial
    Salma, Umme
    Ahmed, Ishtiaq
    Ishtiaq, Sundas
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 31 (05) : 1062 - 1066
  • [44] Lichtenstein versus transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair for unilateral non recurrent hernia: A multicenter short term randomized comparative study of clinical outcomes
    Sultan, Ahmed Abd El Aal
    Abo Elazm, Hossam Attia
    Omran, Hisham
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2022, 76
  • [45] How I Do It: Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair
    Haskins, Ivy N.
    Perez, Arielle J.
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 30 (06): : 659 - 665
  • [46] Bilateral Inguinal Hernia Repair and Male Fertility: A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Lichtenstein vs Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal
    Damous, Sergio H. B.
    Damous, Luciana L.
    Borges, Victor A.
    Fontella, Amanda K.
    Miranda, Jocielle S.
    Koike, Marcia K.
    Saito, Osmar C.
    Birolini, Claudio A. V.
    Utiyama, Edivaldo M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2022, 235 (05) : S28 - S28
  • [47] Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair for a patient with Laugier's and inguinal hernia
    Yamamoto, Masaaki
    Takeno, Atsushi
    Toshiyama, Reishi
    Tokuyama, Shinji
    Kawai, Kenji
    Takahashi, Yusuke
    Sakai, Kenji
    Hama, Naoki
    Kato, Takeshi
    Hirao, Motohiro
    SURGICAL CASE REPORTS, 2024, 10 (01):
  • [48] Stapled and nonstapled laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair - Reply
    Brough, W
    Royston, C
    Smith, A
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2001, 15 (07): : 767 - 767
  • [49] Intestinal obstruction following transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair
    Rodda, DJ
    Otto, GM
    Pese, KE
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1997, 67 (2-3): : 142 - 143
  • [50] Correction to: Comparison of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty and laparoscopic iliopubic tract repair for Nyhus type II hernia in women
    Sung Ryul Lee
    Jin Young Park
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2022, 36 : 1696 - 1696