The effect of distance traveled on disease outcomes in gestational trophoblastic neoplasia

被引:11
|
作者
Clark, Leslie H. [1 ,2 ]
Staley, S. Allison [1 ]
Barber, Emma L. [1 ,2 ]
Wysham, Weiya Z. [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Kenneth H. [1 ,2 ]
Soper, John T. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Div Gynecol Oncol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
gestational trophoblastic neoplasia; recurrence; survival; travel distance; CANCER CARE; GEOGRAPHIC ACCESS; OVARIAN-CANCER; BREAST; STAGE; ASSOCIATION; DISPARITIES; POPULATION; DIAGNOSIS; PROVIDER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2016.02.008
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia is a rare gynecological malignancy often treated at tertiary referral centers. Patients frequently travel long distances to obtain care for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia, which may affect cancer outcomes in these patients. OBJECTIVE: We examined the association between distance traveled to obtain care and disease burden at time of presentation as well as recurrence. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of all patients diagnosed with gestational trophoblastic neoplasia from January 1995 to June 2015 at a high-volume tertiary referral center. Patients were included if they met International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2000 criteria for postmolar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia or had choriocarcinoma, placental-site trophoblastic tumor, or epithelioid trophoblastic tumor. Sixty patients were identified. Disease burden at presentation was examined using both the World Health Organization prognostic score and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Patients who traveled more than 50 miles were considered long-distance travelers based on previous literature on the effect of distance traveled on cancer outcomes. Demographic, clinical, and pathological data were obtained by chart review. Bivariable comparisons were performed using the chi(2) test or Fisher exact test for categorical variables. The t test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare continuous variables when normally or not normally distributed. RESULTS: Most patients presented at stage I (61%) with low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (70%). Median distance to care was 40 miles (range, 4-384). Eighteen patients (30%) had no insurance and 42 (70%) had either private or public insurance. Patients traveling more than 50 miles for care were more likely to have high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (46% vs 19%, P =.03), but there was no difference in recurrence (13% vs 11%, P=.89). Patients with high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia lived 63 miles farther (92 vs 28 miles, P <.001) than patients with low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. Long-distance travelers had a longer period between antecedent pregnancy and gestational trophoblastic neoplasia diagnosis (10 weeks vs 4.5 weeks, P=.009) and were more likely to receive multiagent chemotherapy (86% vs 61%, P=.03). CONCLUSION: In this cohort, long distance traveled to obtain care for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia was associated with an increased risk of presenting with high-risk disease and requiring multiagent chemotherapy for treatment. Patients with high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia traveled nearly 100 miles to obtain care. There may be a delay in diagnosis in women traveling more than 50 miles to obtain care; however, we found no difference in recurrence risk for long-distance travelers.
引用
收藏
页码:217.e1 / 217.e5
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Vaginal metastases in gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
    Berry, Emily
    Hagopian, George S.
    Lurain, John R.
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2008, 53 (07) : 487 - 492
  • [32] Hydatidiform moles and gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
    Golfier, F.
    Guastalla, J. -P.
    Trillet-Lenoir, V.
    Massardier, J.
    Pavic, M.
    Schott, A. M.
    Raudrant, D.
    ONCOLOGIE, 2008, 10 (10) : 604 - 611
  • [33] Pelvic Imaging in Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia
    Lim, Adrian K. P.
    Patel, Daksha
    Patel, Nayna
    Hawtin, Katherine
    Dayal, Linda
    Schmid, Peter
    Savage, Philip
    Seckl, Michael. J.
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2008, 53 (08) : 575 - 578
  • [34] Current Management of Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia
    Goldstein, Donald Peter
    Berkowitz, Ross S.
    HEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2012, 26 (01) : 111 - +
  • [35] Diagnosis and management of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
    Ng, TY
    Wong, LC
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH IN CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2003, 17 (06): : 893 - 903
  • [36] Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia in American Indians
    Smith, HO
    Qualls, CR
    Hilgers, RD
    Verschraegen, CF
    Rayburn, WF
    Cole, LW
    Padilla, LA
    Key, CR
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2004, 49 (07) : 535 - 544
  • [37] IMMUNOLOGICAL PARAMETERS IN GESTATIONAL TROPHOBLASTIC NEOPLASIA
    HO, PC
    MAK, LW
    LAWTON, JWM
    MA, HK
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE IMMUNOLOGY, 1980, 1 (5-6) : 307 - 319
  • [38] SEX ASSIGNMENT IN GESTATIONAL TROPHOBLASTIC NEOPLASIA
    DAVIS, JR
    SURWIT, EA
    GARAY, JP
    FORTIER, KJ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1984, 148 (06) : 722 - 725
  • [39] Treatment of metastatic gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
    El-Helw, Looie M.
    Hancock, Barry W.
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2007, 8 (08): : 715 - 724
  • [40] Surgical Management of Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia
    Elias, Kevin M.
    Berkowitz, Ross S.
    Horowitz, Neil S.
    HEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2024, 38 (06) : 1287 - 1295