Surgical resident involvement differentially affects patient outcomes in laparoscopic and open colectomy for malignancy

被引:14
|
作者
Sippey, Megan [1 ]
Spaniolas, Konstantinos [1 ]
Manwaring, Mark L. [1 ]
Pofahl, Walter E. [1 ]
Kasten, Kevin R. [1 ]
机构
[1] E Carolina Univ, Brody Sch Med, Dept Surg, 600 Moye Blvd,2MA234, Greenville, NC 27834 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY | 2016年 / 211卷 / 06期
关键词
NSQIP; Resident; Outcome; Cancer; Morbidity; Oncology; SSI; Colectomy; LONG-TERM SURVIVAL; EVALUATING SURGERY RESIDENTS; PERFORMANCE RATING SYSTEM; COLORECTAL-CANCER SURGERY; 55,402 NSQIP PATIENTS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; OPERATIVE PERFORMANCE; QUALITY-IMPROVEMENT; ATTENDING SURGEONS; PARATHYROID SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.07.019
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: We evaluated effect of resident involvement on outcomes after laparoscopic and open colon resection for malignancy. METHODS: Patients undergoing colectomy were queried using the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. "Attending alone'' and "Resident'' cohorts were compared with primary end point of overall morbidity. RESULTS: Of 37,330 patients, residents were involved in 26,190 (70.2%) cases. Attending alone patients were older with higher vascular, cardiac, and pulmonary comorbidity. Univariate analysis demonstrated increased operative time (181.0 +/- 98.4 vs 138.7 +/- 77.0, P < .001), reoperation (5.7% vs 5.2%, P = .041), and readmission rates (11.9% vs 9.6%, P = .037) with resident involvement. Serious (16.0% vs 13.9%, P < .001), minor (17.5% vs 14.1%, P < .001), and overall morbidity (26.4% vs 22.5%, P < .001) were higher with resident participation. Mortality (2.0% vs 2.8%, P < .001) and failure to rescue (.8% vs 1.2%, P < .029) were lower with resident involvement. Resident involvement showed independent association with overall morbidity in both laparoscopic (odds ratio, 1.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.13 to 1.38, P < .001) and open cases (odds ratio 1.3, 95% confidence interval, 1.18 to 1.35, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Resident participation in colectomy for malignancy is associated with lower mortality at the expense of higher overall morbidity. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1026 / 1034
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Robotic versus Laparoscopic Colectomy for Colonic Adenocarcinoma: A Nationwide Analysis of Surgical Outcomes
    Thirunavukarasu, P.
    Gabriel, E.
    Attwood, K.
    Kuvshinoff, B. W.
    Hochwald, S.
    Nurkin, S. J.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 22 : S91 - S91
  • [42] Surgical and survival outcomes of laparoscopic colectomy for transverse colon cancer in elderly patients
    Yue, Meng
    Wang, Yue
    Kang, Zhen-Hua
    Wang, Xu
    Wang, Lei
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2019, 24 (05): : 1852 - 1860
  • [43] A novel rating system effectively differentiates resident surgical performance on an open colectomy animal model
    Lipman, Jeremy
    Marderstein, Eric
    Zeinali, Farhad
    Phitayakorn, Roy
    Schomisch, Steve
    Rosen, Michael
    Marks, Jeffrey
    Ponsky, Jeffrey L.
    Champagne, Bradley
    Delaney, Conor
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2008, 207 (03) : S89 - S89
  • [44] Trends and surgical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open pyloromyotomy
    William C. Kethman
    Alex H. S. Harris
    Mary T. Hawn
    James K. Wall
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2018, 32 : 3380 - 3385
  • [45] Trends and surgical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open pyloromyotomy
    Kethman, William C.
    Harris, Alex H. S.
    Hawn, Mary T.
    Wall, James K.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (07): : 3380 - 3385
  • [46] Opportunity cost in the evaluation of surgical innovations: a case study of laparoscopic versus open colectomy
    Chatterjee, Abhishek
    Chen, Lilian
    Goldenberg, Elie A.
    Bae, Harold T.
    Finlayson, Samuel R. G.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 24 (05): : 1075 - 1079
  • [47] Opportunity cost in the evaluation of surgical innovations: a case study of laparoscopic versus open colectomy
    Abhishek Chatterjee
    Lilian Chen
    Elie A. Goldenberg
    Harold T. Bae
    Samuel R. G. Finlayson
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2010, 24 : 1075 - 1079
  • [48] Use of NSQIP to Study the Influence of Resident Involvement on Surgical Outcomes Reply
    Raval, Mehul V.
    Ko, Clifford Y.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2011, 213 (01) : 196 - 197
  • [49] DOES RESIDENT INVOLVEMENT DURING LAPAROSCOPIC COLORECTAL SURGERY IMPACT PATIENT OUTCOMES? RESULTS FROM THE ACS-NSQIP.
    Advani, V.
    Markwell, S.
    Rakinic, J.
    Hassan, I.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2011, 54 (05) : E187 - E188
  • [50] Short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic colectomy with multivisceral resection for surgical T4b colon cancer: Comparison with open colectomy
    Miyo, Masaaki
    Kato, Takeshi
    Takahashi, Yusuke
    Miyake, Masakazu
    Toshiyama, Reishi
    Hamakawa, Takuya
    Sakai, Kenji
    Nishikawa, Kazuhiro
    Miyamoto, Atsushi
    Hirao, Motohiro
    ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2020, 4 (06): : 676 - 683