The Power of Comparative Reasoning

被引:0
|
作者
Yagnik, Jay [1 ]
Strelow, Dennis [1 ]
Ross, David A. [1 ]
Lin, Ruei-sung [1 ]
机构
[1] Google Inc, Mountain View, CA 94043 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Rank correlation measures are known for their resilience to perturbations in numeric values and are widely used in many evaluation metrics. Such ordinal measures have rarely been applied in treatment of numeric features as a representational transformation. We emphasize the benefits of ordinal representations of input features both theoretically and empirically. We present a family of algorithms for computing ordinal embeddings based on partial order statistics. Apart from having the stability benefits of ordinal measures, these embeddings are highly nonlinear, giving rise to sparse feature spaces highly favored by several machine learning methods. These embeddings are deterministic, data independent and by virtue of being based on partial order statistics, add another degree of resilience to noise. These machine-learning-free methods when applied to the task of fast similarity search outperform state-of-the-art machine learning methods with complex optimization setups. For solving classification problems, the embeddings provide a nonlinear transformation resulting in sparse binary codes that are well-suited for a large class of machine learning algorithms. These methods show significant improvement on VOC 2010 using simple linear classifiers which can be trained quickly. Our method can be extended to the case of polynomial kernels, while permitting very efficient computation. Further, since the popular MinHash algorithm is a special case of our method, we demonstrate an efficient scheme for computing MinHash on conjunctions of binary features. The actual method can be implemented in about 10 lines of code in most languages (2 lines in MATLAB), and does not require any data-driven optimization.
引用
收藏
页码:2431 / 2438
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A comparative study of uncertainty methods for legal reasoning
    Woerner, D
    Armaly, S
    Butler, A
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 1999, 14 (12) : 1269 - 1292
  • [32] COMPARATIVE REASONING ABILITIES OF COLLEGE-STUDENTS
    MALONEY, DP
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 1981, 49 (08) : 784 - 786
  • [33] Modeling and Reasoning with Qualitative Comparative Clinical Knowledge
    Ma, Jianbing
    Liu, Weiru
    Hunter, Anthony
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2011, 26 (01) : 25 - 46
  • [34] Case based reasoning systems for comparative assessment
    Stumptner, R.
    Freudenthaler, B.
    Kueng, J.
    Aburahma, M.
    BRIDGE MAINTENANCE, SAFETY, MANAGEMENT AND LIFE-CYCLE OPTIMIZATION, 2010, : 1680 - 1686
  • [35] Reasoning about Dependence, Preference and Coalitional Power
    Chen, Qian
    Shi, Chenwei
    Wang, Yiyan
    JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL LOGIC, 2024, 53 (01) : 99 - 130
  • [36] Reasoning about Dependence, Preference and Coalitional Power
    Qian Chen
    Chenwei Shi
    Yiyan Wang
    Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2024, 53 : 99 - 130
  • [37] True to the power of one? Cognition, argument, and reasoning
    Khlentzos, Drew Michael
    Stevenson, Bruce
    BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2011, 34 (02) : 82 - +
  • [38] On the role of explanatory and systematic power in scientific reasoning
    Peter Brössel
    Synthese, 2015, 192 : 3877 - 3913
  • [39] Diagnostic reasoning model for power system failures
    North China Electric Power Univ, Beijing, China
    Zhongguo Dianji Gongcheng Xuebao, 6 (399-402):
  • [40] THE 3 TRUTHS OR LEIBNIZ ON THE POWER AND LIMITATIONS OF REASONING
    FREMONT, C
    REVUE DES SCIENCES PHILOSOPHIQUES ET THEOLOGIQUES, 1992, 76 (01): : 43 - 55