Allocation of visual attention while driving with simulated augmented reality

被引:42
|
作者
Eyraud, Robin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zibetti, Elisabetta [2 ,3 ]
Baccino, Thierry [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] BERTIN ERGON Ergon & Human Factors Dept Bertin Te, F-78180 Montigny Le Bretonneux, France
[2] Univ Paris 08, EPHE Paris, Lab CHART LUTIN Cognit Humaine & Artificielle EA, Cite Sci & Ind, Paris, France
[3] Univ Paris 08, F-93526 St Denis 02, France
关键词
Allocation of visual attention; Driving; Augmented reality; DRIVER; MODELS; DISPLAYS; VISION; CUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.trf.2015.04.011
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Augmented reality (AR) technologies aim to optimize the visual attention of the driver by increasing the salience of high value elements. In such systems, 'value' is typically seen as linked to the general activity of driving, but not manoeuvres. However, several studies have shown that during activity, eye movements are specific to the immediate goal. In our experiment, 48 participants watched videos of automobile driving situations, during which they had to make decisions. In these videos, some situational cues were graphically highlighted. Depending on the experimental group, highlighted cues related to either the general driving task (e.g. road signs, pedestrians) or to a specific manoeuvre (e.g. look for overtaking cars before changing the lane). The results show that AR impacts the allocation of visual attention more strongly during the decision-making phase. In all AR conditions, the ability to extract information is less efficient. In particular, highlighting (by AR) general cues does not affect the detection of cues related to a manoeuvre, but it does change the allocation of visual attention: fixations are more numerous and less task-specific. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 55
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Selective Attention and Error Proneness while Driving: Research Using a Conjunctive Visual Search Task
    Andrea Montes, Silvana
    Maria Introzzi, Isabel
    Daniel Ledesma, Ruben
    Susana Lopez, Soledad
    AVANCES EN PSICOLOGIA LATINOAMERICANA, 2016, 34 (02): : 195 - 203
  • [32] Distribution and allocation of visual attention
    Yeh, S-L
    PERCEPTION, 1999, 28 : 141 - 141
  • [33] Distributed Visual Processing for Augmented Reality
    Yii, Winston
    Li, Wai Ho
    Drummond, Tom
    2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MIXED AND AUGMENTED REALITY (ISMAR) - SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2012, : 41 - 48
  • [34] Resource Allocation for the Provision of Augmented Reality Service
    Makolkina, Maria
    Paramonov, Alexander
    Koucheryavy, Andrey
    INTERNET OF THINGS, SMART SPACES, AND NEXT GENERATION NETWORKS AND SYSTEMS, NEW2AN 2018, 2018, 11118 : 441 - 455
  • [35] Event-related Potentials-based Evaluation of Attention Allocation while Watching Virtual Reality
    Ogawa R.
    Kageyama K.
    Nakatani Y.
    Ono Y.
    Murakami S.
    Advanced Biomedical Engineering, 2022, 11 : 1 - 9
  • [36] Event-related Potentials-based Evaluation of Attention Allocation while Watching Virtual Reality
    Ogawa, Ryo
    Kageyama, Kaito
    Nakatani, Yasushi
    Ono, Yumie
    Murakami, Shingo
    ADVANCED BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 11 : 1 - 9
  • [37] Display signaling in augmented reality: Effects of cue reliability and image realism on attention allocation and trust calibration
    Yeh, M
    Wickens, CD
    HUMAN FACTORS, 2001, 43 (03) : 355 - 365
  • [38] How does navigating with Augmented Reality information affect drivers' glance behaviour in terms of attention allocation?
    Bauerfeind, Kassandra
    Drueke, Julia
    Bendewald, Lennart
    Baumann, Martin
    FRONTIERS IN VIRTUAL REALITY, 2022, 3
  • [39] Spatial orienting of attention using augmented reality
    Jerome, CJ
    Witmer, BG
    Mouloua, M
    Foundations of Augmented Cognition, Vol 11, 2005, : 718 - 726
  • [40] Directing driver attention with augmented reality cues
    Rusch, Michelle L.
    Schall, Mark C., Jr.
    Gavin, Patrick
    Lee, John D.
    Dawson, Jeffrey D.
    Vecera, Shaun
    Rizzo, Matthew
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2013, 16 : 127 - 137