Clinical significance of categorisation of mammographic density for breast cancer prognosis

被引:0
|
作者
Morishita, M
Ohtsuru, A
Hayashi, T
Isomoto, I
Itoyanagi, N
Maeda, S
Honda, S
Yano, H
Uga, T
Nagayasu, T
Kanematsu, T
Yamashita, S
机构
[1] Nagasaki Univ, Grad Sch Biomed Sci, Atom Bomb Dis Inst, Dept Mol Med, Nagasaki 8528523, Japan
[2] Nagasaki Univ, Grad Sch Biomed Sci, Int Hibakusha Med Ctr, Nagasaki 8528523, Japan
[3] Nagasaki Univ, Grad Sch Biomed Sci, Dept Pathol, Nagasaki 8528523, Japan
[4] Nagasaki Univ, Grad Sch Biomed Sci, Dept Radiol, Nagasaki 8528523, Japan
[5] Nagasaki Univ, Grad Sch Biomed Sci, Dept Translat Med Sci, Div Surg Oncol, Nagasaki 8528523, Japan
[6] Nagasaki Univ, Grad Sch Biomed Sci, Dept Transplantat & Digest Surg, Nagasaki 8528523, Japan
[7] Nagasaki Univ, Grad Sch Biomed Sci, Dept Radiat Epidemiol, Nagasaki 8528523, Japan
关键词
breast cancer; mammography density; prognosis; steroid receptor;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Mammographic density reflects comprehensive changes in the mammary gland. The condition of the tumour microenvironment is a possible factor affecting tumour progression, as well as a tumour risk factor. This study aimed to determine whether marni-nographic density correlates with tumour clinicopathological features and prognosis in breast cancer patients. The analysis involved 163 Japanese women who underwent surgery for breast cancer between 1999 and 2003 in the Nagasaki University Hospital, Japan. Mammo-graphic density was classified according to the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) categories 1-4. Age, tumour size, axillary lymph node involvement, steroid receptor (SR) status, histological grade and Nottingham prognostic index (NPI) were analysed by density category and tested for statistically significant differences across categories. A significant difference (P < 0.05) by breast-density category was found only for age. SR-negative tumours had significantly worse NPI scores than SR-positive tumours in breast-density categories 2 (P=0.03) and 4 (P < 0.001). A high distant-metastasis frequency was observed in category 4 SR negatives (44%) versus category 4 SR positives (4.3%). These findings reveal that although the BI-RADS breast-density category alone is not associated with prognosis in breast cancer, patients who are both category 4 and SR negative have an extremely poor prognosis.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1307 / 1312
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mammographic density as a risk factor for breast cancer
    Fulton, Loralee
    Reynolds, Diane
    Flom, Julie
    Terry, MaryBeth
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2008, 35 (03) : 516 - 517
  • [22] Tamoxifen in women with breast cancer and mammographic density
    Meggiorini, M. L.
    Labi, L.
    Vestri, A. R.
    Porfiri, L. M.
    Savelli, S.
    De Felice, C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 29 (06) : 598 - 601
  • [23] Breast cancer susceptibility loci and mammographic density
    Rulla M Tamimi
    David Cox
    Peter Kraft
    Graham A Colditz
    Susan E Hankinson
    David J Hunter
    Breast Cancer Research, 10
  • [24] Mammographic Density for Personalized Breast Cancer Risk
    Kataoka, Masako
    RADIOLOGY, 2023, 306 (02)
  • [25] Mammographic Density Change and Risk of Breast Cancer
    Azam, Shadi
    Eriksson, Mikael
    Sjolander, Arvid
    Hellgren, Roxanna
    Gabrielson, Marike
    Czene, Kamila
    Hall, Per
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2020, 112 (04): : 391 - 399
  • [26] Breast cancer risk and measured mammographic density
    Yaffe, MJ
    Boyd, NF
    Byng, JW
    Jong, RA
    Fishell, E
    Lockwood, GA
    Little, LE
    Tritchler, DL
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 1998, 7 : S47 - S55
  • [27] Relationship of mammographic density with breast cancer subtypes
    Gierach, Gretchen L.
    Lissowska, Jolanta
    Garcia-Closas, Montserrat
    Yang, Xiaohong R.
    Figueroa, Jonine D.
    Anzick, Sarah
    Wesolowska, Ewa
    Brinton, Louise A.
    Meltzer, Paul S.
    Boyd, Norman F.
    Sherman, Mark E.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2010, 70
  • [28] Mammographic density change and risk of breast cancer
    Azam, S.
    Eriksson, M.
    Sjolander, A.
    Hellgren, R.
    Gabrielson, M.
    Czene, K.
    Hall, P.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2019, 30 : 4 - 5
  • [29] Is mammographic density a marker of breast cancer phenotypes?
    Kanbayti, Ibrahem H.
    Rae, William I. D.
    McEntee, Mark F.
    Al-Foheidi, Meteb
    Ashour, Sawsan
    Turson, Smeera A.
    Ekpo, Ernest U.
    CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2020, 31 (08) : 749 - 765
  • [30] Mammographic density and molecular subtypes of breast cancer
    Eriksson, L.
    Hall, P.
    Czene, K.
    Silva, I. dos Santos
    McCormack, V.
    Bergh, J.
    Bjohle, J.
    Ploner, A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 107 (01) : 18 - 23