A Pilot Study: Evaluating the Effects of Defusion on Choice Making Under Negative and Positive Reinforcement Contingencies

被引:1
|
作者
Chastain, Amanda N. [1 ]
Tarbox, Jonathan [1 ]
Meshes, Elizabeth [2 ]
Wang, Yiyi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
[2] Chicago Sch Profess Psychol, Chicago, IL USA
来源
PSYCHOLOGICAL RECORD | 2022年 / 72卷 / 03期
关键词
Delay discounting; Acceptance and commitment therapy; Defusion; Complex verbal behavior; Rule-governed behavior; Psychological flexibility; COMMITMENT THERAPY; COGNITIVE DEFUSION; VERBAL-BEHAVIOR; ACCEPTANCE; EXERCISE; CHILDREN; PARENTS; REAL;
D O I
10.1007/s40732-022-00511-3
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The goal of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) is to help people engage in experiential avoidance less and committed action toward values more. One possible behavior analytic interpretation is that it helps people choose short-term negative reinforcement less and choose longer-term positive reinforcement more. To our knowledge, no laboratory research to date has evaluated the effect of ACT interventions on the behavior of choosing between immediate negative reinforcement or delayed positive reinforcement. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the effects of defusion exercises on participants' choice making on a delay discounting computer task that presented choices between immediate avoidance of an aversive sound or presentation of the aversive sound and delayed positive reinforcement in the form of money. A multiple baseline design across participants was used to measure changes in discounting before and after a brief defusion session. All three participants discounted less steeply (i.e., selected to listen to the sound in order to earn money more often) following defusion training when compared to baseline.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 463
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE SUCCESSIVE CONTRAST EFFECTS FOLLOWING MULTIPLE SHIFTS IN REWARD MAGNITUDE UNDER HIGH DRIVE AND IMMEDIATE REINFORCEMENT
    MAXWELL, FR
    CALEF, RS
    MURRAY, DW
    SHEPARD, JC
    NORVILLE, RA
    [J]. ANIMAL LEARNING & BEHAVIOR, 1976, 4 (04): : 480 - 484
  • [42] Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-choice testing
    Butler, Andrew C.
    Roediger, Henry L., III
    [J]. MEMORY & COGNITION, 2008, 36 (03) : 604 - 616
  • [43] Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-choice testing
    Andrew C. Butler
    Henry L. Roediger
    [J]. Memory & Cognition, 2008, 36 : 604 - 616
  • [44] Evaluation of Choice Allocation Between Positive and Negative Reinforcement During Functional Communication Training with Young Children
    Harding, Jay W.
    Wacker, David P.
    Berg, Wendy K.
    Winborn-Kemmerer, Lisa
    Lee, John F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL AND PHYSICAL DISABILITIES, 2009, 21 (06) : 443 - 456
  • [45] Evaluation of Choice Allocation Between Positive and Negative Reinforcement During Functional Communication Training with Young Children
    Jay W. Harding
    David P. Wacker
    Wendy K. Berg
    Lisa Winborn-Kemmerer
    John F. Lee
    [J]. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 2009, 21 : 443 - 456
  • [46] EFFECTS OF POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE FORCE-CONTINGENT REINFORCEMENT ON FRUSTRATION EFFECT IN HUMANS
    DITKOFF, G
    LEY, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1974, 102 (05): : 818 - 823
  • [47] Varied effects of conventional antiepileptics on responding maintained by negative versus positive reinforcement
    Roberts, Celeste
    Harvey, Mark T.
    May, Michael E.
    Valdovinos, Maria G.
    Patterson, Tina G.
    Couppis, Maria H.
    Kennedy, Craig H.
    [J]. PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 2008, 93 (03) : 612 - 621
  • [49] POSITIVE VS NEGATIVE REINFORCEMENT - DIRECT COMPARISON OF EFFECTS ON A COMPLEX HUMAN RESPONSE
    POWELL, J
    HAKE, DF
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL RECORD, 1971, 21 (02): : 191 - &
  • [50] A preliminary procedure for predicting the positive and negative effects of reinforcement-based procedures
    Piazza, CC
    Fisher, WW
    Hanley, GP
    Hilker, K
    Derby, KM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1996, 29 (02) : 137 - 152