Predictors of Poor Adherence of US Gastroenterologists with Colonoscopy Screening and Surveillance Guidelines

被引:25
|
作者
Iskandar, Heba [1 ]
Yan, Yan [2 ]
Elwing, Jill [3 ]
Early, Dayna [4 ]
Colditz, Graham A. [2 ]
Wang, Jean S. [4 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Div Digest Dis, Dept Med, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Div Publ Hlth Sci, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[3] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Div Gastroenterol, St Louis, MO 63106 USA
[4] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Div Gastroenterol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
Colorectal cancer screening; Colorectal cancer surveillance; Colonoscopy; Guideline adherence; Colonic neoplasms/diagnosis; Colonic neoplasms/prevention and control; SOCIETY-TASK-FORCE; AMERICAN-CANCER-SOCIETY; POST-POLYPECTOMY SURVEILLANCE; ON-COLORECTAL-CANCER; CONSENSUS UPDATE; COMMUNITY PRACTICE; NATIONWIDE SURVEY; RECOMMENDATIONS; POPULATION; PHYSICIANS;
D O I
10.1007/s10620-014-3403-0
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer published guidelines for colonoscopy screening and surveillance in 2008 and affirmed them in 2012. Characteristics associated with guideline adherence among US gastroenterologists have not been assessed. Aim Assess awareness and adherence of US gastroenterologists with national guidelines for colonoscopy screening and surveillance and predictors of adherence to guidelines. Methods A Web-based survey was administered to gastroenterologists in various practice settings across the USA. Results A total of 306 gastroenterologists completed the survey; 86 % reported awareness of the guidelines. Lowvolume colonoscopists (<20/month) were less likely to be aware of the guidelines (OR 0.26, p = 0.03) compared to high-volume colonoscopists (>100/month). Those completing training before 1990 were less likely to report following guidelines (OR 0.37, p = 0.01). Adherence with guidelines was then assessed via clinical scenarios. Compared to physicians finishing training in 1991-2010, less adherence was seen in those finishing before 1990 (OR 0.75, p < 0.001) or currently in training (OR 0.72, p = 0.004). Compared to the Western USA, less adherence was seen in the Midwest (OR 0.69, p = 0.001), Northeast (OR 0.63, p < 0.001), and South (OR 0.59, p < 0.001). Lower adherence was seen among non-academic physicians (OR 0.72, p = 0.001) and low-volume colonoscopists (OR 0.52, p < 0.001). Conclusions There is poor adherence with colonoscopy screening and surveillance guidelines among US gastroenterologists. Poor adherence was associated with being in training or finishing training before 1990, practicing in the South, non-academic settings, and low colonoscopy volume. These findings can target interventions for quality improvement in colorectal cancer screening and surveillance.
引用
收藏
页码:971 / 978
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] IDENTIFYING BARRIERS TO ADHERENCE TO SURVEILLANCE COLONOSCOPY
    Cinnor, Birtukan
    Perdue, David G.
    Kim, Adam
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 158 (06) : S916 - S916
  • [32] Non-Adherence to Colorectal Polyp Surveillance Guidelines: Magnitude and Factors Associated With Non-Adherence in an Open Access Colonoscopy Screening Program at an Academic Institution
    Liu, Margaret C.
    Kassim, Gassan
    Mead-Harvey, Carolyn
    Anderson, Lisa R.
    Ramirez, Francisco
    Gurudu, Suryakanth
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 118 (10): : S156 - S157
  • [33] Adherence to colorectal polyp surveillance guidelines: is there a 'scope' to increase the opportunities for screening?
    O'Connor, Anthony
    Keane, Ruth-Anne
    Egan, Brian
    Lee, Nikki
    O'Connor, Humphrey
    Qasim, Asghar
    Ryan, Barbara
    Breslin, Niall
    McNamara, Deirdre
    O'Morain, Colm
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2011, 20 (01) : 40 - 45
  • [34] Guidelines for Colonoscopy Surveillance After Screening and Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer
    Lieberman, David A.
    Rex, Douglas K.
    Winawer, Sidney J.
    Giardiello, Francis M.
    Johnson, David A.
    Levin, Theodore R.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 143 (03) : 844 - 857
  • [35] IMPROVING ADHERENCE TO GASTRIC INTESTINAL METAPLASIA CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES AMONG GASTROENTEROLOGISTS AT A US ACADEMIC INSTITUTION
    Millien, Valentine O.
    Jacob, Jake S.
    Ketwaroo, Gyanprakash A.
    Flores, Avegail G.
    Hernaez, Ruben
    Hou, Jason K.
    Husain, Nisreen S.
    Jarbrink-Sehgal, M. Ellionore
    Khalaf, Natalia
    Natarajan, Yamini
    Velez, Maria E.
    Rosen, Daniel
    El-Serag, Hashem B.
    Tan, Mimi C.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 160 (06) : S85 - S85
  • [36] Improving Adherence to Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia Clinical Practice Guidelines Among Gastroenterologists at a US Academic Institution
    Millien, Valentine O.
    Jacob, Jake S.
    Ketwaroo, Gyanprakash A.
    Flores, Avegail G.
    Hernaez, Ruben
    Hou, Jason K.
    Husain, Nisreen
    Jarbrink-Sehgal, Maria E.
    Khalaf, Natalia I.
    Natarajan, Yamini
    Velez, Maria E.
    Rosen, Daniel G.
    El-Serag, Hashem B.
    Tan, Mimi C.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 161 (01) : E29 - E30
  • [37] Guidelines for Colonoscopy Surveillance: A Clinical Conundrum
    Fritz, Howard P.
    Yarze, Joseph C.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 144 (04) : E21 - E21
  • [38] Colonoscopy surveillance: guidelines for polyps and IBD
    Senore, Carlo
    Lorenzetti, Roberto
    Bellisario, Cristina
    Hassan, Cesare
    MINERVA GASTROENTEROLOGICA E DIETOLOGICA, 2016, 62 (02) : 207 - 222
  • [39] Korean Guidelines for Postpolypectomy Colonoscopy Surveillance
    Yang, Dong-Hoon
    Hong, Sung Noh
    Kim, Young-Ho
    Hong, Sung Pil
    Shin, Sung Jae
    Kim, Seong-Eun
    Lee, Bo In
    Lee, Suck-Ho
    Park, Dong Il
    Kim, Hyun-Soo
    Yang, Suk-Kyun
    Kim, Hyo Jong
    Kim, Se Hyung
    Kim, Hyun Jung
    CLINICAL ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 45 (01) : 44 - 61
  • [40] Guidelines for an Optimum Screening Colonoscopy
    Vemulapalli, Krishna C.
    Rex, Douglas K.
    CURRENT COLORECTAL CANCER REPORTS, 2012, 8 (01) : 6 - 15