Shelter Efficiency of Various Shelterbelt Configurations: A Wind Tunnel Study

被引:8
|
作者
Li, Huiliang [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Wang, Yongdong [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Li, Shengyu [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Askar, Aikedai [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Wang, Haifeng [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Xinjiang Inst Ecol & Geog, Urumqi 830000, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[3] Xinjiang Univ, Coll Ecol & Environm, Urumqi 830000, Peoples R China
[4] Natl Engn Technol Res Ctr Desert Oasis Ecol Const, Urumqi 830000, Peoples R China
关键词
windbreak; airflow field; shelter efficiency; wind tunnel; plant arrangement; AIR-FLOW; WINDBREAK DESIGN; SPEED REDUCTION; VEGETATION; SINGLE; FIELD; SIMULATION; DENSITY; DRAG; TURBULENCE;
D O I
10.3390/atmos13071022
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The construction of protective forests in Nursultan is key to reducing near-surface wind speeds and snowstorm effects in urban areas. This study analyzed the effects of the number of plant rows and spacing of the shelterbelts on the flow field around protective forests to evaluate the wind protection benefits of the existing configuration of the shelterbelt in Nursultan and guide the construction of protective forests. We measured the airflow fields of four shelterbelts with different numbers of rows, seven double pure shelterbelts, and double mixed shelterbelts of arbors and shrubs with different spacings. The results showed that the airflow field around the shelterbelts can be divided into five characteristic regions based on shelter efficiency: a deceleration region before the shelterbelt, acceleration region above the canopy, strong deceleration region in the canopy layer, deceleration region behind the shelterbelt, and recovery region behind the shelterbelt. In terms of windproof ability, the wind protection benefits of a shelterbelt with six rows are the best in a single shelterbelt. Behind the shelterbelt, the wind protection benefits of double pure shelterbelts are greater than that of double mixed shelterbelts of arbor and shrub. On the contrary, the windbreak benefits of the latter are stronger than those of the former between the two shelterbelts.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Onion Routing Efficiency for Web Anonymization in Various Configurations
    Sochor, Tomas
    COMPUTER NETWORKS, CN 2013, 2013, 370 : 136 - 145
  • [32] Efficiency of Wireless Power Supply in Various Configurations of Coils
    Filipiak, Michal
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2016 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE COMPUTATIONAL PROBLEMS OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING (CPEE), 2016,
  • [33] WIND-TUNNEL TESTS ON A MODEL ANTENNA WITH DIFFERENT FIN CONFIGURATIONS
    LOMBARDI, G
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 1989, 11 (03) : 134 - 138
  • [34] Assessment of Spray Drift with Various Adjuvants in a Wind Tunnel
    Itmec, Medet
    Bayat, Ali
    Bolat, Ali
    Toraman, Muhammed Cemal
    Soysal, Alper
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2022, 12 (10):
  • [35] A wind tunnel and field evaluation of various dust suppressants
    Preston, Colette Alexia
    McKenna Neuman, Cheryl
    Boulton, J. Wayne
    JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2020, 70 (09) : 915 - 931
  • [36] SIMULATION STUDY ON WIND-SPEED DISTRIBUTION IN WINDWARD SHELTERED AREA OF SHELTERBELT
    ZHANG, Y
    ZHANG, HX
    KEXUE TONGBAO, 1987, 32 (10): : 694 - 698
  • [37] WIND-TUNNEL TESTS TO OPTIMIZE BARRIER SPACING AND POROSITY TO REDUCE WIND DAMAGE IN HORTICULTURAL SHELTER SYSTEMS
    PAPESCH, AJG
    JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 1992, 44 (1-3) : 2631 - 2642
  • [38] WIND TUNNEL STUDY OF WIND EFFECTS ON HELIOSTAT
    Gng, Bo
    Li, Zheng-Nong
    Li, Qiu-Sheng
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TENTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING FOR YOUNG EXPERTS, VOLS I AND II, 2008, : 1643 - 1648
  • [39] Wind tunnel observations about the shelter effect of porous fences on the sand particle movements
    Lee, SJ
    Park, KC
    Park, CW
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 36 (09) : 1453 - 1463
  • [40] Wind-tunnel tests study of shelter effects of deciduous farmland shelterbelts in arid and semi-arid areas
    Sai K.
    Zhao Y.
    Bao Y.
    Liu C.
    Ding G.
    Gao G.
    Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2021, 37 (05): : 157 - 165