Directed self-regulated learning versus instructor-regulated learning in simulation training

被引:106
|
作者
Brydges, Ryan [1 ,2 ]
Nair, Parvathy [3 ]
Ma, Irene [4 ]
Shanks, David [3 ]
Hatala, Rose [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Wilson Ctr Res Educ, Univ Hlth Network, Dept Med, Toronto, ON M5G 2C5, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Wilson Ctr, Toronto, ON M5G 2C5, Canada
[3] Univ British Columbia, Dept Med, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[4] Univ Calgary, Dept Med, Calgary, AB, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
MEDICAL-STUDENT PROCEDURES; PEDIATRIC RESIDENTS; PATIENT OPINIONS; EDUCATION; PERFORMANCE; COMPETENCE; ATTITUDES; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04268.x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Medical Education 2012: 46:648656 Objectives Simulation training offers opportunities for unsupervised, self-regulated learning, yet little evidence is available to indicate the efficacy of this approach in the learning of procedural skills. We evaluated the effectiveness of directed self-regulated learning (DSRL) and instructor-regulated learning (IRL), respectively, for teaching lumbar puncture (LP) using simulation. Methods We randomly assigned internal medicine residents in postgraduate year 1 to either DSRL (directed to progress from easy to difficult LP simulators during self-regulated learning) or IRL (in groups of four led by an instructor). All participants practised for up to 50 minutes and completed a pre-test, post-test and delayed (by 3 months) retention test on the simulator. Pairs of blinded trained experts independently rated all videotaped performances using a validated global rating scale and a modified version of a validated checklist. Participants provided measures of LP experience and self-reported confidence. We analysed the prepost (n = 42) and prepostretention performance scores (n = 23) using two separate repeated-measures analyses of variance (anovas) and computed Pearson correlation coefficients between participants confidence and performance scores. Results Inter-rater agreement was strong for both performance measures (intra-class correlation coefficient > 0.81). The groups achieved similar pre-test and post-test scores (p > 0.05) and scores in both groups improved significantly from the pre- to the post-test (p < 0.05). On retention, a significant interaction (F2,42 = 3.92, p = 0.03) suggests the DSRL group maintained its post-test performance, whereas that in the IRL group dropped significantly (p < 0.05). Correlations between self-reported confidence and post-test performance were positive and significant for the DSRL group, and negative and non-significant for the IRL group. Conclusions Both IRL and DSRL led to improved LP performance immediately after practice. Whereas the IRL groups skills declined after 3 months, the DSRL groups performance was maintained, suggesting a potential long-term benefit of this training. Participants in the DSRL group also developed a more accurate relationship between confidence and competence following practice. Further research is needed to clarify the mechanisms of self-regulated learning and its role in simulation contexts.
引用
收藏
页码:648 / 656
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The challenge of self-regulated learning in mathematics teachers' professional training
    Kramarski, Bracha
    Revach, Tali
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL STUDIES IN MATHEMATICS, 2009, 72 (03) : 379 - 399
  • [42] Teachers' Professional Competences in Self-Regulated Learning: An Approach to Integrate Teachers' Competences as Self-Regulated Learners and as Agents of Self-Regulated Learning in a Holistic Manner
    Karlen, Yves
    Hertel, Silke
    Hirt, Carmen Nadja
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, 2020, 5
  • [43] Learning Curves in Directed Self-Regulated Virtual Reality Training of Mastoidectomy and the Role of Repetition and Motivation
    al Fartoussi, Hagar
    Sorensen, Mads Solvsten
    Andersen, Steven Arild Wuyts
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ADVANCED OTOLOGY, 2023, 19 (02): : 99 - +
  • [44] Computational Thinking for Self-Regulated Learning
    Pasterk, Stefan
    Benke, Gertraud
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2024 CONFERENCE INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY IN COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION, VOL 1, ITICSE 2024, 2024, : 640 - 645
  • [45] Assessment of a Self-regulated Learning Intervention
    Gonzalez-Pienda, Julio A.
    Fernandez, Estrella
    Bernardo, Ana
    Nunez, Jose C.
    Rosario, Pedro
    [J]. SPANISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 17
  • [46] Self-regulated learning using MBO
    Yanagizawa, Saori
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 43 (3-4) : 705 - 705
  • [47] Assessing academic self-regulated learning
    Wolters, CA
    Pintrich, PR
    Karabenick, SA
    [J]. WHAT DO CHILDREN NEED TO FLOURISH?: CONCEPTUALIZING AND MEASURING INDICATORS OF POSITIVE DEVELOPOMENT, 2005, : 251 - 270
  • [48] Fostering Self-Regulated Learning: An Introduction
    Brandmo, Christian
    Berger, Jean-Louis
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE EDUCATION AND PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 12 (02): : 127 - 137
  • [49] Special features of self-regulated learning
    Schmidt, Michaela
    Dignath, Charlotte
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 43 (3-4) : 546 - 546
  • [50] Measuring self-regulated learning in the workplace
    Fontana, Rosa
    Milligan, Colin
    Littlejohn, Allison
    Margaryan, Anoush
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 19 (01) : 32 - 52