Understanding Group Polarization with Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks

被引：1
|
作者：
Proietti, Carlo [1 ]
机构：
[1] Lund Univ, S-22100 Lund, Sweden
来源：
COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT | 2016年 / 287卷
关键词：
Group Polarization; Persuasive Arguments Theory; Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks; Value-Based Argumentation Frameworks; BELIEF POLARIZATION; ACCEPTABILITY; SHIFTS;
D O I：
10.3233/978-1-61499-686-6-41
中图分类号：
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号：
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要：
Group polarization occurs when an initial attitude or belief of individuals becomes more radical after group discussion. Polarization often leads subgroups towards opposite directions. Since the 1960s this effect has been observed and repeatedly confirmed in lab experiments by social psychologists. Persuasive Arguments Theory (PAT) emerged as the most convincing explanation for this phenomenon. This paper is a first attempt to frame the PAT explanation more formally by means of Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks (BAFs). In particular, I show that polarization may emerge in a BAF by simple and rational belief updates by participants.
引用
收藏
页码：41 / 52
页数：12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Labeled Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks
    Escanuela Gonzalez, Melisa G.
    Budan, Maximiliano C. D.
    Simari, Gerardo, I
    Simari, Guillermo R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH, 2021, 70 : 1557 - 1636
  • [2] Labeled bipolar argumentation frameworks
    Escanuela Gonzalez M.G.
    Budan M.C.D.
    Simari G.I.
    Simari G.R.
    [J]. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2021, 70 : 1557 - 1636
  • [3] Gradual valuation for bipolar argumentation frameworks
    Cayrol, C
    Lagasquie-Schiex, MC
    [J]. SYMBOLIC AND QUANTITATIVE APPROACHES TO REASONING WITH UNCERTAINTY, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3571 : 366 - 377
  • [4] Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks with Specialized Supports
    Nouioua, Farid
    Risch, Vincent
    [J]. 22ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TOOLS WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (ICTAI 2010), PROCEEDINGS, VOL 1, 2010,
  • [5] On the acceptability of arguments in bipolar argumentation frameworks
    Cayrol, C
    Lagasquie-Schiex, MC
    [J]. SYMBOLIC AND QUANTITATIVE APPROACHES TO REASONING WITH UNCERTAINTY, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3571 : 378 - 389
  • [6] Generalizing Complete Semantics to Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks
    Potyka, Nico
    [J]. SYMBOLIC AND QUANTITATIVE APPROACHES TO REASONING WITH UNCERTAINTY, ECSQARU 2021, 2021, 12897 : 130 - 143
  • [7] Computing Argumentative Explanations in Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks
    Zeng, Zhiwei
    Miao, Chunyan
    Leung, Cyril
    Shen, Zhiqi
    Chin, Jing Jih
    [J]. THIRTY-THIRD AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE / THIRTY-FIRST INNOVATIVE APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE CONFERENCE / NINTH AAAI SYMPOSIUM ON EDUCATIONAL ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2019, : 10079 - 10080
  • [8] Generalising Semantics to Weighted Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks
    Cordeiro, Renan
    Alcantara, Joao
    [J]. INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, PT I, 2022, 13653 : 520 - 534
  • [9] Collective Argumentation: The Case of Aggregating Support-Relations of Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks
    Chen, Weiwei
    [J]. ELECTRONIC PROCEEDINGS IN THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2021, 335 : 87 - 102
  • [10] Collective Argumentation: The Case of Aggregating Support-Relations of Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks
    Chen, Weiwei
    [J]. ELECTRONIC PROCEEDINGS IN THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2021, (335): : 87 - 102
12345