Efficacy Outcome Measures for Pediatric Procedural Sedation Clinical Trials: An ACTTION Systematic Review

被引:14
|
作者
Williams, Mark R. [1 ]
Nayshtut, Michael [2 ]
Hoefnagel, Amie [3 ]
McKeown, Andrew [1 ]
Carlson, Douglas W. [4 ]
Cravero, Joseph [5 ]
Lightdale, Jenifer [6 ]
Mason, Keira P. [5 ]
Wilson, Stephen [7 ]
Turk, Dennis C. [8 ]
Dworkin, Robert H. [1 ,9 ,10 ]
Ward, Denham S. [1 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Sch Med & Dent, Dept Anesthesiol, 601 Elmwood Ave,Box 604, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
[2] Robert Wood Johnson St Barnabas Hlth Syst, Dept Anesthesiol, Livingston, NJ USA
[3] Univ Florida, Dept Anesthesiol, Jacksonville, FL USA
[4] Washington Univ, St Louis Childrens Hosp, Div Pediat Hosp Med, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[5] Boston Childrens Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol Perioperat & Pain Med, Boston, MA USA
[6] Univ Massachusetts, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, UMass Mem Childrens Med Ctr, Worcester, MA USA
[7] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, Div Pediat Dent, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
[8] Univ Washington, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[9] Univ Rochester, Sch Med & Dent, Dept Neurol, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
[10] Univ Rochester, Sch Med & Dent, Dept Psychiat, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
[11] Tufts Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Boston, MA USA
来源
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA | 2018年 / 126卷 / 03期
关键词
OF-MICHIGAN SEDATION; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; PRESCHOOL-CHILDREN; INTRANASAL MIDAZOLAM; PATIENT SATISFACTION; OBJECTIVE MEASURES; PAIN MEASUREMENT; ANESTHESIA CARE; ADVERSE EVENTS; RECOVERY SCALE;
D O I
10.1213/ANE.0000000000002456
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objective evaluations comparing different techniques and approaches to pediatric procedural sedation studies have been limited by a lack of consistency among the outcome measures used in assessment. This study reviewed those existing measures, which have undergone psychometric analysis in a pediatric procedural sedation setting, to determine to what extent and in what circumstances their use is justified across the spectrum of procedures, age groups, and techniques. The results of our study suggest that a wide range of measures has been used to assess the efficacy and effectiveness of pediatric procedural sedation. Most lack the evidence of validity and reliability that is necessary to facilitate rigorous clinical trial design, as well as the evaluation of new drugs and devices. A set of core pediatric sedation outcome domains and outcome measures can be developed on the basis of our findings. We believe that consensus among all stakeholders regarding appropriate domains and measures to evaluate pediatric procedural sedation is possible and that widespread implementation of such recommendations should be pursued.
引用
收藏
页码:956 / 967
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] Efficacy and Safety of Quetiapine for Pediatric Bipolar Depression: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials
    Srinivas, Sushma
    Parvataneni, Tarun
    Makani, Ramkrishna
    Patel, Rikinkumar S.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 12 (06)
  • [43] Efficacy and safety of remimazolam in procedural sedation and analgesia A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis
    Wang, Feng
    Zhou, Qian
    Shen, Minhuan
    Quan, Jing
    Chen, Jiejuan
    Shi, Jing
    Zou, Xiaohua
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (27) : E20765
  • [44] Reporting of primary analyses and multiplicity adjustment in recent analgesic clinical trials: ACTTION systematic review and recommendations
    Gewandter, Jennifer S.
    Smith, Shannon M.
    McKeown, Andrew
    Burke, Laurie B.
    Hertz, Sharon H.
    Hunsinger, Matthew
    Katz, Nathaniel P.
    Lin, Allison H.
    McDermott, Michael P.
    Rappaport, Bob A.
    Williams, Mark R.
    Turk, Dennis C.
    Dworkin, Robert H.
    PAIN, 2014, 155 (03) : 461 - 466
  • [45] Heterogeneity of outcome measures in depression trials and the relevance of the content of outcome measures to patients: a systematic review
    Veal, Christopher
    Tomlinson, Anneka
    Cipriani, Andrea
    Bulteau, Samuel
    Henry, Chantal
    Muh, Chloe
    Touboul, Suzanne
    De Waal, Nikki
    Levy-Soussan, Hana
    Furukawa, Toshi A.
    Fried, Eiko, I
    Tran, Viet-Thi
    Chevance, Astrid
    LANCET PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 11 (04): : 285 - 294
  • [46] Outcome measures for use in trials of paediatric otorrhoea: A systematic review
    Heward, Elliot
    Dempsey, James
    Molloy, John
    Isba, Rachel
    Lunn, Judith
    Ashcroft, Darren M.
    Hay, Alastair D.
    Nichani, Jaya R.
    Bruce, Iain A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2024, 176
  • [47] Methods used to manage missing data in recent analgesic clinical trials: ACTTION systematic review and recommendations
    Gewandter, J.
    McDermott, M.
    McKeown, A.
    Smith, S.
    Farrar, J.
    Hertz, S.
    Hinsinger, M.
    Lin, A.
    Rappaport, B.
    Williams, M.
    Turk, D.
    Dworkin, R.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2014, 15 (04): : S41 - S41
  • [48] Reporting of data monitoring boards in publications of randomized clinical trials is often deficient: ACTTION systematic review
    Gewandter, Jennifer S.
    Kitt, Rachel A.
    Hunsinger, Matthew R.
    Poku, Joseph
    Lozano, Jacqueline
    Chaudari, Jenna
    Evans, Scott
    Gross, Robert A.
    McDermott, Michael P.
    Rowbotham, Michael C.
    Turk, Dennis C.
    Dworkin, Robert H.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 83 : 101 - 107
  • [49] The use of digital outcome measures in clinical trials in rare neurological diseases: a systematic literature review
    Poleur, Margaux
    Markati, Theodora
    Servais, Laurent
    ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [50] Diagnostic criteria and outcome measures in randomized clinical trials on carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review
    Sousa, Rafael Luz
    de Moraes, Vinicius Ynoe
    Zobiole, Alexandre Figueiredo
    Nakachima, Luis Renato
    Belloti, Joao Carlos
    SAO PAULO MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 141 (06):