Institutional influence on syndicate structure and cross-border leveraged buyouts

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Chen [1 ]
Purda, Lynnette [2 ]
Zhu, Hui [3 ]
机构
[1] Trinity Western Univ, Sch Business, Langley, BC, Canada
[2] Queens Univ, Smith Sch Business, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
[3] Ontario Tech Univ, Fac Business & Informat Technol, Oshawa, ON, Canada
关键词
Institutional Environment; Leveraged Buyouts; Private Equity; Syndicates; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; CULTURAL DISTANCE; VALUE CREATION; PRIVATE; LAW; DETERMINANTS; ACQUISITIONS; INVESTMENT; DECISIONS; INDUSTRY;
D O I
10.1111/fima.12315
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We explore the extent to which differences in countries' formal and informal institutions reduce cross-border leveraged buyout transactions and the potential influence these same institutions have on how private equity (PE) investors choose to enter these transactions. Although institutional differences have frequently been viewed as barriers to cross-border investment, we find evidence that these same differences may motivate a PE firm's decision to enter the transaction with a syndicate of firms rather than undertaking the transaction on their own. Cultural differences between a PE firm and the target nation are significantly related to the choice to enter the deal via a multinational syndicate. The varying nationalities within the syndicate contribute to enhanced familiarity, with average institutional distances between the syndicate and target firms being significantly lower than for single-PE-led deals. Overall, deals undertaken by syndicates are more likely to be successfully completed and require less time in negotiation. These results persist even after accounting for selection bias with regard to target country choice. We explore whether other features of the syndicate are responsible for improved deal outcomes, such as repeated transactions with the same partners, but find no evidence that this is the case.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 202
页数:34
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Creating institutional preconditions for knowledge flows in cross-border regions
    Miorner, Johan
    Zukauskaite, Elena
    Trippl, Michaela
    Moodysson, Jerker
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-POLITICS AND SPACE, 2018, 36 (02) : 201 - 218
  • [32] INSTITUTIONAL PROVISION OF TARIFF AND NONTARIFF REGULATION OF CROSS-BORDER TRADE
    Shlapak, Alla
    Yatsenko, Olha
    Tananaiko, Tetiana
    Lyskova, Lesia
    [J]. ECONOMICS ECOLOGY SOCIUM, 2023, 7 (02): : 1 - 23
  • [33] CORPORATE CAPITAL STRUCTURE DECISIONS - EVIDENCE FROM LEVERAGED BUYOUTS
    RODEN, DM
    LEWELLEN, WG
    [J]. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 1995, 24 (02) : 76 - 87
  • [34] Cross-Border Collaboration in Economic Development: Institutional Change on the Anglo-Scottish Border
    Peck, Frank
    Mulvey, Gail
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BORDERLANDS STUDIES, 2018, 33 (01) : 69 - 84
  • [35] INSTITUTIONAL OBSTACLES IN CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION BETWEEN ROMANIA AND REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
    Carbune, Anatolie
    Chiriac, Roxana-Mihaela
    [J]. EUROPEAN FINANCE, BUSINESS AND REGULATION (EUFIRE 2020), 2020, : 111 - 119
  • [36] Can Cross-border Cooperation Boost Cross-border Ethical Governance?
    Nadalutti, Elisabetta
    [J]. JCMS-JOURNAL OF COMMON MARKET STUDIES, 2020, 58 (06) : 1377 - 1392
  • [37] INSTITUTIONAL DIMENTIONS OF CROSS-BORDER TRANSPORT - Introduction to the Theme of the Special Issue -
    Rietveld, Piet
    Stough, Roger R.
    [J]. IATSS RESEARCH, 2005, 29 (02) : 6 - 8
  • [38] The Performance Impact of Informal and Formal Institutional Differences in Cross-Border Alliances
    Golesorkhi, Sougand
    Mersland, Roy
    Randoy, Trond
    Shenkar, Oded
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2019, 28 (01) : 104 - 118
  • [39] Cross-border topographic mapping, cross-border orienteering: the Hungarian overview
    Zentai, Laszlo
    Gercsak, Gabor
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARTOGRAPHY, 2019, 5 (2-3) : 255 - 268
  • [40] Influence of RMB Cross-border Settlement on the Chinese Economy
    Xu, Qiyuan
    He, Fan
    [J]. CHINA & WORLD ECONOMY, 2016, 24 (01) : 104 - 122