Energy performance of buildings: Astatisticalapproach to marry calculated demand and measured consumption

被引:10
|
作者
Hoerner, Michael [1 ]
Lichtmess, Markus [2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Wohnen & Umwelt IWU, Rheinstr 65, D-64295 Darmstadt, Germany
[2] Goblet Lavandier & Associes Ingenieurs Conseils S, 17 Rue JP Sauvage, L-2514 Luxembourg, Luxembourg
关键词
Energy performance of buildings; Multiple linear regression; Errors-in-variables model; Calculated energy demand; Measured energy consumption; Calibration;
D O I
10.1007/s12053-018-9664-2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In public debate, Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs) of buildings have been criticised for not reflecting the energy demand realistically. And indeed, measurement, as in energy bills, usually differs from the calculation, in particular, when simplified energy performance calculation models and standard specifications are applied, as in EPCs. Thus, energy-saving potentials of refurbishment recommendations and their cost-effectiveness tend to be over-estimated. Of course, this is not desirable. These effects were analysed in two sets of data, the Energy Performance Certificate Register for residential buildings in Luxemburg, run by the Luxemburg Ministry of the Economy (Lichtme beta, 2012) and a database gathered in the research project Teilenergiekennwerte von Nichtwohngebauden (TEK) (Horner et al., 2014a) funded by the German Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs and Energy. Multiple linear regression and error calculus were applied to study the gap between measurement and various calculation models in detail. A statistical procedure is proposed to estimate expectation value and variance of the future energy consumption of buildings in case of refurbishment, as a supplement to standard calculations in EPCs for example. Prerequisite is that for a sufficient number of buildings, data on both, measured energy consumption and calculated demand, are available.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 155
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Performance Evaluation of Techniques for Identifying Abnormal Energy Consumption in Buildings
    Gaur, Megha
    Makonin, Stephen
    Bajic, Ivan, V
    Majumdar, Angshul
    IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 : 62721 - 62733
  • [22] The Prebound Effect: Discrepancies Between Measured and Calculated Consumption
    Green Energy and Technology, 2013, 148 : 67 - 84
  • [23] Comparison between measured and calculated energy performance for dwellings in a summer dominant environment
    Fokaides, Paris A.
    Maxoulis, Christos N.
    Panayiotou, Gregoris P.
    Neophytou, Marina K-A
    Kalogirou, Soteris A.
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2011, 43 (11) : 3099 - 3105
  • [24] SOUND INSULATION IN BUILDINGS OF CONCRETE - COMPARISONS OF CALCULATED AND MEASURED VALUES
    LJUNGGREN, S
    OTTOSSON, B
    ACTA ACUSTICA, 1995, 3 (01): : 59 - 65
  • [26] Effect of window-to-wall ratio on measured energy consumption in US office buildings
    Troup, Luke
    Phillips, Robert
    Eckelman, Matthew J.
    Fannon, David
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2019, 203
  • [27] The EU CONCERTO project Class 1-Demonstrating cost-effective low-energy buildings - Recent results with special focus on comparison of calculated and measured energy performance of Danish buildings
    Morck, Ove
    Thomsen, Kirsten Engelund
    Rose, Jorgen
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2012, 97 : 319 - 326
  • [28] Measured performance of energy efficiency measures for zero-energy retrofitting in residential buildings
    Wang, Zhichao
    Shen, Hui
    Deng, Gaofeng
    Liu, Xiaoyu
    Wang, Dong
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2024, 91
  • [29] From buildings to cities: How household demographics shape demand response and energy consumption
    Osman, Mohamed
    Saad, Mostafa M.
    Ouf, Mohamed
    Eicker, Ursula
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2024, 356
  • [30] Impacts of climate change on energy consumption and peak demand in buildings: A detailed regional approach
    Dirks, James A.
    Gorrissen, Willy J.
    Hathaway, John H.
    Skorski, Daniel C.
    Scott, Michael J.
    Pulsipher, Trenton C.
    Huang, Maoyi
    Liu, Ying
    Rice, Jennie S.
    ENERGY, 2015, 79 : 20 - 32