Nonroutine Use of Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Myocardial Infarction With Successful and Unsuccessful Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

被引:18
|
作者
Hawranek, Michal [1 ,2 ]
Gierlotka, Marek [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pres, Damian [1 ,2 ]
Zembala, Marian [4 ]
Gasior, Mariusz [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Silesia, Div Dent Zabrze, Sch Med, Dept Cardiol 3, Katowice, Poland
[2] Silesian Ctr Heart Dis Zabrze, Zabrze, Poland
[3] Univ Opole, Univ Hosp Opole, Dept Cardiol, Fac Nat Sci & Technol, Opole, Poland
[4] Med Univ Silesia, Dept Cardiac Vasc & Endovasc Surg & Transplantol, Silesian Ctr Heart Dis Zabrze, Sch Med,Div Dent Zabrze, Zabrze, Poland
关键词
cardiogenic shock; IABP; myocardial infarction; primary PCI; ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION; POLISH REGISTRY; COUNTERPULSATION; MANAGEMENT; MORTALITY; OUTCOMES; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcin.2018.07.030
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES The authors sought to compare outcomes of patients with myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock (CS) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with or without intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) support according to final epicardial flow in the infarct-related artery. BACKGROUND A routine use of IABP is contraindicated in patients with myocardial infarction and CS. There are no data regarding the subpoputation of patients who may benefit from such support besides patients with mechanical complications of myocardial infarction. METHODS Prospective nationwide registry data of patients with myocardial infarction and CS treated with PCI between 2003 and 2014 were analyzed. Patients were initially stratified into 2 groups according to final infarct-related artery Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade after PCI: those with successful primary PCI (TIMI flow grades 2 or 3) and those with unsuccessful primary PCI (TIMI flow grades 0 or 1). Outcomes of patients with or without IABP treatment in each group were analyzed and compared. RESULTS In the unsuccessful PCI group, patients in whom IABP was applied had tower in-hospital, 30-day, and 12-month mortality. IABP support in this group of patients was an independent predictor of lower 30-day mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59 to 0.89; p = 0.002). Conversely, in patients with successful PCI, IABP was an independent predictor of higher 30-day mortality (HR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.30; p = 0.0004). CONCLUSIONS IABP is associated with a tower risk of 30-day mortality in patients with myocardial infarction complicated by CS, in whom primary PCI was unsuccessful. (C) 2018 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:1885 / 1893
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Optimizes Myocardial Function During Cardiogenic Shock
    Dahlslett, Thomas
    Karlsen, Sigve
    Grenne, Bjornar
    Sjoli, Benthe
    Bendz, Bjorn
    Skulstad, Helge
    Smiseth, Otto A.
    Edvardsen, Thor
    Brunvand, Harald
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2018, 11 (03) : 512 - 514
  • [32] Intra-aortic balloon pump versus percutaneous Impella(C) in emergency revascularisation for myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: systematic review
    Frain, Kristina
    Rees, Paul
    PERFUSION-UK, 2024, 39 (01): : 45 - 59
  • [33] Usefulness of Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Counterpulsation in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock from Acute Myocardial Infarction
    Cheng, Jin M.
    Valk, Suzanne D. A.
    den Uil, Corstiaan A.
    van der Ent, Martin
    Lagrand, Wim K.
    van de Sande, Meike
    von Domburg, Ron T.
    Simoons, Maarten L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 104 (03): : 327 - 332
  • [34] Use of Intra-aortic Balloon Pump in a Japanese Multicenter Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Registry
    Inohara, Taku
    Miyata, Hiroaki
    Ueda, Ikuko
    Maekawa, Yuichiro
    Fukuda, Keiichi
    Kohsaka, Shun
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 175 (12) : 1980 - +
  • [35] Use of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock
    Barron, HV
    Pirzada, SR
    Lomnitz, DJ
    Every, NR
    Gore, JM
    Chou, TM
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 31 (02) : 135A - 135A
  • [36] Intra-aortic balloon pump use is not associated with reduced mortality in patients with cardiogenic coronary intervention
    Rathod, K. S.
    Jones, D. A.
    Iqbal, M. B.
    Dalby, M.
    Wragg, A.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2015, 36 : 74 - 75
  • [37] Meta-analyses on intra-aortic balloon pump in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction may provide biased results
    Acconcia, M. C.
    Caretta, Q.
    Romeo, F.
    Borzi, M.
    Perrone, M. A.
    Sergi, D.
    Chiarotti, F.
    Calabrese, C. M.
    Scavalli, A. Sili
    Gaudio, C.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 22 (08) : 2405 - 2414
  • [38] Intra-Aortic Balloon Counterpulsation in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
    Macas, Andrius
    Bukauskas, Tomas
    Suskeviciene, Ilona
    Baksyte, Giedre
    Pieteris, Linas
    Tamosiunas, Tomas
    Mundinaite, Audra
    Zaliunas, Remigijus
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2011, 47 (04): : 212 - 218
  • [39] INTRA-AORTIC BALLOON PUMPING FOR CARDIOGENIC SHOCK OF MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION - PROBLEMS FOR ANAESTHETIST
    HERLIHY, W
    BAILEY, R
    JUNIUS, F
    HARRISON, G
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 1974, 2 (01) : 91 - 91
  • [40] The use of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: Data from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2
    Barron, HV
    Every, NR
    Parsons, LS
    Angeja, B
    Goldberg, RJ
    Gore, JM
    Chou, TM
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2001, 141 (06) : 933 - 939