Independent Monte-Carlo dose calculation for MLC based CyberKnife radiotherapy

被引:8
|
作者
Mackeprang, P-H [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Vuong, D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Volken, W. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Henzen, D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Schmidhalter, D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Malthaner, M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Mueller, S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Frei, D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Stampanoni, M. F. M. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Dal Pra, A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Aebersold, D. M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Fix, M. K. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Manser, P. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Bern Univ Hosp, Inselspital, Div Med Radiat Phys, Bern, Switzerland
[2] Bern Univ Hosp, Inselspital, Dept Radiat Oncol, Bern, Switzerland
[3] Univ Bern, Bern, Switzerland
[4] Univ Zurich, Inst Biomed Engn, Zurich, Switzerland
[5] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Zurich, Switzerland
[6] Paul Scherrer Inst, Swiss Light Source, Villigen, Switzerland
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2018年 / 63卷 / 01期
关键词
Monte Carlo; QA; CyberKnife; STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY SYSTEM; DELIVERY QUALITY-ASSURANCE; MV PHOTON BEAMS; CLINICAL IMPLEMENTATION; FILM; SIMULATIONS; TOMOTHERAPY; TISSUE; VMAT;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6560/aa97f8
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
This work aims to develop, implement and validate a Monte Carlo (MC)-based independent dose calculation (IDC) framework to perform patient-specific quality assurance (QA) for multi-leaf collimator (MLC)-based CyberKnife (R) (Accuray Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) treatment plans. The IDC framework uses an XML-format treatment plan as exported from the treatment planning system (TPS) and DICOM format patient CT data, an MC beam model using phase spaces, CyberKnife MLC beam modifier transport using the EGS++ class library, a beam sampling and coordinate transformation engine and dose scoring using DOSXYZnrc. The framework is validated against dose profiles and depth dose curves of single beams with varying field sizes in a water tank in units of cGy/Monitor Unit and against a 2D dose distribution of a full prostate treatment plan measured with Gafchromic EBT3 (Ashland Advanced Materials, Bridgewater, NJ) film in a homogeneous water-equivalent slab phantom. The film measurement is compared to IDC results by gamma analysis using 2% (global)/2 mm criteria. Further, the dose distribution of the clinical treatment plan in the patient CT is compared to TPS calculation by gamma analysis using the same criteria. Dose profiles from IDC calculation in a homogeneous water phantom agree within 2.3% of the global max dose or 1 mm distance to agreement to measurements for all except the smallest field size. Comparing the film measurement to calculated dose, 99.9% of all voxels pass gamma analysis, comparing dose calculated by the IDC framework to TPS calculated dose for the clinical prostate plan shows 99.0% passing rate. IDC calculated dose is found to be up to 5.6% lower than dose calculated by the TPS in this case near metal fiducial markers. An MC-based modular IDC framework was successfully developed, implemented and validated against measurements and is now available to perform patient-specific QA by IDC.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] An independent dose calculation algorithm for MLC-based radiotherapy including the spatial dependence of MLC transmission
    Lorenz, Friedlieb
    Nalichowski, Adrian
    Rosca, Florin
    Killoran, Joseph
    Wenz, Frederik
    Zygmanski, Piotr
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2008, 53 (03): : 557 - 573
  • [12] MONTE-CARLO CALCULATION OF ELECTRON DEPTH DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS
    SCHRIBER, SO
    FUNK, LW
    MOWCHENKO, JT
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1977, 22 (03): : 573 - 573
  • [13] Monte Carlo dose calculation in modern day radiotherapy
    Kueng, R.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 170 : S2 - S2
  • [14] Feasibility of an Independent Dose Calculation for VMAT with Monte Carlo
    Quino, L. Vazquez
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06)
  • [15] Commissioning of the Monte-Carlo based treatment planning system for photon-MLC modulated electron radiotherapy
    Mamalui-Hunter, M.
    Klein, E.
    Li, J.
    Low, D.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (06) : 2427 - 2427
  • [16] Experimental verification of a Monte Carlo-based MLC simulation model for IMRT dose calculation
    Tyagi, Neelam
    Moran, Jean M.
    Litzenberg, Dale W.
    Bielajew, Alex F.
    Fraass, Benedick A.
    Chetty, Indrin J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (02) : 651 - 663
  • [17] Is Monte Carlo Dose Calculation Method Necessary for Cyberknife Brain Treatment Planning?
    Wang, L.
    Fourkal, E.
    Hayes, S.
    Jin, L.
    Ma, C.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 275 - 275
  • [18] Ray-trace Calculation Significantly Overestimates Dose Compared To Monte Carlo Calculation In CyberKnife Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy Of Lung Tumors
    Liu, M. B.
    Eclov, N.
    Trakul, N.
    Diehn, M.
    Maxim, P. G.
    Dieterich, S.
    Loo, B. W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (02): : S853 - S853
  • [19] GPU-based fast Monte Carlo simulation for radiotherapy dose calculation
    Jia, Xun
    Gu, Xuejun
    Graves, Yan Jiang
    Folkerts, Michael
    Jiang, Steve B.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2011, 56 (22): : 7017 - 7031
  • [20] Fast CPU-based Monte Carlo simulation for radiotherapy dose calculation
    Ziegenhein, Peter
    Pirner, Sven
    Kamerling, Cornelis Ph
    Oelfke, Uwe
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 60 (15): : 6097 - 6111