Laparoscopic sacrospinous ligament fixation for uterovaginal prolapse: experience with 93 cases

被引:14
|
作者
Wang, Yanzhou [1 ]
Wang, Dan [1 ]
Li, Yuyan [1 ]
Liang, Zhiqing [1 ]
Xu, Huicheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Third Mil Med Univ, Southwest Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Chongqing 400038, Peoples R China
关键词
Uterovaginal prolapse; Sacrospinous ligament fixation; Laparoscopy; VAGINAL VAULT PROLAPSE; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY; URINARY-INCONTINENCE; SUSPENSION; HYSTERECTOMY; COLPOPEXY; REPAIR;
D O I
10.1007/s00192-010-1232-z
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to investigate the technique, efficacy, and safety of laparoscopic sacrospinous ligament fixation (LSSLF) for patients with uterovaginal prolapse. From May 2004 to December 2006, 93 patients underwent LSSLF at Southwest Hospital, Chongqing, China. All patients had either grade 3 or 4 uterovaginal prolapse. The surgical results and complications were evaluated. All patients had their surgery completed by LSSLF. The average time for LSSLF was 65 min. The average blood loss was 105 ml. Bladder was injured in four cases (4.3%). The mean follow-up was 18 months. Of the 93 patients, 87 (93.5%) had been cured of their vault or uterovaginal prolapse. Minor postoperative complications were observed. LSSLF can be successfully completed in patients with uterovaginal prolapse. It is a safe and effective treatment method for patients with uterovaginal prolapse. A long-term follow-up is necessary to detect therapeutic effect and late complication.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 89
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Anterior approach bilateral sacrospinous ligament fixation for vaginal vault prolapse
    Cespedes, RD
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2000, 56 (6A) : 70 - 75
  • [32] TRANSVAGINAL SACROSPINOUS COLPOPEXY FOR VAULT AND MARKED UTEROVAGINAL PROLAPSE
    CAREY, MP
    SLACK, MC
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1994, 101 (06): : 536 - 540
  • [33] The effectiveness of the sacrospinous hysteropexy for the primary treatment of uterovaginal prolapse
    Dietz, Viviane
    de Jong, Joyce
    Huisman, Marieke
    Koops, Steven Schraffordt
    Heintz, Peter
    van der Vaart, Huub
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2007, 18 (11) : 1271 - 1276
  • [34] Laparoscopic inguinal ligament suspension combined with hysterectomy for the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse
    Li, Chunbo
    Dai, Zhiyuan
    Shu, Huimin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2019, 45 (09) : 1918 - 1924
  • [35] A comparison of modified laparoscopic uterine suspension and vaginal hysterectomy with sacrospinous ligament fixation for treating pelvic organ prolapse
    Zhu, Hongxia
    Sun, Yixuan
    Zheng, Xuan
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2021, 13 (05): : 5672 - 5678
  • [36] Laparoscopic colposuspension to the Cooper's ligament after hysterectomy for uterovaginal prolapse
    Yoon, Won Sik
    Lee, Hae Nam
    Lee, Yong Seok
    Jeung, In Cheul
    Park, Eun Kyung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2013, 39 (03) : 714 - 719
  • [37] Uterine preservation or hysterectomy at sacrospinous colpopexy for uterovaginal prolapse?
    Maher, CF
    Cary, MP
    Slack, MC
    Murray, CJ
    Milligan, M
    Schluter, P
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL AND PELVIC FLOOR DYSFUNCTION, 2001, 12 (06) : 381 - 384
  • [38] The effectiveness of the sacrospinous hysteropexy for the primary treatment of uterovaginal prolapse
    Viviane Dietz
    Joyce de Jong
    Marieke Huisman
    Steven Schraffordt Koops
    Peter Heintz
    Huub van der Vaart
    [J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2007, 18 : 1271 - 1276
  • [39] Single incision apical mesh and sacrospinous ligament fixation in pelvic prolapse surgery
    Sardi, J.
    Prieto, J.
    Gomez, M.
    Cosentino, A.
    Farias, P.
    Maya, G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2018, 29 : S150 - S150
  • [40] Sacrospinous ligament fixation for pelvic organ prolapse in the era of vaginal mesh kits
    Yazdany, Tajnoos
    Wong, Keri
    Bhatia, Narender N.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 23 (05) : 391 - 395