Directed self-regulated learning versus instructor-regulated learning in simulation training

被引:105
|
作者
Brydges, Ryan [1 ,2 ]
Nair, Parvathy [3 ]
Ma, Irene [4 ]
Shanks, David [3 ]
Hatala, Rose [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Wilson Ctr Res Educ, Univ Hlth Network, Dept Med, Toronto, ON M5G 2C5, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Wilson Ctr, Toronto, ON M5G 2C5, Canada
[3] Univ British Columbia, Dept Med, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[4] Univ Calgary, Dept Med, Calgary, AB, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
MEDICAL-STUDENT PROCEDURES; PEDIATRIC RESIDENTS; PATIENT OPINIONS; EDUCATION; PERFORMANCE; COMPETENCE; ATTITUDES; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04268.x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Medical Education 2012: 46:648656 Objectives Simulation training offers opportunities for unsupervised, self-regulated learning, yet little evidence is available to indicate the efficacy of this approach in the learning of procedural skills. We evaluated the effectiveness of directed self-regulated learning (DSRL) and instructor-regulated learning (IRL), respectively, for teaching lumbar puncture (LP) using simulation. Methods We randomly assigned internal medicine residents in postgraduate year 1 to either DSRL (directed to progress from easy to difficult LP simulators during self-regulated learning) or IRL (in groups of four led by an instructor). All participants practised for up to 50 minutes and completed a pre-test, post-test and delayed (by 3 months) retention test on the simulator. Pairs of blinded trained experts independently rated all videotaped performances using a validated global rating scale and a modified version of a validated checklist. Participants provided measures of LP experience and self-reported confidence. We analysed the prepost (n = 42) and prepostretention performance scores (n = 23) using two separate repeated-measures analyses of variance (anovas) and computed Pearson correlation coefficients between participants confidence and performance scores. Results Inter-rater agreement was strong for both performance measures (intra-class correlation coefficient > 0.81). The groups achieved similar pre-test and post-test scores (p > 0.05) and scores in both groups improved significantly from the pre- to the post-test (p < 0.05). On retention, a significant interaction (F2,42 = 3.92, p = 0.03) suggests the DSRL group maintained its post-test performance, whereas that in the IRL group dropped significantly (p < 0.05). Correlations between self-reported confidence and post-test performance were positive and significant for the DSRL group, and negative and non-significant for the IRL group. Conclusions Both IRL and DSRL led to improved LP performance immediately after practice. Whereas the IRL groups skills declined after 3 months, the DSRL groups performance was maintained, suggesting a potential long-term benefit of this training. Participants in the DSRL group also developed a more accurate relationship between confidence and competence following practice. Further research is needed to clarify the mechanisms of self-regulated learning and its role in simulation contexts.
引用
收藏
页码:648 / 656
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An Equivalence Trial Comparing Instructor-Regulated With Directed Self-Regulated Mastery Learning of Advanced Cardiac Life Support Skills
    Devine, Luke A.
    Donkers, Jeroen
    Brydges, Ryan
    Perelman, Vsevolod
    Cavalcanti, Rodrigo B.
    Issenberg, S. Barry
    [J]. SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE, 2015, 10 (04): : 202 - 209
  • [2] A mechanistic foundation for instructor-regulated collective learning
    Brooks, DW
    Markwell, J
    [J]. BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2006, 34 (02) : 103 - 110
  • [3] Remote training in laparoscopy: a randomized trial comparing home-based self-regulated training to centralized instructor-regulated training
    Sigurd Beier Sloth
    Rune Dall Jensen
    Mikkel Seyer-Hansen
    Mette Krogh Christensen
    Gunter De Win
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2022, 36 : 1444 - 1455
  • [4] Remote training in laparoscopy: a randomized trial comparing home-based self-regulated training to centralized instructor-regulated training
    Sloth, Sigurd Beier
    Jensen, Rune Dall
    Seyer-Hansen, Mikkel
    Christensen, Mette Krogh
    De Win, Gunter
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 36 (02): : 1444 - 1455
  • [5] An Equivalence Trial Comparing Instructor-Regulated With Directed Self-Regulated Mastery Learning of Advanced Cardiac Life Support Skills: (vol 10, pg 202, 2015)
    Devine, L. A.
    Donkers, J.
    Brydges, R.
    [J]. SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE, 2015, 10 (06): : 391 - 391
  • [6] Self-regulated learning and training effectiveness
    Lourenco, Daniel
    Ferreira, Aristides I.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 23 (02) : 117 - 134
  • [7] Self-regulated learning strategies and software training
    Gravill, Jane
    Compeau, Deborah
    [J]. INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2008, 45 (05) : 288 - 296
  • [8] Teacher intervention versus self-regulated learning?
    Leiss, Dominik
    [J]. TEACHING MATHEMATICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2005, 24 (2-3): : 75 - 89
  • [9] Clearing the confusion about self-directed learning and self-regulated learning
    Gandomkar, Roghayeh
    Sandars, John
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2018, 40 (08) : 862 - 863
  • [10] Self-directed learning and self-regulated learning: two different concepts
    Cerda, Cristian
    Osses, Sonia
    [J]. REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE, 2012, 140 (11) : 1504 - 1505