Validation of a GPU-based Monte Carlo code (gPMC) for proton radiation therapy: clinical cases study

被引:40
|
作者
Giantsoudi, Drosoula [1 ,2 ]
Schuemann, Jan [1 ,2 ]
Jia, Xun [3 ]
Dowdell, Stephen [4 ]
Jiang, Steve [3 ]
Paganetti, Harald [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[3] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Radiat Oncol, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[4] Shoalhaven Canc Care Ctr, Nowra, NSW, Australia
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2015年 / 60卷 / 06期
关键词
Monte Carlo; GPU; gPMC; clinical validation; proton radiation therapy; RANGE UNCERTAINTIES; DOSE CALCULATION; ELECTRON-TRANSPORT; DISTRIBUTIONS; SIMULATION; ALGORITHM; GEANT4; TOPAS;
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/60/6/2257
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Monte Carlo (MC) methods are recognized as the gold-standard for dose calculation, however they have not replaced analytical methods up to now due to their lengthy calculation times. GPU-based applications allow MC dose calculations to be performed on time scales comparable to conventional analytical algorithms. This study focuses on validating our GPU-based MC code for proton dose calculation (gPMC) using an experimentally validated multi-purpose MC code (TOPAS) and compare their performance for clinical patient cases. Clinical cases from five treatment sites were selected covering the full range from very homogeneous patient geometries (liver) to patients with high geometrical complexity (air cavities and density heterogeneities in head-and-neck and lung patients) and from short beam range (breast) to large beam range (prostate). Both gPMC and TOPAS were used to calculate 3D dose distributions for all patients. Comparisons were performed based on target coverage indices (mean dose, V-95, D-98, D-50, D-02) and gamma index distributions. Dosimetric indices differed less than 2% between TOPAS and gPMC dose distributions for most cases. Gamma index analysis with 1%/1 mm criterion resulted in a passing rate of more than 94% of all patient voxels receiving more than 10% of the mean target dose, for all patients except for prostate cases. Although clinically insignificant, gPMC resulted in systematic underestimation of target dose for prostate cases by 1-2% compared to TOPAS. Correspondingly the gamma index analysis with 1%/1 mm criterion failed for most beams for this site, while for 2%/1 mm criterion passing rates of more than 94.6% of all patient voxels were observed. For the same initial number of simulated particles, calculation time for a single beam for a typical head and neck patient plan decreased from 4 CPU hours per million particles (2.8-2.9 GHz Intel X5600) for TOPAS to 2.4 s per million particles (NVIDIA TESLA C2075) for gPMC. Excellent agreement was demonstrated between our fast GPU-based MC code (gPMC) and a previously extensively validated multi-purpose MC code (TOPAS) for a comprehensive set of clinical patient cases. This shows that MC dose calculations in proton therapy can be performed on time scales comparable to analytical algorithms with accuracy comparable to state-of-the-art CPU-based MC codes.
引用
收藏
页码:2257 / 2269
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validation of GPU-Based Monte Carlo Code (gPMC) Versus Fully Implemented Monte Carlo Code (TOPAS) for Proton Radiation Therapy: Clinical Cases Study
    Giantsoudi, D.
    Schuemann, J.
    Dowdell, S.
    Jia, X.
    Jiang, S.
    Paganetti, H.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 535 - 535
  • [2] A GPU-based fast Monte Carlo code that supports proton transport in magnetic field for radiation therapy
    Li, Shijun
    Cheng, Bo
    Wang, Yuxin
    Pei, Xi
    Xu, Xie George
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 25 (01):
  • [3] Recent Developments and Comprehensive Validations of a GPU-Based Proton Monte Carlo Simulation Package, GPMC
    Qin, N.
    Giantsoudi, D.
    Tian, Z.
    Schuemann, J.
    Pompos, A.
    Paganetti, H.
    Jiang, S.
    Jia, X.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3491 - 3491
  • [4] Evaluation of a GPU-Based Fast Monte Carlo Code for Proton Therapy Biological Optimization
    Taleei, R.
    Peeler, C.
    Qin, N.
    Jiang, S.
    Jia, X.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3506 - 3506
  • [5] Development of GPMC V2.0, a GPU-Based Monte Carlo Dose Calculation Package for Proton Radiotherapy
    Jia, X.
    Schuemann, J.
    Paganetti, H.
    Jiang, S.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)
  • [6] GPU-based fast Monte Carlo dose calculation for proton therapy
    Jia, Xun
    Schuemann, Jan
    Paganetti, Harald
    Jiang, Steve B.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2012, 57 (23): : 7783 - 7797
  • [7] Expanding a GPU-Based Monte Carlo Simulation Package for Proton Therapy
    Zhong, Y.
    Cheng, X.
    Hu, K.
    Xiong, Z.
    Shao, Y.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E167 - E168
  • [8] pGPUMCD: an efficient GPU-based Monte Carlo code for accurate proton dose calculations
    Maneval, Daniel
    Ozell, Benoit
    Despres, Philippe
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 64 (08):
  • [9] Clinical validation of a GPU-based Monte Carlo dose engine of a commercial treatment planning system for pencil beam scanning proton therapy
    Fracchiolla, Francesco
    Engwall, Erik
    Janson, Martin
    Tamm, Fredrik
    Lorentini, Stefano
    Fellin, Francesco
    Bertolini, Mattia
    Algranati, Carlo
    Righetto, Roberto
    Farace, Paolo
    Amichetti, Maurizio
    Schwarz, Marco
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 88 : 226 - 234
  • [10] Commissioning and clinical validation of FRED: Monte Carlo on GPU for proton beam therapy
    Garbacz, M.
    Baran, J.
    Battistoni, G.
    Durante, M.
    Gajewski, J.
    Krah, N.
    Krzempek, K.
    Patera, V.
    Pawlik-Niedzwiecka, M.
    Rinaldi, I.
    Sas-Korczynska, B.
    Scifoni, E.
    Skrzypek, A.
    Schiavi, A.
    Tommasino, F.
    Rucinski, A.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 133 : S1023 - S1024