NEW FRONTIERS OF LAND AND WATER COMMODIFICATION: SOCIO-ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROVERSIES OF LARGE-SCALE LAND ACQUISITIONS

被引:47
|
作者
D'Odorico, Paolo [1 ,2 ]
Rulli, Maria Cristina [3 ]
Dell'Angelo, Jampel [2 ,4 ]
Davis, Kyle Frankel [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Environm Sci Policy & Management, 133 Mulford Hall 3116, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ Virginia, Dept Environm Sci, 291 McCormick Rd, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
[3] Politecn Milan, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Inst Environm Studies, Dept Environm Policy Anal, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Columbia Univ, Earth Inst, Hogan Hall,2910 Broadway, New York, NY 10025 USA
[6] Nature Conservancy, 322 8th Ave, New York, NY 10001 USA
关键词
large-scale land acquisitions; water grabbing; land grabbing; deforestation; land degradation; GLOBAL LAND; POLITICAL-ECONOMY; CHANGE SCIENCE; FOOD SECURITY; RUSH; DISPLACEMENT; INVESTMENTS; RIGHTS; GLOBALIZATION; APPROPRIATION;
D O I
10.1002/ldr.2750
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A growing number of regions in the developing world are targeted by transnational investors who are acquiring large amounts of land and natural resources. Driven by the increasing global demand for agricultural products, such investments are often considered an opportunity for economic development in the target country. However, there are concerns about the social and environmental impacts on local communities. In this brief review, we discuss some key socio-environmental controversies surrounding large-scale land acquisitions (LSLAs). LSLAs often target common property systems and lead to privatization and commodification of land through long-term land concessions. There is a debate between supporters of foreign land investments as a means to attract modern agricultural technology that would decrease the yield gap in underperforming agricultural land and those who question such a development model because it is seldom coupled with policy instruments that would ensure that the benefits improve food security in local populations. Large-scale land investments displace a variety of systems of production ranging from small-scale farming to (arguably) "unused" land such as forests and savannas on which local communities often depend. Moreover, LSLAs entail an appropriation of water resources that may negatively impact local farmers or downstream human and natural systems. In most cases, investors keep the land fallow but, when they put it under productive use, they typically change land cover and land use to start intensified commercial farming, often for nonfood crops. Copyright (c) 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:2234 / 2244
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条