共 50 条
The impact of project diabetes with dignity intervention on knowledge and quality of life among adults with diabetes in a rural Indian setting
被引:1
|作者:
Nazar, Gaurang P.
[1
,2
]
Arora, Monika
[1
,2
]
Gupta, Vinay Kumar
[1
]
Rawal, Tina
[1
,2
]
Chugh, Aastha
[2
]
Shrivastava, Surbhi
[2
]
Dhore, Prasanna
[3
]
Bhatt, Anjali
[3
]
Deshpande, Shailesh R.
[3
]
Unnikrishnan, A. G.
[3
]
机构:
[1] Publ Hlth Fdn India, Hlth Promot Div, Gurugram, Haryana, India
[2] HRIDAY, New Delhi, India
[3] Chellaram Diabet Inst, Pune, Maharashtra, India
关键词:
Diabetes;
India;
intervention;
knowledge;
quality of life;
COMMUNITY-HEALTH WORKERS;
COMPLICATIONS;
CARE;
PREVENTION;
MANAGEMENT;
TRENDS;
D O I:
10.4103/jncd.jncd_31_21
中图分类号:
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号:
1004 ;
120402 ;
摘要:
Objective: Inadequate knowledge about diabetes leads to its under-diagnosis and sub-optimal control. We studied the impact of project diabetes with dignity (DWD) intervention on knowledge and quality of life (QoL) among adults with diabetes in a rural Indian setting. Methods: DWD was a community-based, quasi-experimental trial conducted with 416 participants (30-70 years) with diabetes across two Primary Health Centers (one intervention; one control) in Western India, over a year. The intervention involved monthly home visits, patient/caregiver, and community-based awareness-raising activities by trained accredited social health activists (ASHAs) workers. Differences in changes in knowledge about: Diabetes, symptoms, management, and complications, and QoL between participants in the intervention versus control areas, from baseline to end-line, were assessed using a questionnaire and analyzed via mixed-effects regression models.<br>Results: About 52% of patients belonged to the intervention group. There was a significant increase in knowledge about diagnosis/management among participants in intervention group (31.48% [95% confidence interval (CI) 24.52-38.43] to 59.55% [52.52-66.58]) versus a decline in the control group (40.73% [33.40-48.07] to 27.95% [19.40-34.50]) (P < 0.001). Similar improvements in intervention group were observed for knowledge about symptoms/complications of diabetes. For QoL, percentage of patients having some self-care problems showed a higher decline in intervention group (29.46% to 6.98%) versus control group (4.85% to 3.55%) (P = 0.005). Reduction in anxiety/depression was significant in the intervention versus control group (P < 0.001).<br>Conclusion: DWD was effective in improving QoL and diabetes knowledge which are key to prevent disease progression/complications in the intervention compared to the control group. Capacity-building of community health workers such as ASHAs, for the prevention and management of diabetes in rural settings, is recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 136
页数:8
相关论文