Speciation of heavy metals in sediment by conventional, ultrasound and microwave assisted single extraction methods: A comparison with modified sequential extraction procedure

被引:156
|
作者
Arain, Muhammad B. [1 ]
Kazi, Tasneem G. [1 ]
Jamah, Muhammad K. [1 ]
Jalbani, Nusrat [1 ]
Afridi, Hassan I. [1 ]
Baig, Jameel A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sindh, Ctr Excellence Analyt Chem, Jamshoro 76080, Pakistan
关键词
lake sediment; metal; sequential extraction; single extraction; microwave; ultrasonic;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.11.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sequential extraction procedure proposed by the European Standards, Measurements and Testing (SM&T) Program, formerly the Community Bureau of Reference (BCR), has been applied for the heavy metals (HMs) partitioning in fresh water lake sediment samples. The results obtained by conventional sequential extraction BCR method (SEB) for Cd, Cu, Cr, Ni, Pb and Zn were compared with those estimated from three alternative single extractions, conventional (CSE), ultrasonic (USE) and microwave assisted (MSE), using identical operating conditions applied in each individual BCR fraction and validated by the CRM BCR 701. Extractable HMs contents obtained by all compared methodologies were measured by atomic absorption spectrometery. With the use of compromised sonication and microwave conditions, steps 1-3 of the sequential extraction (excluding the hydrogen peroxide digestion in step 3) could be completed between 15-30 min using ultrasonic bath, while 60-120 s were required for MSE. The total extractable metal contents obtained by three single extractions ranged from 75.1% to 114.0% except Cr in first step, which was extracted (125.3%) by MSE method as compared to those obtained by SEB procedure. The precision of the proposed BCR single extraction methods (expressed as RSD%) was found in the range of (3.99-9.6%) for all metals. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:998 / 1006
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] COMPARISON OF MICROWAVE AND CONVENTIONAL EXTRACTION TECHNIQUES FOR THE DETERMINATION OF METALS IN SOIL, SEDIMENT AND SLUDGE SAMPLES BY ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY
    NIEUWENHUIZE, J
    POLEYVOS, CH
    VANDENAKKER, AH
    VANDELFT, W
    ANALYST, 1991, 116 (04) : 347 - 351
  • [32] The effect of oxidation and acidification on the speciation of heavy metals in sulfide-rich freshwater sediments using a sequential extraction procedure
    Buykx, SEJ
    Bleijenberg, M
    van den Hoop, MAGT
    Loch, JPG
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING, 2000, 2 (01): : 23 - 27
  • [33] Optimization of microwave-assisted solvent extraction for volatile organic acids in tobacco and its comparison with conventional extraction methods
    Zhu, Xiaolan
    Su, Qingde
    Cai, Jibao
    Yang, Jun
    ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2006, 579 (01) : 88 - 94
  • [34] Comparison of modified ultrasound-assisted and traditional extraction methods for the extraction of baicalin and baicalein from Radix Scutellariae
    Yang, Yu-Chiao
    Wei, Ming-Chi
    Huang, Ting-Chia
    Lee, Suen-Zone
    Lin, Shiow-Shyung
    INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2013, 45 : 182 - 190
  • [35] Extraction of silymarin from milk thistle (Silybum marianum) seeds - a comparison of conventional and microwave-assisted extraction methods
    Saleh, Ibrahim Ahmed
    Vinatoru, Mircea
    Mason, Timothy James
    Abdel-Azim, Nahla S.
    Shams, Khaled A.
    Aboutabl, Elsayed
    Hammouda, Faiza M.
    JOURNAL OF MICROWAVE POWER AND ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY, 2017, 51 (02) : 124 - 133
  • [36] Microwave assisted procedure for metal extraction in heavy hydrocarbon feedstocks and emulsions
    Berezinski, John
    Lopez-Linares, Francisco A.
    Nassar, Nashaat N.
    Ortega, Lante Carbognani
    Pereira-Almao, Pedro R.
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2012, 244
  • [37] Comparison of microwave-assisted extraction of aloe-emodin in aloe with Soxhlet extraction and ultrasound-assisted extraction
    WANG GuiHuaSU PingZHANG FanHOU XiangYanYANG Yi GUO ZhenKu College of ScienceBeijing University of Chemical TechnologyBeijing China Chinese Academy of Inspection and QuarantineBeijing China Beijing Rayleigh Analytical Instrument CoBeijing China
    Science China(Chemistry), 2011, 54 (01) : 230 - 235
  • [38] Comparison of microwave-assisted extraction of aloe-emodin in aloe with Soxhlet extraction and ultrasound-assisted extraction
    GuiHua Wang
    Ping Su
    Fan Zhang
    XiangYan Hou
    Yi Yang
    ZhenKu Guo
    Science China Chemistry, 2011, 54 : 231 - 236
  • [40] Comparison of microwave-assisted extraction of aloe-emodin in aloe with Soxhlet extraction and ultrasound-assisted extraction
    Wang GuiHua
    Su Ping
    Zhang Fan
    Hou XiangYan
    Yang Yi
    Guo ZhenKu
    SCIENCE CHINA-CHEMISTRY, 2011, 54 (01) : 231 - 236