An Integrated Decision-Making Model for Condition Assessment of Power Transformers Using Fuzzy Approach and Evidential Reasoning

被引:119
|
作者
Liao, Ruijin [1 ]
Zheng, Hanbo [1 ]
Grzybowski, Stanislaw [2 ]
Yang, Lijun [1 ]
Zhang, Yiyi [1 ]
Liao, Yuxiang [3 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Univ, State Key Lab Power Transmiss Equipment & Syst Se, Chongqing 400044, Peoples R China
[2] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, High Voltage Lab, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
[3] Chongqing Elect Power Corp, Chongqing 401147, Peoples R China
关键词
Condition assessments; evidential reasoning; fuzzy approach; power transformers; FAULT-DIAGNOSIS; EXPERT-SYSTEM; LIFE;
D O I
10.1109/TPWRD.2010.2096482
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
This paper presents an integrated model based upon the fuzzy approach and evidential reasoning decision-making approach to condition assessment of power transformers. An assessing index system, including the DGA data, electrical testing, and oil testing, is established to facilitate the assessing model. The model is composed of two levels, that is, the fuzzy model and evidential reasoning model. The fuzzy model is proposed for generating the original basic probability assignments for the second-level model. Afterwards, an evidential reasoning decision-making model is utilized to combine all of the evidence and give an overall evaluation conclusion. Based upon this integrated model, a decision-making procedure is put forward to serve as an effective tool for transformer condition assessments. The results show that the assessing model is capable of offering an overall evaluation of the observed transformer condition.
引用
收藏
页码:1111 / 1118
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Integrated fuzzy decision-making model with incomplete information
    Chen, Shou-Yu
    Wang, Jian-Ming
    Fu, Guang-Tao
    [J]. Kongzhi yu Juece/Control and Decision, 2002, 17 (06): : 847 - 851
  • [22] Robust Model Selection Decision-making using a Fuzzy Supervisory Approach
    Hu, Xiao
    Bonissone, Piero
    Subbu, Raj
    [J]. MCDM: 2009 IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE IN MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING, 2009, : 126 - 132
  • [23] A Synthetic Condition Assessment Model for Power Transformers Using the Fuzzy Evidence Fusion Method
    Tian, Fenglan
    Jing, Zhongzhao
    Zhao, Huan
    Zhang, Enze
    Liu, Jiefeng
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (05)
  • [24] Human decision making model by Boolean approach and fuzzy reasoning
    Kono, Y
    Yamashita, T
    [J]. NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN PSYCHOMETRICS, 2003, : 593 - 600
  • [25] A group decision-making approach based on evidential reasoning for multiple criteria sorting problem with uncertainty
    Liu, Jiapeng
    Liao, Xiuwu
    Yang, Jian-bo
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2015, 246 (03) : 858 - 873
  • [26] Defect-Based Condition Assessment of Concrete Bridges Fuzzy Hierarchical Evidential Reasoning Approach
    Moufti, Sami A.
    Zayed, Tarek
    Abu Dabous, Saleh
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2014, (2431) : 88 - 96
  • [27] Risk assessment in IT outsourcing using fuzzy decision-making approach: An Indian perspective
    Samantra, Chitrasen
    Datta, Saurav
    Mahapatra, Siba Shankar
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2014, 41 (08) : 4010 - 4022
  • [28] The evidential reasoning approach for multiple attribute decision analysis using intuitionistic fuzzy information
    Qian, Gang
    Qian, Xiaohua
    [J]. 2008 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, NETWORKING AND MOBILE COMPUTING, VOLS 1-31, 2008, : 11951 - 11955
  • [29] Supporting decision-making in patient risk assessment using a hierarchical fuzzy model
    Alessandro Jatobá
    Hugo Cesar Bellas
    Isabella Koster
    Catherine M. Burns
    Mario Cesar R. Vidal
    Cláudio Henrique S. Grecco
    Paulo Victor R. de Carvalho
    [J]. Cognition, Technology & Work, 2018, 20 : 477 - 488
  • [30] Supporting decision-making in patient risk assessment using a hierarchical fuzzy model
    Jatoba, Alessandro
    Bellas, Hugo Cesar
    Koster, Isabella
    Burns, Catherine M.
    Vidal, Mario Cesar R.
    Grecco, Claudio Henrique S.
    de Carvalho, Paulo Victor R.
    [J]. COGNITION TECHNOLOGY & WORK, 2018, 20 (03) : 477 - 488