Validation of a GPU-based Monte Carlo code (gPMC) for proton radiation therapy: clinical cases study

被引:40
|
作者
Giantsoudi, Drosoula [1 ,2 ]
Schuemann, Jan [1 ,2 ]
Jia, Xun [3 ]
Dowdell, Stephen [4 ]
Jiang, Steve [3 ]
Paganetti, Harald [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[3] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Radiat Oncol, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[4] Shoalhaven Canc Care Ctr, Nowra, NSW, Australia
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2015年 / 60卷 / 06期
关键词
Monte Carlo; GPU; gPMC; clinical validation; proton radiation therapy; RANGE UNCERTAINTIES; DOSE CALCULATION; ELECTRON-TRANSPORT; DISTRIBUTIONS; SIMULATION; ALGORITHM; GEANT4; TOPAS;
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/60/6/2257
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Monte Carlo (MC) methods are recognized as the gold-standard for dose calculation, however they have not replaced analytical methods up to now due to their lengthy calculation times. GPU-based applications allow MC dose calculations to be performed on time scales comparable to conventional analytical algorithms. This study focuses on validating our GPU-based MC code for proton dose calculation (gPMC) using an experimentally validated multi-purpose MC code (TOPAS) and compare their performance for clinical patient cases. Clinical cases from five treatment sites were selected covering the full range from very homogeneous patient geometries (liver) to patients with high geometrical complexity (air cavities and density heterogeneities in head-and-neck and lung patients) and from short beam range (breast) to large beam range (prostate). Both gPMC and TOPAS were used to calculate 3D dose distributions for all patients. Comparisons were performed based on target coverage indices (mean dose, V-95, D-98, D-50, D-02) and gamma index distributions. Dosimetric indices differed less than 2% between TOPAS and gPMC dose distributions for most cases. Gamma index analysis with 1%/1 mm criterion resulted in a passing rate of more than 94% of all patient voxels receiving more than 10% of the mean target dose, for all patients except for prostate cases. Although clinically insignificant, gPMC resulted in systematic underestimation of target dose for prostate cases by 1-2% compared to TOPAS. Correspondingly the gamma index analysis with 1%/1 mm criterion failed for most beams for this site, while for 2%/1 mm criterion passing rates of more than 94.6% of all patient voxels were observed. For the same initial number of simulated particles, calculation time for a single beam for a typical head and neck patient plan decreased from 4 CPU hours per million particles (2.8-2.9 GHz Intel X5600) for TOPAS to 2.4 s per million particles (NVIDIA TESLA C2075) for gPMC. Excellent agreement was demonstrated between our fast GPU-based MC code (gPMC) and a previously extensively validated multi-purpose MC code (TOPAS) for a comprehensive set of clinical patient cases. This shows that MC dose calculations in proton therapy can be performed on time scales comparable to analytical algorithms with accuracy comparable to state-of-the-art CPU-based MC codes.
引用
收藏
页码:2257 / 2269
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] MOQUI: an open-source GPU-based Monte Carlo code for proton dose calculation with efficient data structure
    Lee, Hoyeon
    Shin, Jungwook
    Verburg, Joost M.
    Bobic, Mislav
    Winey, Brian
    Schuemann, Jan
    Paganetti, Harald
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2022, 67 (17):
  • [22] Development of a Nuclear Medicine Dosimetry Module for the GPU-Based Monte Carlo Code ARCHER
    Liu, T.
    Lin, H.
    Xu, X.
    Stabin, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3661 - 3661
  • [23] A new approach to integrate GPU-based Monte Carlo simulation into inverse treatment plan optimization for proton therapy
    Li, Yongbao
    Tian, Zhen
    Song, Ting
    Wu, Zhaoxia
    Liu, Yaqiang
    Jiang, Steve
    Jia, Xun
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2017, 62 (01): : 289 - 305
  • [24] Validation and clinical implementation of an accurate Monte Carlo code for pencil beam scanning proton therapy
    Huang, Sheng
    Kang, Minglei
    Souris, Kevin
    Ainsley, Christopher
    Solberg, Timothy D.
    McDonough, James E.
    Simone, Charles B.
    Lin, Liyong
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 19 (05): : 558 - 572
  • [25] Study of a GPU-based parallel computing method for the Monte Carlo program
    Luo Zhi-Fei
    Qiu Rui
    Li Ming
    Wu Zhen
    Zeng Zhi
    Li Jun-Li
    NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNIQUES, 2014, 25
  • [26] Study of a GPU-based parallel computing method for the Monte Carlo program
    罗志飞
    邱睿
    李明
    武祯
    曾志
    李君利
    NuclearScienceandTechniques, 2014, 25(S1) (S1) : 31 - 34
  • [27] Clinical validation of a GPU-based MC dose engine of a commercial TPS for PBS proton therapy
    Fracchiolla, F.
    Engwall, E.
    Janson, M.
    Tamm, F.
    Lorentini, S.
    Fellin, F.
    Bertolini, M.
    Algranati, C.
    Righetto, R.
    Farace, P.
    Amichetti, M.
    Schwarz, M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 161 : S1329 - S1330
  • [28] GPU-Based Monte Carlo Simulation for the Gibbs Ensemble
    Hailat, Eyad
    Rushaidat, Kamel
    Schwiebert, Loren
    Mick, Jason R.
    Potoff, Jeffery J.
    HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING SYMPOSIUM 2013 (HPC 2013) - 2013 SPRING SIMULATION MULTI-CONFERENCE (SPRINGSIM'13), 2013, 45 (06): : 75 - 82
  • [29] GPU-based Monte-Carlo volume raycasting
    Salama, Christof Rezk
    PACIFIC GRAPHICS 2007: 15TH PACIFIC CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER GRAPHICS AND APPLICATIONS, 2007, : 411 - 414
  • [30] Fast Dose Calculation for Magnetic-Resonance Imaging-Guided Radiation Therapy (MRIgRT) Using GPU-Based Monte Carlo Code ARCHER
    Liu, T.
    Lin, H.
    Yang, L.
    Liu, H.
    Wang, Z.
    Pei, X.
    Chen, Z.
    Xu, X.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 3131 - 3131