Comparison of Lung Tumor Segmentation Methods on PET Images

被引:0
|
作者
Eset, Kubra [1 ]
Icer, Semra [1 ]
Karacavus, Seyhan [2 ]
Yilmaz, Bulent [3 ]
Kayaalti, Omer [4 ]
Ayyildiz, Oguzhan [1 ,3 ]
Kaya, Eser [5 ]
机构
[1] Erciyes Univ, Biyomed Muhendisligi Bolumu, Melikgazi Kayseri, Turkey
[2] Bozok Univ, Tip Fak, Nukleer Tip AD, Yozgat, Turkey
[3] Abdullah Gul Univ, Elekt Elekt Muhendisligi, Kocasinan Kayseri, Turkey
[4] Erciyes Univ, Develi Huseyin Sahin MYO, Melikgazi Kayseri, Turkey
[5] Acibadem Kayseri Hastanesi, Nukleer Tip Bolumu, Melikgazi, Kayseri Provinc, Turkey
关键词
segmentation; k-means; Otsu's tresholding; active contour; CANCER;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related deaths that occur all over the world. Recently, various image processing approaches have been used on PET images in order to characterize the uniformity, density, coarseness, roughness, and regularity (i.e., texture properties) of the intratumoral F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake. The first and important step of this kind of analysis is to differentiate tumor region from other structures and background, which is called segmentation. In this study, k-means, active contour (snake), and Otsu's tresholding methods were applied on PET images obtained from 36 patients and the performances were compared by the nuclear medicine expert in our team. The results show that Otsu tresholding approach is more selective.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of Automatic Blood Vessel Segmentation Methods in Retinal Images
    Maruthusivarani, M.
    Ramakrishnan, T.
    Santhi, D.
    Muthukkutti, K.
    [J]. 2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EMERGING TRENDS IN VLSI, EMBEDDED SYSTEM, NANO ELECTRONICS AND TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEM (ICEVENT 2013), 2013,
  • [42] COMPARISON OF SEGMENTATION METHODS FOR TISSUE MICROSCOPY IMAGES OF GLIOBLASTOMA CELLS
    Baltissen, D.
    Wollmann, T.
    Gunkel, M.
    Chung, I.
    Erfle, H.
    Rippe, K.
    Rohr, K.
    [J]. 2018 IEEE 15TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOMEDICAL IMAGING (ISBI 2018), 2018, : 396 - 399
  • [43] Comparison of segmentation methods on images of energy plants obtained by UAVs
    Pap, Melinda
    Kiraly, Sandor
    [J]. 2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUTURE IOT TECHNOLOGIES (FUTURE IOT), 2018,
  • [44] Radial snakes: Comparison of segmentation methods in synthetic noisy images
    Bessa, Jessyca Almeida
    Cortez, Paulo Cesar
    da Silva Felix, John Hebert
    da Rocha Neto, Ajalmar Rego
    de Alexandria, Auzuir Ripardo
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3079 - 3088
  • [45] New strategy for automatic tumor segmentation by adaptive thresholding on PET/CT images
    Moussallem, Mazen
    Valette, Pierre-Jean
    Traverse-Glehen, Alexandra
    Houzard, Claire
    Jegou, Christophe
    Giammarile, Francesco
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 13 (05): : 236 - 251
  • [46] Automatic segmentation of lung cancer based on texture features of PET/CT images
    Caldwell, Curtis
    Markel, Daniel
    Sun, Alexander
    Alasti, Hamideh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2011, 52
  • [47] Segmentation of lymphoma tumor in PET images using cellular automata: A preliminary study
    Desbordes, P.
    Petitjean, C.
    Ruan, S.
    [J]. IRBM, 2016, 37 (01) : 3 - 10
  • [48] Graph-based Unsupervised Segmentation for Lung Tumor CT Images
    Nian, Yongjian
    Li, Meng
    Cui, Haoran
    Hu, Xianling
    Xie, Bing
    Li, Ke
    Xiong, Xuanqi
    Xiao, Jingjing
    Chen, Wei
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2017 3RD IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATIONS (ICCC), 2017, : 1884 - 1888
  • [49] A survey of methods for brain tumor segmentation-based MRI images
    Mohammed, Yahya M. A.
    El Garouani, Said
    Jellouli, Ismail
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN AND ENGINEERING, 2023, 10 (01) : 266 - 293
  • [50] A Comparison of FDG PET-CT Tumor Segmentation for Clinical Application
    Wang, Wei
    Wang, Hongjun
    Li, Dengwang
    Yin, Yong
    [J]. MECHANICAL ENGINEERING AND INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, PTS 1 AND 2, 2012, 195-196 : 572 - 576