Clinical efficacy and safety of insulin aspart compared with regular human insulin in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:11
|
作者
Wojciechowski, Piotr [1 ]
Niemczyk-Szechowska, Patrycja [1 ]
Olewinska, Elzbieta [1 ]
Jaros, Patrycja [1 ]
Mierzejewska, Barbara [2 ]
Skarzynska-Duk, Joanna [2 ]
Malecki, Maciej T. [3 ,4 ]
Rys, Przemyslaw [1 ]
机构
[1] HTA Consulting, Krakow, Poland
[2] Novo Nordisk Pharma, Warsaw, Poland
[3] Jagiellonian Univ, Dept Metab Dis, Coll Med, Krakow, Poland
[4] Univ Hosp, Krakow, Poland
来源
POLSKIE ARCHIWUM MEDYCYNY WEWNETRZNEJ-POLISH ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE | 2015年 / 125卷 / 03期
关键词
insulin aspart; insulin therapy; rapid-acting insulin analog; type 1 diabetes mellitus; type 2 diabetes mellitus; BASAL-BOLUS REGIMEN; METABOLIC-CONTROL; MEALTIME INSULIN; GLUCOSE CONTROL; NPH INSULIN; HYPOGLYCEMIA; MANAGEMENT; MELLITUS; ANALOGS; QUALITY;
D O I
10.20452/pamw.2705
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
INTRODUCTION Prandial insulin is a key component in insulin treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and in many patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The evidence-based data supporting the choice of an insulin preparation are still limited. OBJECTIVES We performed a systematic review to summarize and update the evidence on relative efficacy and safety of insulin aspart (IAsp) and regular human insulin (RHI) in both types of diabetes. METHODS Randomized controlled trials comparing IAsp with RHI in patients with either T1DM or T2DM and conducted until May 2013 were retrieved from a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. RESULTS Of 16 relevant trials, 11 involved patients with T1DM and 5-with T2DM. In the T1DM population, IAsp, when compared with RHI, provided a greater reduction in hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) levels (weighted mean difference [WMD], -0.11%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.16 to -0.05; WMD, -1.2 mmol/mol; 95% CI, -1.7 to -0.5), and improved postprandial glucose levels following breakfast (WMD, -1.40 mmol/l; 95% CI, -1.72 to -1.07), lunch (WMD, -1.01 mmol/l; 95% CI, -1.61 to -0.41), and dinner (WMD, -0.89 mmol/l; 95% CI, -1.19 to -0.59). The risk of nocturnal hypoglycemia was lower in T1DM patients receiving IAsp (relative risk, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.64-0.91), while no difference was observed for severe hypoglycemia. In T2DM patients, IAsp led to a greater reduction in HbA(1c) levels (WMD, -0.22%; 95% CI, -0.39 to -0.05; -2.4 mmol/mol, -4.3 to -0.5) and postprandial blood glucose. The risk of overall hypoglycemia and severe adverse effects was comparable between the groups. CONCLUSIONS IAsp provides better glycemic control when compared with RHI in patients with T1DM and T2DM. Fewer T1DM patients treated with IAsp experienced nocturnal hypoglycemia, while both interventions showed a comparable risk of severe hypoglycemic events in both types of diabetes.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 151
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The efficacy of insulin glargine compared to other injectable therapies - A meta-analysis of clinical outcomes in insulin naive Type 2 diabetes patients
    Pascoe, K.
    McDonald-Everett, C. M.
    FitzGerald, P.
    Yurgin, N. R.
    Secnik, K.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2006, 9 (06) : A234 - A234
  • [32] Efficacy of biphasic insulin aspart in patients with type 2 diabetes
    Halimi, S
    Raskin, P
    Liebl, A
    Kawamori, R
    Fulcher, G
    Yan, G
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2005, 27 : S57 - S74
  • [33] Effectiveness of Faster Aspart versus Insulin Aspart in Children with Type 1 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis
    Wei, Jie
    Wang, Yueer
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 53 (01) : 23 - 34
  • [34] The Effect of Regular Exercise on Insulin Sensitivity in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Way, Kimberley L.
    Hackett, Daniel A.
    Baker, Michael K.
    Johnson, Nathan A.
    DIABETES & METABOLISM JOURNAL, 2016, 40 (04) : 253 - 271
  • [35] Efficacy and safety of fast-acting insulin aspart compared with insulin aspart, both with insulin degludec with or without metformin, in adults with type 2 diabetes
    Lane, W.
    Bozkurt, K.
    Favaro, E.
    Jang, H. C.
    Kjaersgaard, M. I. S.
    Oviedo, A.
    Rose, L.
    Senior, P.
    Sesti, G.
    Soto Gonzalez, A.
    Franek, E.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2019, 62 : S10 - S11
  • [36] A direct efficacy and safety comparison of insulin aspart, human soluble insulin, and human premix insulin (70/30) in patients with type 2 diabetes
    Bretzel, RG
    Medding, J
    Arnolds, S
    Linn, T
    DIABETES CARE, 2004, 27 (05) : 1023 - 1027
  • [37] Efficacy and Safety of Ertugliflozin Compared to Placebo in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kamrul-Hasan, A. B. M.
    Alam, Muhammad Shah
    Talukder, Samir Kumar
    Hannan, Mohammad Abdul
    Dutta, Deep
    Nagendra, Lakshmi
    Selim, Shahjada
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES RESEARCH, 2024, 2024
  • [38] Efficacy and Safety of Dulaglutide Compared to Liraglutide: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
    Taheri, Saeed
    Saffaei, Ali
    Amani, Bahman
    Arash, Akbarzadeh
    Peiravian, Farzad
    Yousefi, Nazila
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 18 (04): : 2180 - 2190
  • [39] Safety and efficacy of long term exposure to biphasic insulin aspart compared with biphasic human insulin in people with Type 2 diabetes.
    Boehm, B
    Home, P
    Råstam, J
    Keiding, J
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2003, 46 : A269 - A269
  • [40] Effectiveness and safety of insulin glargine versus detemir analysis in patients with type 1 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Silva, Thales B. C.
    Almeida, Paulo H. R. F.
    Araujo, Vania E.
    Acurcio, Francisco de Assis
    Guerra Junior, Augusto A.
    Godman, Brian
    Alvares, Juliana
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM, 2018, 9 (08) : 241 - 254