Riparian management: A restoration tool for New Zealand streams

被引:36
|
作者
McKergow, Lucy A. [1 ]
Matheson, Fleur E. [1 ]
Quinn, John M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Water & Atmospher Res, POB 11-115, Hamilton, New Zealand
[2] Natl Inst Water & Atmospher Res, Freshwater & Estuaries, POB 11-115, Hamilton, New Zealand
关键词
habitat; restoration; riparian; riparian buffer; tools; water quality; LAND-USE INFLUENCES; WATER-QUALITY; AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPE; NUTRIENT REMOVAL; BUFFER ZONES; PASTURE; WOOD; PINE; CATCHMENT; NITROGEN;
D O I
10.1111/emr.12232
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Many New Zealanders are planning and implementing riparian management, and riparian fencing and planting are now standard best practice tools for water quality and habitat restoration. New Zealand has a long history of action, with the first catchment riparian schemes and science dating back to the 1970s. As a result of this, there is now solid scientific evidence that demonstrates the value of a range of management actions including the following: riparian zones and buffers for livestock exclusion (fencing with or without planting), nutrient processing, shading small streams for temperature control, providing leaf and wood input to stream ecosystems, and enhancing fish and invertebrate habitat. In the last decade or so, on-ground action has accelerated significantly with the introduction of dairy industry and government agreed targets. In 2015, 96% of dairy cows had been excluded from waterways >1m wide and >30cm deep on land that cows graze during the milking season providing impetus for on-ground action to spread into other pastoral industries. Tools for planning, managing and implementing successful riparian restoration have proliferated, informed by on-ground successes and failures. Despite this, there remain challenges for individuals or communities planning riparian restoration. Careful case-by-case assessment is recommended to ensure that plans match design to local landscape constraints and can realistically contribute to improved water quality or habitat outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:218 / 227
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Riparian restoration
    LaFayette, RA
    Bernard, J
    Brady, D
    RIPARIAN MANAGEMENT IN FORESTS OF THE CONTINENTAL EASTERN UNITED STATES, 2000, : 303 - 314
  • [32] Riparian restoration
    Allen, EB
    Niering, WA
    RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 1997, 5 (04) : 1 - 1
  • [33] Implications of riparian management strategies on wood in streams of the Pacific Northwest
    Meleason, MA
    Gregory, SV
    Bolte, JP
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2003, 13 (05) : 1212 - 1221
  • [34] Stubble height as a tool for management of riparian areas
    Clary, WP
    Leininger, WC
    JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT, 2000, 53 (06): : 562 - 573
  • [35] Functional responses of aquatic and riparian vegetation to hydrogeomorphic restoration of channelized lowland streams and their valleys
    Fraaije, Rob G. A.
    Poupin, Claire
    Verhoeven, Jos T. A.
    Soons, Merel B.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2019, 56 (04) : 1007 - 1018
  • [36] Modelling the time course of shade, temperature, and wood recovery in streams with riparian forest restoration
    Davies-Colley, Robert J.
    Meleason, Mark A.
    Hall, Graeme M. J.
    Rutherford, J. Christopher
    NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF MARINE AND FRESHWATER RESEARCH, 2009, 43 (03) : 673 - 688
  • [37] The expansion of woody riparian vegetation, and subsequent stream restoration, influences the metabolism of prairie streams
    Riley, Alyssa J.
    Dodds, Walter K.
    FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 2012, 57 (06) : 1138 - 1150
  • [38] NEW-ZEALAND RESTORATION ECOLOGY
    TOWNS, D
    ATKINSON, I
    NEW SCIENTIST, 1991, 130 (1765) : 36 - 39
  • [39] The Restoration of Compulsory Arbitration in New Zealand
    Riches, J.
    INTERNATIONAL LABOUR REVIEW, 1936, 34 (06) : 733 - 771
  • [40] The development of fungal endophytes as a pest management tool for New Zealand grasslands
    Popay, AJ
    Ball, OJP
    PEST MANAGEMENT - FUTURE CHALLENGES, VOLS 1 AND 2, PROCEEDINGS, 1998, : 373 - 381