Optimising sensor pitch for magnetic flux leakage imaging systems

被引:1
|
作者
Murshudov, R. [1 ]
Watson, J. M. [1 ]
Liang, C. W. [1 ]
Sexton, J. [1 ]
Missous, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1784/insi.2021.63.7.416
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
Sensor arrays can significantly increase the speed at which inspections and subsequent imaging of flaws is performed([1]). This work focuses on developing a software approach for optimising the spacing between quantum well Hall-effect (QWHE) magnetic sensors used for magnetic flux leakage (MFL) imaging, where this approach could be adapted for any non-destructive evaluation (NDE) technique in which imaging is obtained. A ground mild steel weld sample containing two surface-breaking flaws prepared by Sonaspection was scanned using an XYZ MFL imaging system developed at the University of Manchester([2,3,13,14]). The scan was taken with an autonomously controlled lift-off height of 0.75 mm, with an x-y measurement step of 100 mu m and an applied magnetic field of 30 mT root mean square (RMS) at a frequency of 400 Hz. This data (ie magnetic image) was then processed to simulate different measurement step sizes, to determine any relationship between step size and flaw detectability (flaw signal to weld background response). This work effectively simulates different sensor pitches (separation between sensors) of integrated QWHE sensor arrays from 100 mu m to 5 mm, with the goal of determining both the minimum number of sensors required in the array and the optimal spacing to maximise scan speeds and help determine optimum inspection parameters to develop the technology of low-power MFL imaging. This optimisation process could be applied to any NDE imaging system (electromagnetic or other) currently used, with results dependent on the inspection parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:416 / 421
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Sensor Liftoff Modification Method of Magnetic Flux Leakage Signal for Defect Profile Estimation
    Feng, Jian
    Lu, Senxiang
    Liu, Jinhai
    Li, Fangming
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2017, 53 (07)
  • [22] A Giant-Magnetoresistance Sensor for Magnetic-Flux-Leakage Nondestructive Testing of a Pipeline
    L. Chen
    P.-W. Que
    T. Jin
    Russian Journal of Nondestructive Testing, 2005, 41 : 462 - 465
  • [23] Flexible GMR Sensor Array for Magnetic Flux Leakage Testing of Steel Track Ropes
    Singh, W. Sharatchandra
    Rao, B. P. C.
    Thirunavukkarasu, S.
    Jayakumar, T.
    JOURNAL OF SENSORS, 2012, 2012
  • [24] Highly Sensitive Planar Hall Magnetoresistive Sensor for Magnetic Flux Leakage Pipeline Inspection
    Hong Quang Pham
    Bang Viet Tran
    Duy Tuan Doan
    Van Sy Le
    Quang Ngan Pham
    Kim, Kunwoo
    Kim, CheolGi
    Terki, Ferial
    Quang Hung Tran
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2018, 54 (06)
  • [25] Improvement of the sensor system in magnetic flux leakage-type nondestructive testing (NDT)
    Park, GS
    Park, ES
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2002, 38 (02) : 1277 - 1280
  • [26] A giant-magnetoresistance sensor for magnetic-flux-leakage nondestructive testing of a pipeline
    Chen, L
    Que, PW
    Jin, T
    RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING, 2005, 41 (07) : 462 - 465
  • [27] MAGNETIC FLUX LEAKAGE: A BENCHMARK PROBLEM
    Etcheverry, J. I.
    Sanchez, G. A.
    Bonadeo, N.
    REVIEW OF PROGRESS IN QUANTITATIVE NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, VOLS 30A AND 30B, 2011, 1335 : 1785 - 1791
  • [28] Dipole Modeling of Magnetic Flux Leakage
    Dutta, Sushant M.
    Ghorbel, Fathi H.
    Stanley, Roderic K.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2009, 45 (04) : 1959 - 1965
  • [29] MAGNETIC FLUX SENSOR
    ZINKE, OH
    JACOVELLI, PB
    REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 1965, 36 (07): : 916 - +
  • [30] Flux qubit as a sensor of magnetic flux
    Il'ichev, E.
    Greenberg, Ya. S.
    EPL, 2007, 77 (05)