Predator-prey body size relationship in temporary wetlands: effect of predatory insects on prey size spectra and survival

被引:11
|
作者
Gaston Jara, Fabian [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Comahue, CONICET, INIBIOMA, Lab Fotobiol, RA-1250 San Carlos De Bariloche, Rio Negro, Argentina
关键词
Andean wetlands; prey size structure; predator size; prey ontogeny; aquatic insects; PARABROTEAS-SARSI COPEPODA; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; HABITAT COMPLEXITY; FISHLESS PONDS; FOOD WEBS; PATAGONIA; SYSTEMS; GROWTH; LARVAE; VULNERABILITY;
D O I
10.1051/limn/2016011
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The effect of predators on prey size structure in aquatic communities has been well studied in lentic permanent habits, but less attention has been placed on temporary environments. The biota of seasonal Andean wetlands in Patagonia is basically formed by crustaceans, insects and pond-breeding amphibians. The dominant predators in these wetlands are macroinvertebrates, mostly aquatic insects. The main objectives of this study were to examine the seasonal and interannual variation in the body size of prey and predators in two temporary wetlands located in northwest Patagonia, during two consecutive hydroperiods and to evaluate the effect of different insect predators over different prey sizes and different ontogenetic stages of invertebrate and vertebrate prey. Prey size structure and predator size structure were affected by the wetland type and the sampling months and predator body size was not correlated with prey size structure. The experiments showed that small prey were the most impacted by predaceous insects and all predators showed size-limited predation. Although aquatic insects significantly reduced the number of prey in the predation experiments, they did not significantly affect the body size structure of prey in nature. In this sense, the diversity of aquatic insects with different predatory strategies could maintain the heterogeneity in prey size structure in the wetlands studied.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 216
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Environmental correlates of molluscan predator-prey body size in the northern Gulf of Mexico
    Calderaro, Luke A.
    Harnik, Paul G.
    Rillo, Marina C.
    PALEOBIOLOGY, 2024, 50 (01) : 70 - 84
  • [42] Season and prey type influence size dependency of predator-prey body mass ratios in a marine fish assemblage
    Reum, Jonathan C. P.
    Hunsicker, Mary E.
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2012, 466 : 167 - 175
  • [43] Effects of temperature and prey size on predator-prey interactions between bluefish and bay anchovy
    Morley, James W.
    Buckel, Jeffrey A.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MARINE BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY, 2014, 461 : 449 - 457
  • [44] Predator-prey interactions in size-structured fish communities: Implications of prey growth
    Olson, MH
    OECOLOGIA, 1996, 108 (04) : 757 - 763
  • [45] Survival analysis of a stochastic predator-prey model with prey refuge and fear effect
    Xia, Yixiu
    Yuan, Sanling
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL DYNAMICS, 2020, 14 (01) : 871 - 892
  • [46] Effects of prey quality and predator body size on prey DNA detection success in a centipede predator
    Eitzinger, B.
    Unger, E. M.
    Traugott, M.
    Scheu, S.
    MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2014, 23 (15) : 3767 - 3776
  • [47] Disentangling the effects of predator body size and prey density on prey consumption in a lizard
    Gonzalez-Suarez, Manuela
    Mugabo, Marianne
    Decenciere, Beatriz
    Perret, Samuel
    Claessen, David
    Le Galliard, Jean-Francois
    FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 2011, 25 (01) : 158 - 165
  • [48] Joint evolution of predator body size and prey-size preference
    Troost, Tineke A.
    Kooi, Bob W.
    Dieckmann, Ulf
    EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY, 2008, 22 (06) : 771 - 799
  • [49] PREDATORY BEHAVIOR OF THE PRAYING-MANTIS, TENODERA-ARIDIFOLIA .2. COMBINED EFFECT OF PREY SIZE AND PREDATOR SIZE ON THE PREY RECOGNITION
    IWASAKI, T
    JOURNAL OF ETHOLOGY, 1991, 9 (02) : 77 - 81
  • [50] Predator-prey interactions on the wing: aerobatics and body size among dance flies and midges
    McLachlan, A
    Ladle, R
    Crompton, B
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2003, 66 : 911 - 915