Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) is comparable to mycophenolate mofetil in de novo heart transplant patients. Twelve months efficacy and safety results.

被引:0
|
作者
Kobashigawa, JA [1 ]
Gerosa, G [1 ]
Caforio, A [1 ]
Renlund, DG [1 ]
Ross, H [1 ]
Yonan, N [1 ]
Hummel, M [1 ]
Segovia, J [1 ]
Almenar, L [1 ]
Brambilla, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
347
引用
收藏
页码:244 / 244
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Efficacy and safety of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in patients with de novo and maintenance renal transplantation
    Qin, Y.
    Zhang, F.
    Shen, B.
    Liu, Y.
    Qiu, J.
    Guo, Y.
    Fan, Y.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2014, 68 : 17 - 22
  • [42] Influence of the Proton-Pump Inhibitor Pantoprazole on Mycophenolic Acid Pharmacokinetics: A Comparison of Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) and Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium (EC-MPS)
    Rupprecht, K.
    Kees, F.
    Schmidt, Ch.
    Raspe, A.
    Bucher, M.
    Schweda, F.
    Shipkova, M.
    Faerber, L.
    Fischer, W.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 9 : 510 - 510
  • [43] Correlation between mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) pharmacokinetic profile in stable renal transplant (RT) patients treated with tacrolimus (FK) without steroids
    Puig, J. M.
    Mir, M.
    Marin, M.
    Ferrer, M.
    Barrios, C.
    Barbosa, F.
    Vazquez, S.
    Rodriguez, E.
    Lloveras, J.
    [J]. TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 20 : 113 - 113
  • [44] Pharmacokinetics (PK) of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS, Myfortic®) in stable renal transplant patients with Neoral® or Tacrolimus.
    Kaplan, B
    Meier-Kriesche, HU
    Minnick, P
    Bastien, MC
    Sechaud, R
    Yeh, CM
    Balez, S
    Picard, F
    Schmouder, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2003, 14 : 910A - 910A
  • [45] Everolimus/enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) therapy after calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal in de novo renal transplant patients: final outcomes of the ZEUS study
    Arns, W.
    Becker, T.
    Pietruck, F.
    Sommerer, C.
    Reinke, P.
    Eisenberger, U.
    Fischer, W.
    Kramer, S.
    Budde, K.
    [J]. MEDIZINISCHE KLINIK, 2009, 104 (01): : 94 - 94
  • [46] The Effect of Food on Exposure to Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium (EC-MPS) in Kidney Transplant Recipients (KTR) ... Is It Clinically Significant?
    Lee, S.
    Truax, C.
    Kenyon, N.
    Raphael, K.
    Corbett, J.
    Smith, L.
    Shihab, F.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 11 : 444 - 444
  • [47] THE MAXIMUM TOLERATED DOSE OF MYCOPHENOLIC ACID (MPA) IS HIGHER WITH ENTERIC-COATED MYCOPHENOLATE SODIUM (EC-MPS) COMPARED TO MYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL (MMF) IN KIDNEY TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS: RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED, MULTICENTER TRIAL
    Shehata, Magdi
    Bhandari, Sunil
    Venkat-Raman, Gopalakrishnan
    Moore, Richard
    D'Souza, Richard
    [J]. TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 22 : 109 - 110
  • [48] Addition of enteric coated sodium mycophenolate (EC-MPS) for steroid withdrawal in maintenance renal transplant patients
    Citterio, Franco
    Sandrini, Silvio
    Altieri, Paolo
    Romagnoli, Jacopo
    Tondolo, Vincenzo
    Vinaccia, Vincenza
    Corbetta, Giuseppe
    [J]. TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 20 : 124 - 124
  • [49] Renal transplant patients with gastrointestinal intolerability to mycophenolate mofetil: Conversion to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium
    Calvo, N.
    Sanchez-Fructuoso, A. I.
    Conesa, J.
    Moreno, A.
    Barrientos, A.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 38 (08) : 2396 - 2397
  • [50] Improved Rejection Prophylaxis from an Initial Intensified Dosing Regimen of Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium (EC-MPS) in De Novo Renal Transplant Recipients.
    Budde, K.
    Tedesco-Silva, H.
    Arns, W.
    Zeier, M.
    Shoker, A.
    del Castillo, D.
    Grandaliano, G.
    Kiberd, B.
    Walker, R.
    Kawakami, F. T.
    Kuypers, D.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 10 : 393 - 393