Maxillary protraction in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate Evaluation of soft and hard tissues using the Alt-RAMEC protocol

被引:1
|
作者
Dogan, Ege [1 ]
Seckin, Ozlem [2 ]
机构
[1] Private Clin, Dept Orthodont, Ali Cetinkaya Bulvari Servet Apartmani 14,Kat 1, Izmir, Turkey
[2] Ege Univ, Dept Orthodont, Fac Dent, Izmir, Turkey
关键词
Facial growth; Rapid maxillary expansion; Maxilla; Angle class III malocclusion; Orofacial cleft; CLASS-III MALOCCLUSION; REPETITIVE WEEKLY PROTOCOL; EXPANSIONS; CONSTRICTION; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1007/s00056-020-00220-y
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the hard and soft tissue effects and differences of the Alt-RAMEC protocol to the facemask and conventional facemask protocols in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Methods This prospective study was carried out with 30 patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate with skeletal and dental class III malocclusions who were referred to a university department of orthodontics. The patients were evaluated with the cervical vertebral maturation method and divided into two groups, each consisting of 15 patients. The patients in group I (mean age 10.00 & x202f;+/- 0.73 years) were treated according to conventional facemask protocol, and the patients in group II (mean age 10.07 & x202f;+/- 2.43 years) were treated according to the Alt-RAMEC protocol before facemask application. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were evaluated by using the Dolphin Imaging Software version 11.7. The skeletal, dentoalveolar and soft tissue differences and treatment times were evaluated. Results Group II demonstrated a 5.73 degrees increase in SNA, which was statistically significant, while this increase was 3.13 degrees in group I (p & x202f;< 0.001). Results for Co-A and A-PTV showed a significant increase for group II only (group I: 1.02 & x202f;mm, 1.06 & x202f;mm, group II: 3.02 & x202f;mm, 2.21 & x202f;mm; p & x202f;< 0.05 and p & x202f;< 0.01, respectively). In addition, group II presented significant increase for the values of ANB, N-A-Pg, SN/MP, Wits, U1-SN, U1-L1, U1-PTV, U1-FHP, U6-PTV, U6-FHP, overjet, Ss-PTV, UL-PTV and UL-S line (p & x202f;< 0.001). The treatment mean times were 7.3 months in group I and 4.7 months in group II (p & x202f;< 0.01). Conclusion Applying the facemask after having followed the Alt-RAMEC protocol induced more skeletal, dentoalveolar and soft tissue changes in comparison to the conventional facemask protocol in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 219
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Maxillary protraction in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate: Evaluation of soft and hard tissues using the Alt-RAMEC protocol; [Maxilläre Protraktion bei Patienten mit einseitiger Lippen-Kiefer-Gaumenspalte: Evaluierung von Weich- und Hartgeweben mit dem Alt-RAMEC-Protokoll]
    Dogan E.
    Seckin O.
    Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie, 2020, 81 (3): : 209 - 219
  • [2] Effects of Alt-RAMEC protocol with facemask therapy in cleft lip palate patients in a sample of Pakistani population
    Sami, Qurrat-ul-ain
    Ali, Batool
    Farooqui, Waqas Ahmed
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [3] Bite Force Changes in Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients Before and After ALT-RAMEC Protocol
    Shabbir, Sadia
    Sattar, Anam
    Sami, Qurat ul Ain
    Zia, Babar
    Pervez, Hana
    CLEFT PALATE CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2023, 60 (05): : 586 - 590
  • [4] Effects of Alt-RAMEC protocol with facemask therapy in cleft lip palate patients in a sample of Pakistani population
    Qurrat-ul-ain Sami
    Batool Ali
    Waqas Ahmed Farooqui
    BMC Oral Health, 23
  • [5] Soft tissue evaluation after maxillary protraction with RPE or with the ALT-RAMEC protocol A controlled 3D study
    Ozbilen, Elvan Onem
    Ari, Mustafa Onur
    Yilmaz, Hanife Nuray
    Biren, Sibel
    JOURNAL OF OROFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS-FORTSCHRITTE DER KIEFERORTHOPADIE, 2023, 84 (SUPPL 3): : 200 - 209
  • [6] Effects of maxillary protraction in unilateral cleft lip and palate
    Iwasaki, H
    Ishikawa, H
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 79 (05) : 1244 - 1244
  • [7] Evaluation of Facial Soft Tissue in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate Corrected Using Maxillary Protraction Appliances
    Uehara, Sayuri
    Honda, Aya
    Kawase-Koga, Yoko
    Chikazu, Daichi
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 32 (04) : 1480 - 1482
  • [8] Late Maxillary Protraction in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: A Retrospective Study
    Borzabadi-Farahani, Ali
    Lane, Christianne J.
    Yen, Stephen L. -K.
    CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2014, 51 (01): : E1 - E10
  • [9] Do we pay for maxillary protraction? Evaluation of the effects of Alt-RAMEC protocol and face mask treatment on root development
    Yilmaz, Berza Sen
    Seker, Elif Dilara
    Yilmaz, Hanife Nuray
    Kucukkeles, Nazan
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2022, 26 (03) : 3203 - 3211
  • [10] Asymmetric Maxillary Protraction for Unilateral Cleft lip and Palate Patients Using Finite Element Analysis
    Chen, Zhengxi
    Pan, Xiaogang
    Zhao, Ning
    Chen, Zhenqi
    Shen, Gang
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 26 (02) : 388 - 392