Survey on Open Science Practices in Functional Neuroimaging

被引:18
|
作者
Paret, Christian [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
Unverhau, Nike [1 ]
Feingold, Franklin [3 ]
Poldrack, Russell A. [3 ]
Stirner, Madita [1 ]
Schmahl, Christian [1 ]
Sicorello, Maurizio [1 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Cent Inst Mental Hlth Mannheim, Med Fac Mannheim, Dept Psychosomat Med & Psychotherapy, Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Sagol Brain Inst, Wohl Inst Adv Imaging, Tel Aviv Sourasky Med Ctr, Tel Aviv, Israel
[3] Stanford Univ, Dept Psychol, Stanford, CA USA
[4] Cent Inst Mental Hlth, J5, D-68159 Mannheim, Germany
[5] Tel Aviv Univ, Sch Psychol Sci, Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
Data sharing; fMRI; Metascience; Neuroimaging; Open science; Preregistration; Research methods; Replication; Reproducibility; Robustness; Validity; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119306
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Replicability and reproducibility of scientific findings is paramount for sustainable progress in neuroscience. Preregistration of the hypotheses and methods of an empirical study before analysis, the sharing of primary research data, and compliance with data standards such as the Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS), are considered effective practices to secure progress and to substantiate quality of research. We investigated the current level of adoption of open science practices in neuroimaging and the difficulties that prevent researchers from using them. Email invitations to participate in the survey were sent to addresses received through a PubMed search of human functional magnetic resonance imaging studies that were published between 2010 and 2020. 283 persons completed the questionnaire. Although half of the participants were experienced with preregistration, the willingness to preregister studies in the future was modest. The majority of participants had experience with the sharing of primary neuroimaging data. Most of the participants were interested in implementing a standardized data structure such as BIDS in their labs. Based on demographic variables, we compared participants on seven subscales, which had been generated through factor analysis. Exploratory analyses found that experienced researchers at lower career level had higher fear of being transparent and researchers with residence in the EU had a higher need for data governance. Additionally, researchers at medical faculties as compared to other university faculties reported a more unsupportive supervisor with regards to open science practices and a higher need for data governance. The results suggest growing adoption of open science practices but also highlight a number of important impediments.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Towards wide-scale adoption of open science practices: The role of open science communities
    Armeni, Kristijan
    Brinkman, Loek
    Carlsson, Rickard
    Eerland, Anita
    Fijten, Rianne
    Fondberg, Robin
    Heininga, Vera E.
    Heunis, Stephan
    Koh, Wei Qi
    Masselink, Maurits
    Moran, Niall
    Baoill, Andrew O.
    Sarafoglou, Alexandra
    Schettino, Antonio
    Schwamm, Hardy
    Sjoerds, Zsuzsika
    Teperek, Marta
    van den Akker, Olmo R.
    van't Veer, Anna
    Zurita-Milla, Raul
    SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2021, 48 (05) : 605 - 611
  • [32] Normalizing Open Science Practice: Understandings, Evaluations, and Implementations of Open Science Practices in the Field of Communication
    Perreault, Gregory
    Dienlin, Tobias
    JOURNALISM & MASS COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY, 2025, 102 (01) : 274 - 299
  • [33] Importance of open science and science communication practices from the perspective of stakeholders
    Ribeiro, Nivaldo Calixto
    Oliveira, Dalgiza Andrade
    Dias, Celia da Consolacao
    Dias Miranda, Angelica Conceicao
    RDBCI-REVISTA DIGITAL DE BIBLIOTECONOMIA E CIENCIA DA INFORMACAO, 2022, 20
  • [34] From Open Science to Open Source (and beyond) A Historical Perspective on Open Practices without and with IT
    Wolff, Bastian
    Schlagwein, Daniel
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 17TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON OPEN COLLABORATION (OPENSYM), 2021,
  • [35] A survey of open source data science tools
    Barlas, Panagiotis
    Lanning, Ivor
    Heavey, Cathal
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT COMPUTING AND CYBERNETICS, 2015, 8 (03) : 232 - 261
  • [36] Information Support for Open Science: Practices of Libraries on the Net
    Redkina, N. S.
    SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION PROCESSING, 2023, 50 (02) : 136 - 144
  • [37] Information Support for Open Science: Practices of Libraries on the Net
    N. S. Redkina
    Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 2023, 50 : 136 - 144
  • [38] Answers to 18 Questions About Open Science Practices
    Banks, George C.
    Field, James G.
    Oswald, Frederick L.
    O'Boyle, Ernest H.
    Landis, Ronald S.
    Rupp, Deborah E.
    Rogelberg, Steven G.
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 34 (03) : 257 - 270
  • [39] Open science practices in criminology and criminal justice journals
    Greenspan, Rachel Leigh
    Baggett, Logan
    Boutwell, Brian B.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CRIMINOLOGY, 2024,
  • [40] Questionable Research Practices and Open Science in Quantitative Criminology
    Chin, Jason M.
    Pickett, Justin T.
    Vazire, Simine
    Holcombe, Alex O.
    JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE CRIMINOLOGY, 2023, 39 (01) : 21 - 51