Predictors of Poor Adherence of US Gastroenterologists with Colonoscopy Screening and Surveillance Guidelines

被引:25
|
作者
Iskandar, Heba [1 ]
Yan, Yan [2 ]
Elwing, Jill [3 ]
Early, Dayna [4 ]
Colditz, Graham A. [2 ]
Wang, Jean S. [4 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Div Digest Dis, Dept Med, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Div Publ Hlth Sci, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[3] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Div Gastroenterol, St Louis, MO 63106 USA
[4] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Div Gastroenterol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
Colorectal cancer screening; Colorectal cancer surveillance; Colonoscopy; Guideline adherence; Colonic neoplasms/diagnosis; Colonic neoplasms/prevention and control; SOCIETY-TASK-FORCE; AMERICAN-CANCER-SOCIETY; POST-POLYPECTOMY SURVEILLANCE; ON-COLORECTAL-CANCER; CONSENSUS UPDATE; COMMUNITY PRACTICE; NATIONWIDE SURVEY; RECOMMENDATIONS; POPULATION; PHYSICIANS;
D O I
10.1007/s10620-014-3403-0
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer published guidelines for colonoscopy screening and surveillance in 2008 and affirmed them in 2012. Characteristics associated with guideline adherence among US gastroenterologists have not been assessed. Aim Assess awareness and adherence of US gastroenterologists with national guidelines for colonoscopy screening and surveillance and predictors of adherence to guidelines. Methods A Web-based survey was administered to gastroenterologists in various practice settings across the USA. Results A total of 306 gastroenterologists completed the survey; 86 % reported awareness of the guidelines. Lowvolume colonoscopists (<20/month) were less likely to be aware of the guidelines (OR 0.26, p = 0.03) compared to high-volume colonoscopists (>100/month). Those completing training before 1990 were less likely to report following guidelines (OR 0.37, p = 0.01). Adherence with guidelines was then assessed via clinical scenarios. Compared to physicians finishing training in 1991-2010, less adherence was seen in those finishing before 1990 (OR 0.75, p < 0.001) or currently in training (OR 0.72, p = 0.004). Compared to the Western USA, less adherence was seen in the Midwest (OR 0.69, p = 0.001), Northeast (OR 0.63, p < 0.001), and South (OR 0.59, p < 0.001). Lower adherence was seen among non-academic physicians (OR 0.72, p = 0.001) and low-volume colonoscopists (OR 0.52, p < 0.001). Conclusions There is poor adherence with colonoscopy screening and surveillance guidelines among US gastroenterologists. Poor adherence was associated with being in training or finishing training before 1990, practicing in the South, non-academic settings, and low colonoscopy volume. These findings can target interventions for quality improvement in colorectal cancer screening and surveillance.
引用
收藏
页码:971 / 978
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Predictors of Poor Adherence of US Gastroenterologists with Colonoscopy Screening and Surveillance Guidelines
    Heba Iskandar
    Yan Yan
    Jill Elwing
    Dayna Early
    Graham A. Colditz
    Jean S. Wang
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2015, 60 : 971 - 978
  • [2] Compliance of US Gastroenterologists With Colonoscopy Screening and Surveillance Guidelines
    Iskandar, Heba
    Yan, Yan
    Elwing, Jill E.
    Early, Dayna S.
    Wang, Jean S.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 142 (05) : S233 - S233
  • [3] Colonoscopy screening and surveillance guidelines
    Saito, Yutaka
    Oka, Shiro
    Kawamura, Takuji
    Shimoda, Ryo
    Sekiguchi, Masau
    Tamai, Naoto
    Hotta, Kinichi
    Matsuda, Takahisa
    Misawa, Masashi
    Tanaka, Shinji
    Iriguchi, Yosuke
    Nozaki, Ryoichi
    Yamamoto, Hironori
    Yoshida, Masahiro
    Fujimoto, Kazuma
    Inoue, Haruhiro
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 33 (04) : 486 - 519
  • [4] Surveillance colonoscopy for colorectal polyps: Recommendations by US gastroenterologists and surgeons
    Mysliwiec, PA
    Brown, ML
    Klabunde, CN
    Ransohoff, DF
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 124 (04) : A69 - A69
  • [5] Factors Influencing Adherence to Surveillance Colonoscopy Guidelines
    Raile, Benjamin W.
    Sun, Simeng
    Coyne, Thomas
    Naples, Scott
    Huynh, Richard
    Tsynman, Donald N.
    Reynolds, James C.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 140 (05) : S568 - S568
  • [6] Predictors of Nonadherence to Screening and Surveillance Colonoscopy
    Chehl, Navdeep
    Shawron, Krista
    Sims, Shannon
    Li, Hong
    Avery, Elizabeth
    Barnes, Lisa
    Richardson, Dejuran
    Wang, Stephanie
    Losurdo, John
    Mobarhan, Sohrab
    Melson, Joshua
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 108 : S630 - S630
  • [7] Is Adherence to Surveillance Colonoscopy Guidelines in Clinical Practice Improving?
    Bartel, Michael
    Robertson, Douglas
    Pohl, Heiko
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 106 : S582 - S582
  • [8] Predictors of non-adherence to screening colonoscopy
    Denberg, TD
    Melhado, TV
    Coombes, JM
    Berman, K
    Byers, T
    Marcus, AC
    Steiner, YF
    Ahnen, DJ
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 20 : 188 - 188
  • [9] Predictors of Adherence to Post-Polypectomy Surveillance Colonoscopy
    Calderwood, Audrey H.
    Schroy, Paul C., III
    Kluge, Matthew A.
    Cabral, Howard J.
    Burgess, James F., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE FOR THE POOR AND UNDERSERVED, 2016, 27 (01) : 261 - 279
  • [10] PROVIDER ADHERENCE TO AND PREDICTORS OF VARIABILITY FOR THE 2020 US MULTI-SOCIETY TASK FORCE ON COLORECTAL CANCER GUIDELINES FOR SURVEILLANCE AFTER COLONOSCOPY WITH POLYPECTOMY
    Cassell, Benjamin E.
    Boland, Katherine
    Tarter, Wyatt
    Hochheimer, Camille J.
    Long, Colleen
    Austin, Gregory L.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 164 (06) : S538 - S538