Feature Modeling vs. Decision Modeling: History, Comparison and Perspectives

被引:11
|
作者
Rabiser, Rick [1 ]
机构
[1] Johannes Kepler Univ Linz, Christian Doppler Lab MEVSS, ISSE, Linz, Austria
关键词
Variability modeling; feature modeling; decision modeling;
D O I
10.1145/3307630.3342399
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Modeling variability, i.e., defining the commonalities and variability of reusable artifacts, is a central task of software product line engineering. Numerous variability modeling approaches have been proposed in the last three decades. Most of these approaches are based on feature modeling (FM) or decision modeling (DM), two classes of variability approaches that go back to initial proposals made in the early 1990ies, i.e., FODA for FM and Synthesis for DM. This extended abstract summarizes the history of FM and DM as well as the results of a systematic comparison between FM and DM published earlier. We also outline perspectives, especially regarding potential synergies and key common elements that should be part of a standard variability modeling language.
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 136
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Formal vs. Heuristic modeling for multitarget Bayes filtering
    Mahler, R
    SIGNAL AND DATA PROCESSING OF SMALL TARGETS 2004, 2004, 5428 : 342 - 353
  • [32] Rethinking Coherence Modeling: Synthetic vs. Downstream Tasks
    Mohiuddin, Tasnim
    Jwalapuram, Prathyusha
    Lin, Xiang
    Joty, Shafiq
    16TH CONFERENCE OF THE EUROPEAN CHAPTER OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS (EACL 2021), 2021, : 3528 - 3539
  • [33] Threads vs. Caches: Modeling the Behavior of Parallel Workloads
    Guz, Zvika
    Itzhak, Oved
    Keidar, Idit
    Kolodny, Avinoam
    Mendelson, Avi
    Weiser, Uri C.
    2010 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER DESIGN, 2010, : 274 - 281
  • [34] Experimental tests vs. theoretical modeling for FRC in compression
    Bencardino, F.
    Rizzuti, L.
    Spadea, G.
    FRACTURE MECHANICS OF CONCRETE AND CONCRETE STRUCTURES, VOLS 1-3: VOL 1: NEW TRENDS IN FRACTURE MECHANICS OF CONCRETE; VOL 2: DESIGN, ASSESSMENT AND RETROFITTING OF RC STRUCTURES; VOL 3: HIGH-PERFORMANCE CONCRETE, BRICK-MASONRY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS, 2007, 1-3 : 1473 - 1480
  • [35] Porter vs. Porter: Modeling the technological competitiveness of nations
    Elmer Yglesias
    Scientometrics, 2003, 57 : 281 - 293
  • [36] Physical vs. numerical dispersion in nonhydrostatic ocean modeling
    Vitousek, Sean
    Fringer, Oliver B.
    OCEAN MODELLING, 2011, 40 (01) : 72 - 86
  • [37] Modeling choices in quasigroup completion:: SAT vs. CSP
    Ansótegui, C
    del Val, A
    Dotú, I
    Fernández, C
    Manyá, F
    PROCEEDING OF THE NINETEENTH NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE SIXTEENTH CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIVE APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2004, : 137 - 142
  • [38] Modeling Hepatotropic Viral Infections: Cells vs. Animals
    Khoshdel-Rad, Niloofar
    Zahmatkesh, Ensieh
    Bikmulina, Polina
    Peshkova, Maria
    Kosheleva, Nastasia
    Bezrukov, Evgeny A.
    Sukhanov, Roman B.
    Solovieva, Anna
    Shpichka, Anastasia
    Timashev, Peter
    Vosough, Massoud
    CELLS, 2021, 10 (07)
  • [39] Roles: Object-oriented vs. cognitive modeling
    Sekharaiah, Chandra K.
    Gopal, U.
    Rakesh, U. G.
    Swapna, U.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 43 (3-4) : 607 - 607
  • [40] Making a mind vs. modeling the brain: AI...
    Dreyfus, H.L.
    Dreyfus, S.E.
    Informatica (Ljubljana), 1995, 19 (04):